UPI Study › Courses › Principles of Management › Free lessons › Lesson 2.1 Free with a free account
Planning, Organizing, Leading, and Controlling: The Management Cycle
Principles of Management · Chapter 2: Core Management Functions and the Leadership LinkSection 2.1 · lesson 4 of 11713 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Principles of Management.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Principles of Management
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Why Leadership Sits at the Heart of Management →← Inside a Manager's Day: Mintzberg's Ten Managerial RolesNext lesson: Why Leadership Sits at the Heart of Management →
In this lesson
Planning, organizing, leading, and controlling, and how they connect.
- Describe the 4 functions and what each produces
- Explain why they form a cycle, not a sequence
- Diagnose a struggling unit by its missing function
- Identify the function at work in an activity
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,921 words). Read along, or search it.
Core Management Functions and the Leadership Link
The Management Cycle
Chapter one asked who managers are, what skills they need, and what they are observed doing. This chapter asks a different question. What is all that activity for? The answer used throughout the rest of this course is a framework of four functions. Planning, organizing, leading, and controlling. We define each one, and what it produces. Then we see why the four form a cycle rather than a straight line, and which step managers most often skip. We also look at what a unit looks like when one function is missing. Each absence leaves a recognizable signature. That makes the framework a diagnostic tool, not just a list to memorize.
Fayol, 1916
A Framework With a Traceable Origin
The four functions are conventionally named planning, organizing, leading, and controlling. They are often abbreviated by their initials, as the P O L C framework. Chapter one described the observed form of managerial work. This framework describes its purpose. Its origin is traceable. It goes back to the French engineer and administrative theorist Henri Fayol. In nineteen sixteen, Fayol proposed that administrative activity could be broken into a set of functions. Those functions, he argued, are common to any organization, regardless of industry. One detail is worth getting right. Fayol's original list contained five elements, not four. Over the following decades, later writers consolidated and relabeled them somewhat differently. The four-function version used in this course is where that consolidation eventually settled. It is not Fayol's original wording. Fayol also made a separate, more detailed contribution, fourteen principles of administration. Those come later, in subchapter three point five.
Planning
Where Are We Going, and How?
Planning is the function of setting objectives, and determining the means by which they will be achieved. In effect, it answers the question: where are we going, and how do we intend to get there? Planning operates at several altitudes, and they fit together as a hierarchy. A mission states why the organization exists, at the most fundamental level. It changes rarely, if ever. A vision states what the organization is working toward becoming. It sits further out, and is more aspirational than any specific target. Goals are broad, longer-term aims that translate the mission and vision into directional commitments. Objectives are specific, measurable targets that put a goal into operation within a defined time frame. Action plans are the concrete steps, assignments, and schedules that will produce a specific objective. Each level narrows and sharpens the one above it. A mission does not tell anyone what to do on Monday morning. An action plan does. The chain connecting the two is what makes planning more than aspiration. Chapter fourteen returns to it in depth.
Organizing
Who Does It, With What, Reporting to Whom?
Organizing is the function of arranging work, allocating resources, and establishing the authority relationships needed to carry out a plan. Where planning decides what should happen, organizing decides who does it, with what resources, and reporting to whom. It starts by grouping related tasks into jobs, and jobs into departments. It assigns authority and responsibility, in the precise sense those terms carried in subchapter one point one. And it sets the reporting relationships, including span of control decisions. Those relationships determine how information and direction move through the unit. Here is why organizing earns its place as a separate function. A plan can specify an ambitious objective, and still never be translated into a structure capable of executing it. That plan remains a document, rather than a result. The full structural content, departmentalization, organizational design, and the trade-offs between structures, comes in chapter seven.
Leading
Directing, Motivating and Communicating
Leading is the function of directing, motivating, and communicating with the people who carry out the plan. They work through the structure that organizing has built. Planning and organizing can, in principle, be worked out on paper. Leading is where a manager's work becomes unavoidably interpersonal. It means getting people to understand what is being asked of them. It means getting them to want to contribute genuine effort, rather than the minimum required. And it means getting them to coordinate with one another, in the moment-to-moment reality of the work. The full body of theory behind this function, leadership styles, motivation, and communication, is developed in chapters nine, ten, and eleven. The next two subchapters explain why leading is often treated as holding a special position among the four. For now, it is simply one function among four in the cycle.
Controlling
Closing the Loop
Controlling is the function that closes the loop. It means establishing standards, measuring actual performance, comparing that performance against the standard, and acting on whatever variance is found. A standard is the expected level of performance against which actual results will be judged. It has to be set before performance occurs, typically during planning. Otherwise controlling has nothing to measure against. Variance is the gap between actual performance and the standard. It can run in either direction. Performance can fall short of a standard, or exceed it, and both are informative. The crucial feature of controlling is what happens after a variance is found. That information does not simply sit in a report. It feeds back into the next round of planning. It may confirm that a plan is working, and should continue. Or it may reveal that an objective, an action plan, or an assumption behind either, needs to change. That return path, from controlling back into planning, is precisely why the four functions are described as a cycle.
Figure 2.1.1
The Functions as a Closed Loop
Picture the four functions arranged in a loop. The output of planning becomes the input that organizing structures around. The output of organizing becomes the arrangement that leading operates within. And the output of leading is what controlling measures. So far, that is only a line. Plan, organize, lead, control. What turns it into a cycle is one more arrow, running from control back to plan. Control's output feeds the next planning cycle. That return step is what makes the framework a loop, rather than a one-way sequence. It is also the step a manager most easily skips under time pressure. The plan is launched, the team is busy, and nobody goes back to check. The case at the end of this section shows what that costs.
A Cycle, Not Stages
Every Function in the Same Hour
It would be a mistake to read the four functions as four stages, completed one after another. Finishing planning before organizing begins, then finishing organizing before leading begins, and so on. In practice, a working manager performs some version of all four within the same hour. She may adjust a plan in response to something she just observed. That is planning. She immediately reassigns a task in light of that adjustment. That is organizing. She explains the change to the person affected, in a way that keeps them engaged rather than resentful. That is leading. And she notes the outcome against what she expected, to judge whether the adjustment worked. That is controlling. So the cycle is best understood as an analytical device. It is a way of sorting and naming what a manager is doing at a given moment, so it can be studied and improved. It is not a literal description of the order in which the functions occur during a working day.
Table 2.1.1
Diagnosing a Missing Function
The functions are easiest to understand through one question. What does a unit look like when one of them is missing? Each absence produces a recognizably different kind of failure. A unit with weak planning is busy, and often exhausting to work in. But its effort is not aimed at anything in particular. People work hard while the unit drifts, because there is no clear objective to organize, lead, or control against. A unit with weak organizing may have a perfectly good plan that still fails. No one clearly owns each piece, resources sit with the wrong people, or reporting lines are too tangled for decisions to move. A unit with weak leading has a plan and a structure that could work. But people comply with the minimum, and withhold the discretionary effort that turns an adequate plan into a strong result. A unit with weak controlling may be executing reasonably well for a while, with no way to know it. By the time a problem becomes visible some other way, it has often grown far larger than it needed to. So when a unit struggles, the useful question is not what went wrong in general. It is which of the four is actually missing.
Complementary Views
What Is It For, and What Does It Look Like?
Subchapter one point three drew a distinction between functions and roles. With both frameworks on the table, it is worth restating precisely. The four functions and the ten roles are not competing descriptions of managerial work. And a manager's day is not divided into blocks of function work and blocks of role work. The functions describe the purpose a piece of managerial activity serves, however that activity is actually carried out. The roles describe the observed form that activity takes. The brief, fragmented, largely verbal exchanges Mintzberg documented. Take a single conversation in which a manager explains a revised deadline to her team. In the functional sense, it is an act of leading. In Mintzberg's sense, it exercises the leader and disseminator roles. The two frameworks answer different questions about the same minute of work. What is this for, and what does it look like?
Levels And Projects
Same Functions, Different Weight
The relative weight of the four functions also shifts across the three levels of management. The pattern parallels the skill-mix shift from subchapter one point two. A frontline manager's work is weighted heavily toward leading and controlling. She directs people through today's work, and checks today's output against today's standard. Little of her planning extends beyond the near term. A top manager's work leans toward planning and, at a broad level, organizing. Setting direction, and shaping the overall structure. Day-to-day leading and controlling of individual employees is delegated through the layers beneath her. The same four functions apply to the project manager, though their content looks somewhat different. Planning is usually more detailed and front-loaded. A project has a defined end, and little chance to adjust course gradually over years. Organizing must work around the authority gap, assembling people who do not report to the project manager. Leading often has to work harder, because team members' formal incentives still point toward their home departments. And controlling is usually tighter and more frequent. A fixed deadline leaves little slack to absorb a variance discovered late.
Case Vignette
Marcus Builds a Plan With No Way to Check It
A composite case shows the cost of a missing function. Marcus led a customer onboarding team. At the start of the year, he built what his own manager called an unusually strong plan. It set clear objectives for reducing the time a new customer took to become fully active. It included a sensible reorganization of who owned each stage of onboarding. And his team genuinely bought in. They liked the new approach, and adopted it enthusiastically. What Marcus did not build was any regular way of measuring whether the new approach was working. Things felt smoother, and nobody raised urgent complaints. So he assumed the plan was succeeding, and turned to other priorities. Five months later, a routine company-wide review of onboarding times told a different story. His team had actually gotten slower over the period, not faster. It was a side effect of the reorganization. Nobody noticed, because nobody was measuring the objective the plan set out to improve. Marcus had not failed at planning, organizing, or leading. All three had gone reasonably well. What was missing was controlling. A standard tied to the original objective, and a regular comparison against it. Without it, five months passed before the loop back to planning could even begin.
About Principles of Management at UPI Study
Principles of Management (Business 101) is a self-paced online course of 117 video lessons in 17 chapters, from the classical schools and the four management functions to leadership, motivation, change, human resources, strategy and ethics. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Principles of Management with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Principles of Management carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Planning, Organizing, Leading, and Controlling: The Management Cycle
What are the four functions of management?
Why are the management functions described as a cycle rather than a sequence?
What happens when a team is missing one of the four management functions?
How does the weight of planning, organizing, leading, and controlling differ across management levels?
About the Principles of Management course
How many college credits is Principles of Management?
How much does Principles of Management cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Principles of Management take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Principles of Management.
117 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →