UPI Study › Courses › Principles of Management › Free lessons › Lesson 3.4 Free with a free account
Visualizing Workflows: Henry Gantt's Charts and Planning Tools
Principles of Management · Chapter 3: The Classical Era of Management ThoughtSection 3.4 · lesson 10 of 11711 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Principles of Management.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Principles of Management
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Fayol's 14 Principles: Structuring Work and Supporting Staff →← Scientific Management in Practice: Taylor's Quest for EfficiencyNext lesson: Fayol's 14 Principles: Structuring Work and Supporting Staff →
In this lesson
A chart that sets plan against progress, and a fairer incentive.
- Describe the Gantt chart and what it makes visible
- Name what a basic chart does not show well
- Read a chart: what is behind, blocked, or has slack
- Compare Gantt's task and bonus system with Taylor's
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,645 words). Read along, or search it.
The Classical Era of Management Thought
Visualizing Workflows: Henry Gantt's Charts and Planning Tools
Most of us have seen a Gantt chart, even if we never knew its name. Horizontal bars march across a calendar, one for each piece of a project. That chart came out of the same movement as Taylor's stopwatch. In this section we meet its inventor, Henry Gantt. First, we look at what the chart makes visible, and what it quietly leaves out. Second, we practice reading one, asking what is behind, what is blocked, and where there is slack. And third, we compare Gantt's incentive scheme with Taylor's. The difference says a lot about how each man saw the worker.
Inside the Movement
Taylor's Colleague, With a Difference
Henry Gantt worked closely with Frederick Winslow Taylor. He belongs squarely within the scientific management movement from Subchapter three point three. He shared its commitment to measurement, to standards, and to systematic method. But his emphasis diverged from Taylor's in two specific and lasting ways. The first concerns how the worker was treated under an incentive system. We will compare his scheme directly with Taylor's differential piece rate. The second is about training. Gantt insisted that training a worker to reach the standard was a genuine obligation, owed by the manager to the worker. It was not merely a means to the manager's own goal of higher output. Keep both differences in mind. They make Gantt more than a footnote to Taylor.
The Gantt Chart
Plan and Progress on One Page
The Gantt chart is a scheduling tool, and its layout is simple. The project's activities run down the vertical axis. Time runs along the horizontal axis. Each activity is a horizontal bar. The length of the bar shows its planned duration. Its position shows when it is scheduled to start, and when it should finish. Here is the subtle part. Gantt's real innovation was not the bar itself. It was what the format made visible at a glance, the relationship between planned progress and actual progress. A second bar, or shading, could be added beneath or within the planned bar. That showed how much of the activity had actually been completed by a given date. So a manager could see, in a single chart, whether the whole project was on schedule. There was no need to read a separate written status report for every activity.
Strengths and Limits
What the Chart Shows, and What It Hides
A Gantt chart shows four things clearly. Sequence, the order in which activities are planned to happen. Duration, how long each activity is expected to take. Overlap, where two or more activities are scheduled to run at the same time. And progress against plan, whether an activity is ahead, on schedule, or behind, as of a given date. Now for what it does not show well, and this matters just as much. It struggles with dependencies in a complex network, meaning which activities must finish before another can begin. It misses resource constraints, such as one specialized team being needed by two overlapping activities. And it does not show how a delay in one activity spreads downstream, through everything that depends on it. That gap is exactly why network-based scheduling techniques were developed later. They build in the dependency logic the basic chart does not capture. This course covers one of them, the critical path method, in Subchapter fourteen point five.
Later Refinements
Milestones and Dependency Lines
Later refinements closed part of that gap. The first was the milestone. A milestone is a single point in time that marks a significant event, such as a regulatory approval, or a client sign-off. It has no duration, so it appears as a distinct marker rather than a bar. The second refinement was the explicit dependency. This is a connecting line, drawn from a finishing activity to the one that cannot begin until it completes. Together, these moved the basic chart part of the way toward the network techniques. Which brings us to one concept we will name now, and develop later. The critical path is the specific sequence of dependent activities that determines the shortest possible project time. Subchapter fourteen point five takes it up in full. For now, just hold the idea that some activities matter more to the finish date than others.
Figure 3.4.1
A 5-Activity Renovation Project
Here is a Gantt chart for a fictional renovation project, with five activities. They are site preparation, foundation, framing, electrical work, and finishing. The weeks run left to right, and each activity has a planned bar. Beneath each planned bar sits the actual progress so far. Today is the start of week six. Site preparation is complete, and on track. Foundation, in gold, is running a full week behind its planned bar. Framing has not started yet. It was scheduled to begin the week after Foundation was originally due to finish. That relationship, between a late Foundation and a waiting Framing, is the one our case turns on.
Reading a Chart
3 Questions, in Order
Reading a Gantt chart well means answering three questions, in order. First, which activity is behind? Compare each activity's actual bar with its planned bar, as of today's date. Any activity whose actual bar has not reached the point its planned bar has reached is behind schedule. Second, which activity cannot start? An activity scheduled to begin only after a delayed one finishes cannot begin on its original date. That holds where the chart shows a genuine sequential relationship, rather than a coincidental one. Third, how much slack is available? Slack is how long an activity could be delayed without pushing back its dependents, or the overall finish date. This is where the same delay can mean very different things. Two parallel activities that do not feed each other can absorb a delay, if enough slack exists elsewhere. But a delay on the sequence feeding the project's final milestone has no such cushion.
Gantt's Incentive
The Task and Bonus System
Now to Gantt's incentive scheme, known as the task and bonus system. Every worker received a guaranteed day rate. That is a fixed wage, paid regardless of output. On top of that guaranteed wage came a bonus, for meeting the scientifically determined standard. The significant difference from Taylor lies in what happened to a worker who fell short. Under Gantt's system, that worker still received the full day rate. They lost only the bonus. Under Taylor's differential piece rate, a worker below standard was paid a markedly lower rate per unit. That could leave their total pay substantially reduced. Think about who carries the risk when a new, ambitious standard is introduced. Gantt shifted a meaningful share of that risk away from the individual worker. He moved it back toward the organization, which had set the standard in the first place.
Side by Side
Taylor and Gantt Compared
Set the two schemes side by side, and three contrasts stand out. Start with the worker's risk. Under Taylor, exposure to falling short is total. Pay drops sharply below standard, and there is no guaranteed floor. Under Gantt, the risk is limited, because the day rate is paid whether or not the standard is met. Next, the incentive itself. Taylor offered a significantly higher per-unit rate for meeting or exceeding the standard. Gantt offered a bonus, added on top of the guaranteed rate, for meeting it. Finally, the supervisor's role. Under Taylor, the supervisor mainly enforced the method and the standard, as designed by the planning department. Under Gantt, the supervisor was explicitly rewarded for training workers up to the standard, not only for enforcing it.
The Supervisor's Job
Rewarded for Training, Not Just Output
That last contrast deserves its own moment. Gantt went further than redesigning the incentive. He argued that a supervisor should be rewarded for training workers to reach the standard. Not just rewarded for the output that the existing workforce happened to produce. Before this, training was an unrewarded prerequisite. A supervisor did it incidentally, on the way to enforcing output. Gantt reframed the job. Supervising now included a genuine developmental obligation toward subordinates. That idea arrived several decades before its time. It anticipates much later thinking about a manager's responsibility to develop the people reporting to her. This course returns to that thinking when it covers motivation and leadership in later chapters.
Case Vignette
Does This Delay Actually Matter?
Let's return to the renovation chart, with a composite case constructed for instruction. Priya managed the project, and she reviewed the chart at the start of week six. She saw exactly what the figure shows. Foundation was a full week behind. Framing, Electrical, and Finishing had not yet started. Her first instinct was to treat the delay as an emergency, and escalate it immediately. Before doing that, she checked the chart's dependency logic, instead of reacting to the delay in isolation. Framing could not begin until Foundation was fully complete. Electrical and Finishing each waited, in turn, for their own predecessor to finish. So every remaining activity sat on a single dependent sequence, with no parallel path and no slack anywhere. That put Foundation's delay on the critical path. Unless it was recovered downstream, the whole project would finish a full week late. Notice what her real judgment call was. The chart already showed plainly that a delay had occurred. Her skill was reading what that delay meant, given the dependencies behind it.
Check Yourself
Shown Well, or Not?
Let's finish by testing what a basic Gantt chart can and cannot tell you. How many weeks an activity is scheduled to take? The chart shows that well. It is the bar's length. Whether two activities are scheduled to overlap? Also shown well. Whether an activity has fallen behind its planned progress as of today? Shown well. That was Gantt's real innovation. Whether two overlapping activities are competing for the same specialized crew? Not shown well. That is a resource constraint. And how a two-week delay affects an activity three steps downstream, in a complex network? Not shown well either. So when is a basic chart enough? A simple renovation, where each activity depends only on the one before, is well served by it. A product launch with twenty interdependent activities, and teams sharing constrained specialists, needs a network technique. Next, Subchapter three point five turns to Henri Fayol's fourteen principles, and the structure of the whole organization.
About Principles of Management at UPI Study
Principles of Management (Business 101) is a self-paced online course of 117 video lessons in 17 chapters, from the classical schools and the four management functions to leadership, motivation, change, human resources, strategy and ethics. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Principles of Management with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Principles of Management carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Visualizing Workflows: Henry Gantt's Charts and Planning Tools
What is a Gantt chart?
What are the limitations of a Gantt chart?
How do you read a Gantt chart to find delays and slack?
How was Gantt's task and bonus system different from Taylor's differential piece rate?
About the Principles of Management course
How many college credits is Principles of Management?
How much does Principles of Management cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Principles of Management take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Principles of Management.
117 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →