UPI Study › Courses › Principles of Management › Free lessons › Lesson 16.1 Free with a free account
Managing Across Borders: What Global Leaders Actually Do
Principles of Management · Chapter 16: Global Management and Cultural DiversitySection 16.1 · lesson 104 of 11711 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Principles of Management.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Principles of Management
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: The Global Manager's Toolkit: Traits That Travel Well →← Meeting the Global Standard: The ISO 9000 Certification ProcessNext lesson: The Global Manager's Toolkit: Traits That Travel Well →
In this lesson
What global leaders actually do.
- Describe what distinguishes international management
- Identify the added complexity across borders
- Describe the 4 functions as they operate internationally
- Compare staffing approaches and expatriate assignment
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,370 words). Read along, or search it.
Global Management and Cultural Diversity
Managing Across Borders
A manager who runs one site well is often asked to run several, in several countries. The question is what actually changes when she crosses a border. This section defines international management, and corrects a common misunderstanding about it. We'll map the sources of added complexity, and see how each management function gets harder. We'll introduce the tension between global integration and local responsiveness. Then we'll compare three staffing approaches, and look at expatriate assignments, including the most neglected stage. We'll end with what doesn't change across borders. And with a uniform process that didn't fit a non-uniform market.
International Management
The Same Functions, Made Harder
International management is management where the organization operates across national boundaries. That sounds simple. The point worth stating precisely is what it changes. Crossing borders changes the difficulty of every function. It doesn't add a separate function. International management isn't a fifth management function, sitting alongside the other four. Planning, organizing, leading, and controlling are the same four functions this course has already covered. What differs is the conditions they operate under. Those conditions are harder, in ways a purely domestic manager never faces. That framing matters, because it tells you where to start. You don't need a new discipline. You need to know what makes the familiar one harder.
Sources of Complexity
What Crossing a Border Adds
Several sources add this complexity. Legal and regulatory differences mean the same decision can be routine in one country, and prohibited in another. Economic and market differences mean demand, competition, and pricing logic can vary substantially from market to market. Political risk is the possibility that government action disrupts operations. That action might be a policy change, instability, or expropriation. A stable domestic environment doesn't threaten those. Currency and financial complexity adds exchange rate exposure, and cross-border financial mechanics. A purely domestic operation never encounters either. Infrastructure and logistics vary in reliability and capability across markets. Language creates a direct barrier to accurate communication. Distance and time zones complicate coordination, and slow the pace of exchange. And cultural difference adds a further layer, affecting how people expect to work together. That one is developed fully in Subchapter sixteen point six.
The 4 Functions (2.1)
Each Function, Under Harder Conditions
Each of the four management functions, introduced in Subchapter two point one, operates under harder conditions internationally. Planning works with more uncertain information, and longer horizons. Forecasting demand, regulation, and political conditions across several markets is less reliable than planning for one familiar market. Organizing spans jurisdictions and time zones. It connects to the network and matrix structures from Subchapter seven point seven. Those become considerably more complex once the units being coordinated sit in different countries, under different laws. Leading operates across cultural expectations about authority and participation, and those differ from one workforce to the next. Controlling faces a subtler problem. Local information is filtered by distance, and by the incentives of local management, before it ever reaches headquarters. So a distant manager receives less reliable information than one overseeing a nearby, familiar operation.
Table 16.1.1
Practical Responses, Function by Function
Table sixteen point one point one pairs each function's added complexity with a practical response. For planning, the response is scenario-based plans, rather than a single forecast. And those plans should be revisited more frequently. For organizing, design the structure deliberately for cross-border coordination. Don't simply extend a domestic structure unchanged. For leading, adapt your approach to what the local workforce actually expects. The key word is informed. The adaptation should rest on knowledge, not assumption. For controlling, build direct information channels, and visit in person. Relying solely on filtered reports means relying on whatever local incentives let through. Notice the common thread. Each response replaces a domestic default with a deliberate choice.
Headquarters and Subsidiary
A Standing Tension
The headquarters-subsidiary relationship carries a standing tension. On one side is global integration, coordinating operations uniformly across the organization. On the other is local responsiveness, adapting to the specific conditions of each market. Both are legitimate goals, and they pull in opposite directions. This tension is the organizing problem of the whole field of international management. It's developed fully in Subchapter sixteen point four. Here, it's introduced as the backdrop for every other topic in this chapter. Whatever the topic, the same question keeps returning. Where does this decision sit, between integration and responsiveness?
Figure 16.1.1
4 Decisions, 4 Positions
Figure sixteen point one point one turns that tension into two axes, for four decisions at Harborline Manufacturing. Global integration runs along the bottom. Local responsiveness runs up the side. Core product specification sits high on integration, and low on responsiveness. It's held uniform across markets. Brand standards also sit high on integration. They're kept consistent worldwide. HR policy and benefits sit toward responsiveness, because they follow local labor law. Local marketing messaging sits in nearly the opposite position to the core product. It's adapted to each market. The lesson is in the spread. Different decisions within the same organization sit in very different positions, at the same time. So the tension isn't settled once, for the whole organization. It's resolved decision by decision.
Staffing Approaches
A Trade-Off Between Control and Knowledge
Three staffing approaches fill international roles. Each represents a different trade-off between control and knowledge. Parent-country nationals are employees from the organization's home country, sent abroad. They offer strong control, and cultural alignment with headquarters. The cost is limited local market knowledge. Host-country nationals are local employees, in the country of operation. They offer strong local knowledge and relationships. The cost is potentially weaker alignment with headquarters' own way of operating. Third-country nationals come from neither the home country nor the host country. They often bring broad international experience that can bridge the other two approaches. The cost is that they fully possess neither party's specific local or organizational knowledge. So no approach is free. Each buys one kind of strength with another kind of gap.
Expatriate Assignment
Sending Someone Abroad, and Back
An expatriate assignment sends an employee to work in another country. It carries real costs beyond salary. There's relocation, and there's cultural adjustment. And when an assignment goes wrong, there's the cost of an early return. Assignments end early for several recurring reasons. Inadequate preparation is one. Another is a family member or partner having difficulty adjusting. A third is a genuine mismatch between the assignee's capability and what the role actually required. And occasionally, a change in business need removes the reason for the assignment altogether. Then there's repatriation, the return home at the end of the assignment. It's the most neglected stage of the whole process. Organizations invest heavily in sending someone abroad, and in preparing her for that transition. They invest comparatively little in bringing her back. And little in reintegrating the capability she developed while she was away.
Careers and Constants
The Ceiling, and What Does Not Change
Staffing choices also shape careers. Some approaches create a genuine career ceiling for local managers. Suppose an organization consistently reserves its most senior international roles for parent-country nationals. Whether it intends to or not, it signals a limit. A capable host-country national can only advance so far there, regardless of her demonstrated performance. Finally, it's worth stating plainly what doesn't change across borders. The underlying management functions stay the same. So do the fundamentals of motivation and coordination. International management is sometimes presented, misleadingly, as an entirely different discipline with its own logic. It's more accurately the same discipline, operating under harder conditions. That's why this chapter builds on the functions, structures, and leadership concepts already developed, rather than replacing them.
Case Vignette
A Uniform Process for a Non-Uniform Market
Here's a composite case, constructed for instruction. Harborline Manufacturing's headquarters mandated an identical supplier-approval process, across every subsidiary worldwide. That included a newly acquired subsidiary, operating under a different regulatory regime. That regime required documentation the headquarters process had never anticipated. The local team spent months, trying to force its genuinely different regulatory reality into a process built for headquarters. The result was delays, and a stream of exceptions. By the time local staff had adapted around it informally, the supposedly standardized process was barely recognizable. Headquarters had resolved the tension in favor of uniform global integration. But this was a process where local regulatory difference genuinely mattered enough to warrant responsiveness. The mandated uniformity produced no real efficiency gain. The process ended up working differently in practice anyway. Meanwhile, it cost the subsidiary months of friction, which a locally adapted process would have avoided from the outset. Next, Subchapter sixteen point two turns to the specific competencies that predict effectiveness in an international role.
About Principles of Management at UPI Study
Principles of Management (Business 101) is a self-paced online course of 117 video lessons in 17 chapters, from the classical schools and the four management functions to leadership, motivation, change, human resources, strategy and ethics. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Principles of Management with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Principles of Management carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Managing Across Borders: What Global Leaders Actually Do
What is international management and how is it different from domestic management?
What makes managing a business across borders more complex?
What is the difference between parent-country, host-country, and third-country nationals?
Why do expatriate assignments end early?
About the Principles of Management course
How many college credits is Principles of Management?
How much does Principles of Management cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Principles of Management take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Principles of Management.
117 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →