Believe You Can: Attribution Theory in the Classroom

UPI Study › Courses › Educational Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 6.4 Free with a free account

Believe You Can: Attribution Theory in the Classroom

Educational Psychology · Chapter 6: Motivation, Goals, and the Drive to LearnSection 6.4 · lesson 51 of 1009 min · free with a free account

← Meeting Students Where They Are: Maslow's HierarchyNext lesson: Do I Want This? Can I Do This? Expectancy-Value Theory →

Earn 3 college credits for Educational PsychologyRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Psychology 120 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Educational Psychology · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

Three dimensions of explanation, and the feedback that shapes them.

  • Explain Weiner's three dimensions of causal attribution
  • Identify the adaptive attribution pattern for students
  • Contrast process praise with person praise
  • Apply attribution retraining to a fixed-ability belief

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,070 words). Read along, or search it.

Motivation, Goals, and the Drive to Learn

Believe You Can: Attribution Theory in the Classroom

Two students fail the same test by the same margin. One says, I didn't study the right things. The other says, I'm just bad at this. Those two students will behave completely differently next month. This section covers attribution theory. It is about how students explain their own successes and failures. We will cover Weiner's three dimensions of attribution. Then locus of control, and the difference between process and person praise. And attribution retraining, which is a teachable intervention. The explanation a student gives matters more than the outcome itself.

Attribution Theory

How Students Explain What Happened

Attribution theory was developed by Bernard Weiner. Through the nineteen seventies and eighties. It examines how individuals explain the causes of their outcomes. Particularly success, and particularly failure. Those causal explanations, or attributions, do three things. They influence emotional responses. They influence expectations for future performance. And they influence behavioral choices. Watch the difference between two explanations of one failure. A student fails an exam and attributes it to insufficient effort. She feels guilt, and is likely to study harder next time. The same student attributes the same failure to low ability. Now she feels shame, and is likely to reduce future engagement.

Dimension One

Locus of Causality

Weiner proposed three dimensions along which attributions vary. The first is locus of causality. Is the cause internal to the person, or external to them? Internal causes include ability, effort, and mood. External causes include task difficulty, luck, and teacher bias. And there is a genuine trade-off here. Internal attributions for failure produce shame, or guilt. External attributions may protect self-esteem. But they also reduce personal agency. So neither direction is simply better than the other. It is not the case that internal attributions are always healthy. What matters is which internal cause gets named.

Dimensions Two And Three

Stability and Controllability

The second dimension is stability. Is the cause relatively fixed over time, or variable? Ability and task difficulty are stable. Effort, mood and luck are unstable. The third dimension is controllability. Is the cause something the person can change, or not? Effort and strategy are controllable. Inherent ability and teacher attitudes are not. And each dimension predicts something specific. Stable attributions for failure predict continued failure. They undermine the motivation to try at all. Uncontrollable attributions breed helplessness. Controllable attributions support motivational effort.

Key Idea

The Adaptive Pattern

Here is the key idea, and it is a target pattern. The most adaptive attribution style has two halves. Attribute success to effort and strategy. That is internal, unstable and controllable. And attribute failure to insufficient effort or strategy. Rather than to fixed ability. This style supports persistence, agency, and a growth mindset. Now notice the asymmetry it deliberately builds in. Success is credited to the student themselves. Failure is assigned to something the student can change. Both halves point toward the same conclusion. What you do matters. Which is the belief worth installing.

Six Attributions

Dimensions, Emotion, and Motivation

Six common attributions, classified on all three dimensions. High ability. Internal, stable, uncontrollable. The emotion is pride, and the motivational effect is only moderate. It is fragile, because it collapses if ever threatened. High effort. Internal, unstable, controllable. Pride and satisfaction, with a high motivational effect. Easy task. External, stable, uncontrollable. The emotion is relief. Low motivational effect, because it provides no agency. Good luck. External, unstable, uncontrollable. Surprise, and low effect. Low effort. Internal, unstable, controllable. Guilt. Moderate effect, and it can redirect a student to try harder. And low ability. Internal, stable, uncontrollable. Shame. Very low motivational effect. This one leads directly to helplessness.

Locus Of Control

Rotter's Related Concept

A related concept comes from Julian Rotter. Locus of control. It refers to how far individuals believe they control outcomes. An internal locus means outcomes follow from your own actions. An external locus means outcomes come from luck, fate, or powerful others. Students with an internal locus show greater academic motivation. They take more responsibility for their learning. And they respond more productively to failure. Students with an external locus feel their efforts have little impact. Which can produce learned helplessness, and disengagement. One caution about how to read that. An external locus is often a reasonable conclusion from a student's history. It is a belief formed from evidence, and it changes when the evidence does.

Feedback

Process Praise Versus Person Praise

Teacher feedback shapes attribution patterns directly. Feedback that links outcomes to effort and strategy fosters internal, unstable, controllable attributions. Which is exactly the adaptive pattern. Compare two kinds of praise. Process praise sounds like this. You really worked through that systematically. Person praise sounds like this. You're so smart. As Carol Dweck's research shows, the second can backfire. It ironically undermines motivation, by creating a fixed-ability mindset. The compliment installs a belief about who the student is. And that belief is what makes the next failure devastating.

Retraining

Learned Optimism

Attribution patterns can be changed deliberately. Martin Seligman developed the concept of learned optimism. It can be cultivated through systematic attribution retraining. The process has three steps. Recognize. Help students notice their own explanatory style. Notice it specifically, when something has gone wrong. Challenge. Test whether that explanation actually fits the evidence. Usually it does not, on inspection. Reframe. Replace pessimistic explanations with controllable ones. And the goal here is accuracy, not positivity. You are not insisting a student did well when they did not. You are locating the real cause in something changeable.

In Practice

I'm Just Not a Good Writer

Watch a teacher intervene on an attribution in real time. She returns a graded writing assignment. And several students with low grades say the same thing. I'm just not a good writer. Classify that sentence on the three dimensions. Internal. Stable. Uncontrollable. That is the worst combination available, and it predicts disengagement. She does not accept the framing. Instead she gives individualized feedback attributing each error to strategy. Your argument weakened here because you didn't cite evidence. Let's work on that skill together. That moves failure from ability to strategy. From a fact about the student to a thing that can be worked on.

Five Strategies

Promoting Adaptive Attributions

Five strategies for promoting adaptive attributions. Use process-focused feedback. Your strategy worked well here. Normalize struggle as an ordinary part of learning. Explicitly teach effort and strategy as controllable factors. Use attribution retraining with students who hold fixed-ability beliefs. And model your own adaptive attributions when you face difficulty. That last one is the cheapest, and the rarest. It costs nothing and almost nobody does it. Say out loud that a lesson did not work. Then name specifically what you will change about it. That teaches attribution more efficiently than any amount of explaining the theory to students.

About Educational Psychology at UPI Study

Educational Psychology (Psychology 120) is a self-paced online course of 100 video lessons in 11 chapters, from memory, conditioning and child development to motivation, individual differences, assessment, instruction and educational technology. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →

Why take it here

Why students take Educational Psychology with UPI Study

How people learn, and how to teach themEducational Psychology explains how students learn, develop and stay motivated, and how teachers assess and support them. It is a standard course in education and teaching degrees and a common psychology elective.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Educational Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Believe You Can: Attribution Theory in the Classroom

What are Weiner's three dimensions of attribution?
Bernard Weiner proposed that explanations for success and failure vary along three dimensions: locus of causality (internal or external), stability (fixed or variable over time) and controllability (changeable by the person or not). For example, ability is internal, stable and uncontrollable, while effort is internal, unstable and controllable. Each dimension shapes a student's emotions, expectations for future performance and later choices.
What is the most adaptive attribution style for students?
The most adaptive style credits success to effort and strategy and explains failure as insufficient effort or a poor strategy rather than fixed ability. Both causes are internal, unstable and controllable, so either way the student concludes that what they do matters. This pattern supports persistence, a sense of agency and a growth mindset, while blaming failure on low ability leads to shame and disengagement.
What is the difference between process praise and person praise?
Process praise credits how a student worked, such as "You really worked through that systematically," while person praise labels the student, such as "You're so smart." Carol Dweck's research suggests person praise can backfire by encouraging a fixed-ability mindset, which makes the next failure feel like proof of low ability. Process praise links outcomes to effort and strategy instead.
How does attribution retraining work?
Attribution retraining teaches students to change how they explain setbacks, an approach linked to Martin Seligman's idea of learned optimism. It has three steps: recognize the explanation a student gives when something goes wrong, challenge whether it fits the evidence, and reframe it toward a controllable cause. The goal is accuracy, not empty positivity, so "I'm just not a good writer" becomes "my argument needed cited evidence."

About the Educational Psychology course

How many college credits is Educational Psychology?
Educational Psychology (Psychology 120) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Educational Psychology cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 100 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Educational Psychology take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 100 lessons total about 15 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Educational Psychology.

100 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Educational Psychology →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Educational Psychology
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →