UPI Study › Courses › Principles of Management › Free lessons › Lesson 14.2 Free with a free account
Crafting Strategy: Frameworks, Models, and Business Environments
Principles of Management · Chapter 14: Strategic Management and Decision-MakingSection 14.2 · lesson 96 of 11712 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Principles of Management.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Principles of Management
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: How Decisions Get Made: The Managerial Decision Process →← The Strategic Management Process: From Vision to ExecutionNext lesson: How Decisions Get Made: The Managerial Decision Process →
In this lesson
Frameworks, models, and business environments.
- Apply PESTEL and the 5 forces with real discipline
- Build and convert a SWOT analysis
- Describe the generic competitive positions
- Integrate environment and capability, and know the frameworks' limit
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,495 words). Read along, or search it.
Strategic Management and Decision-Making
Crafting Strategy
Before an organization chooses a strategy, it has to understand its situation. But understanding isn't the same as cataloging everything. This section covers the principal frameworks for analyzing the business environment, and the organization's own capability. We'll use PESTEL with real discipline, and diagnose an industry with the five competitive forces. We'll make SWOT analysis useful, and convert it into strategic direction. We'll test resources and competences, and describe the generic competitive positions. We'll integrate environment and capability, and face the limit every framework shares. And we'll see a mission statement that was wrongly listed as a strength.
Environmental Scanning
PESTEL: 6 Factors, 3 Questions Each
Start with the task itself. The goal is to understand the external environment and internal capability well enough to make a defensible choice. It isn't to catalog every fact about an organization and its surroundings. It's to gather what a genuine choice requires. The general environment is analyzed across six factors, commonly organized as PESTEL. Political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental. The discipline that makes it useful isn't listing items under each letter. It's assessing three things for each factor. First, materiality. Does it matter enough to affect the choice at hand? Second, direction. Which way is it moving? And third, timing. How soon will its effect be felt? A PESTEL list with no assessment of those three dimensions is a collection of facts. It isn't an analysis.
Industry Analysis
The 5 Competitive Forces (Porter)
Industry-level analysis uses the five competitive forces, developed by Michael Porter. Rivalry among existing competitors is raised by many similarly sized competitors, slow industry growth, and high fixed costs. The threat of new entrants rises where barriers to entry are low. That means modest capital requirements, easy access to distribution, and no strong brand loyalty to overcome. The threat of substitutes rises where a genuinely different product or service can meet the same underlying need. Buyer power rises where buyers are concentrated, purchase in large volumes, or can switch suppliers easily. Supplier power rises where suppliers are concentrated, or supply something the buyer can't easily substitute. In each case, the reverse conditions lower the force. And the overall logic is consistent. Each force, when raised, implies lower industry profitability. A stronger force extracts more value from the industry, toward whichever party holds it.
Figure 14.2.1
From Checklist to Diagnosis
Figure fourteen point two point one arranges the forces around industry rivalry, at the center. New entrants, substitutes, supplier power, and buyer power all bear down on that rivalry. The figure applies the framework to the industry of a fictional firm, Harborline Manufacturing. One force is marked in gold, as the force most constraining profitability. Here, it's supplier power. That marking is the important move. Listing all five forces, with something under each, is only a checklist. Identifying which single force is strongest in a given industry turns the checklist into a diagnosis. It tells you where the profitability pressure is actually coming from.
SWOT, Done With Discipline
4 Requirements for a Useful SWOT
SWOT analysis organizes findings into strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. It's easy to do superficially. Four requirements make it useful. First, evidence for each entry. Every item is backed by something specific and checkable, not simply asserted. Second, relative rather than absolute claims. Each entry is stated against competitors or industry norms. Good customer service, for instance, means nothing without a comparison point. Third, a limited number of items per category, which forces genuine prioritization. Fourth, avoiding the classification errors that destroy the analysis. One is placing an internal item externally, like treating the organization's own weak process as an external threat. That misdiagnoses where the fix actually belongs. The other is recording an aspiration as a strength, listing what the organization wishes were true as though it already were. That error corrupts the entire analysis from the start.
Converting SWOT Into Strategy
The Pairing Is Where the Analysis Works
SWOT becomes useful only once it's converted through paired analysis. Left as four separate lists, it produces no actual conclusion. Strengths paired with opportunities suggest where to invest aggressively. Weaknesses paired with threats show where the organization is genuinely exposed, and must defend. Strengths paired with threats suggest where existing capability can blunt an external danger. Weaknesses paired with opportunities show where a capability gap is costing a chance the organization could otherwise pursue. The pairing is where the analysis does its work. Each pairing turns a description of the situation into a direction for action.
Table 14.2.1
A Completed SWOT, With Its Evidence
Table fourteen point two point one shows a completed SWOT for a fictional company, Harborline Manufacturing. Notice that every entry states its evidence source, rather than standing as an unsupported assertion. The strength is a lower unit production cost than the three largest competitors. The evidence is internal cost accounting, compared against published competitor pricing. The weakness is a slower new-product introduction cycle than the industry norm. That comes from internal product launch records, compared against trade publication averages. The opportunity is a growing customer segment, currently underserved by competitors. An independent market research report supports it. And the threat is a new substitute technology gaining adoption in an adjacent market. The evidence is industry trade press coverage over the past two years. Each entry is also relative. Lower than competitors, slower than the norm, underserved by rivals.
Internal Capability
Resources and Core Competence
Turning inward, the resource-based view analyzes an organization's internal capability. It tests each resource against four criteria. Is it valuable? Is it rare? Is it difficult to imitate? And is it organizationally supported? A resource meeting all four tests is positioned to sustain a genuine competitive advantage. A resource lacking even one is not, however impressive it sounds. A closely related idea is core competence. Core competence is what an organization is distinctively good at, as distinguished from what it merely does. Every organization does many things. Only some of them rise to a genuine, distinctive competence that others find difficult to replicate. The distinction exists to prevent a common error: confusing broad activity with genuine distinctive strength.
Generic Competitive Positions
3 Basic Ways to Compete
Three generic competitive positions describe the basic ways an organization can compete. Cost leadership competes primarily on price. It requires operational discipline, scale, and tight control of expense. Differentiation requires genuine, valued distinctiveness, in product, service, or brand. The test is whether customers will actually pay a premium for it. Focus targets a narrow market segment, rather than the broader market the other two positions aim at. It requires deep understanding of that segment, and service tailored to it. And that raises a question. Can one organization hold two of these positions at once?
A Contested Claim, No Side Taken
Stuck in the Middle?
Can an organization pursue cost leadership and differentiation at the same time? The stuck-in-the-middle argument says it typically achieves neither well. The reason is that the operational requirements of each position pull in genuinely different directions. The counter-argument says some organizations do achieve both at once. That's especially likely where operational innovation allows a genuinely lower cost structure, without sacrificing distinctiveness. Both positions have real defenders, and this course takes no side between them. One more framing applies to organizations with several businesses. It's the product portfolio framing. It's named here by its logic, not developed as a full model. It allocates investment across businesses according to each one's growth prospects and competitive position. Businesses differ in how much investment they warrant, and how much cash they generate. A deliberate portfolio view avoids treating every business unit identically, regardless of those real differences.
Integrating the Frameworks
Environment, Capability, and the Limit They Share
A complete analysis integrates environment and capability, rather than treating them separately. The environment identifies opportunity and threat. Capability identifies what the organization can actually act on. Reconciliation becomes necessary whenever the two point in different directions. One case is an attractive opportunity that the organization genuinely lacks the capability to pursue. The other is a strong capability, with no matching opportunity in the environment to apply it toward. Finally, every framework in this section shares the same fundamental limit. It organizes thinking. It doesn't produce a choice. PESTEL, the five forces, SWOT, and the resource-based view each structure the information a decision requires. None of them, on its own, tells an organization what to decide. That remaining step of judgment belongs to the decision-making process in Subchapter fourteen point three.
Case Vignette
A Mission Statement Listed as a Strength
Here's a composite case, constructed for instruction. Harborline Manufacturing's leadership team produced a SWOT analysis ahead of a strategic planning session. Its top strength read: our strong mission of quality and customer focus. A colleague reviewing the draft pointed out the problem. The entry described an aspiration the organization held for itself, not an evidenced fact about its performance against competitors. No comparison data supported it. And almost any competitor might claim much the same about its own mission. So the entry was removed, and replaced with the organization's actual, evidenced advantage. That was a documented lower defect rate than its three largest competitors, drawn from internal quality records. The strategy discussion shifted meaningfully, away from a vague conversation about living up to stated values. Instead, the group asked how to turn a real quality advantage into a differentiation position, one competitors couldn't easily match. Next, Subchapter fourteen point three turns to the remaining step: how the decision itself actually gets made.
About Principles of Management at UPI Study
Principles of Management (Business 101) is a self-paced online course of 117 video lessons in 17 chapters, from the classical schools and the four management functions to leadership, motivation, change, human resources, strategy and ethics. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Principles of Management with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Principles of Management carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Crafting Strategy: Frameworks, Models, and Business Environments
What is PESTEL analysis and how do you make it useful?
What are Porter's five competitive forces?
How do you turn a SWOT analysis into a strategy?
What are the generic competitive strategies of cost leadership, differentiation, and focus?
About the Principles of Management course
How many college credits is Principles of Management?
How much does Principles of Management cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Principles of Management take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Principles of Management.
117 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →