UPI Study › Courses › Educational Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 3.9 Free with a free account
When Students Act Out: Understanding Difficult Behaviors
Educational Psychology · Chapter 3: Behavior, Conditioning, and Classroom ManagementSection 3.9 · lesson 27 of 1009 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Educational Psychology.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Educational Psychology
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Growing Up: What Changes and What Shapes Us →← Keeping It Together: Practical Classroom Discipline StrategiesNext lesson: Growing Up: What Changes and What Shapes Us →
In this lesson
Function, ABC analysis, replacement behaviors, and de-escalation.
- Name the four functions of behavior in the FAST model
- Record an ABC observation in objective language
- Design a replacement behavior that meets the efficiency test
- Distinguish de-escalation from capitulation
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,162 words). Read along, or search it.
Behavior, Conditioning, and Classroom Management
When Students Act Out: Understanding Difficult Behaviors
A student disrupts the lesson every single day, and nothing works. Consequences do not work. Conversations do not work. The reason is usually that nobody has asked what the behavior is for. We will look at the four functions behavior can serve. Then at ABC analysis, which is how you identify which one applies. Then at replacement behaviors, and why most of them fail. And at de-escalation, including where the line sits between that and giving in. The organizing idea is that behavior is communication. Which is not a soft claim. It is a claim about what will actually change it.
Function
All Behavior Serves a Purpose
Applied behavior analysis rests on one cornerstone principle. All behavior serves a function for the individual displaying it. Including difficult behavior. Including disruptive behavior. Understanding that function is essential for designing real interventions. Interventions that are genuinely effective, rather than merely suppressive. Suppressing a behavior without addressing its function has two outcomes. Either the original behavior returns once the pressure is off. Or a new behavior emerges that serves the same underlying purpose. The new one is frequently worse than the original. So the useful question is never how do I stop this. It is what is this behavior getting for the student.
The FAST Model
Four Functions of Behavior
The FAST model names four primary behavioral functions. Attention. The behavior produces social attention from peers or adults. Avoidance or escape. The behavior removes the student from an aversive task, person or situation. Sensory. The behavior provides automatic sensory reinforcement. That one is unrelated to social consequences entirely. And tangibles. The behavior produces access to preferred items or activities. Most disruptive classroom behavior falls into attention or escape. Which makes those two the highest priority for functional analysis. Start there, and you will be right most of the time.
ABC Analysis
Antecedent, Behavior, Consequence
ABC analysis is the standard method for identifying function. It records three components through systematic observation. A is the antecedent. The event, condition or trigger that precedes the behavior. B is the behavior itself, described in objective, observable terms. C is the consequence. What happens immediately following the behavior. One observation tells you almost nothing, and this is where people stop. You need multiple ABC observations, across different settings and times. And it is the pattern, not the incident, that reveals the function.
Recording It
Describe, Do Not Interpret
ABC data collection is deceptively simple. Antecedents and consequences must be recorded in neutral language. Descriptive, rather than interpretive or evaluative. Compare two descriptions of the same moment. Student slammed book and put head on desk. That is objective. Student had a temper tantrum. That is an interpretation. The second one has already decided what happened. The same rule applies to the antecedent, and it matters just as much. Class started is a time, not a trigger. Teacher asked student to begin independent writing is a trigger. A vague antecedent produces a pattern you cannot act on.
Key Idea
Behavior Is Communication
Here is the key idea of this section. Every problem behavior is a communication. It tells you something the student needs. Attention. A break. Sensory input. Access to something preferred. Decode the message. Then teach the student a more appropriate way to meet the same need. Note carefully what this claim is not. It is not a claim that the behavior is acceptable. It is a claim about what will actually change it. You can disapprove of a behavior and still need to know its function. In fact you especially need to know it then.
Replacement Behavior
Same Function, Different Form
Teach a replacement behavior. That is an appropriate behavior serving the same function as the problem one. Take a student who disrupts class to escape difficult work. So the replacement might be raising a hand to request help. Or to request a brief break. The replacement must meet three conditions. It must be at least as efficient as the problem behavior. Efficient at accessing the same reinforcer, that is. It must be socially acceptable. And it must be within the student's current skill repertoire.
Efficiency
Why Replacements Fail
The efficiency requirement is where most replacement plans break. Shouting gets a break in two seconds. Reliably. The new hand signal takes four minutes, and sometimes gets missed. The student will keep shouting. That is not defiance, and it is not ingratitude. It is arithmetic, and the student is doing it correctly. So a replacement behavior has to be honored quickly and reliably. Especially in the first weeks, when the comparison is being made. The whole intervention rests on the new behavior working better. And the third condition matters too. A replacement that must first be learned is not available in the moment.
De-escalation
Reducing Intensity Before It Peaks
De-escalation is what you do when a crisis is already building. It means reducing the intensity of an emerging behavioral crisis. Reducing it before it reaches physical intervention or removal. Reduce demands temporarily. Use calm, low-affect language. Offer limited choices, rather than open ones or none. Provide personal space. And avoid public power struggles at all costs. Research is consistent about what makes things worse. Teacher responses that increase emotional intensity escalate the crisis. Raised voices. Public reprimands. Ultimatums. Every one of those feels like taking control, and does the opposite.
Four Functions
Signal, Mistake, and Response
Each function has a signal, a common mistake, and a better response. Attention. The signal is disrupting when not the center of attention. The mistake is providing attention after the disruption. The better response is reinforcing appropriate attention-seeking instead. Escape. The signal is acting out when tasks are assigned. The mistake is removing the task after a disruption. The better response is teaching break-requesting, and modifying difficulty. Sensory. The signal is self-stimulatory behavior during transitions. The mistake is punishing sensory behavior. The better response is providing sensory breaks and replacement input. Tangible. The signal is a meltdown when a preferred item is removed. The mistake is returning the item to stop the meltdown. The better response is teaching waiting and requesting, with visual schedules.
In Practice
Devon and the Yellow Card
Devon is an eighth grader. The antecedent is consistent. A writing task is assigned. The behavior follows. Loud comments, out of seat, provoking classmates. The consequence is also consistent. The teacher redirects him, providing brief one-on-one attention. So the function is attention-seeking. The disruption is working exactly as designed. The intervention is a replacement behavior with the same function. Devon raises a yellow card to signal, I need a check-in. The teacher provides brief, private attention on demand. Disruptions decrease by seventy percent within two weeks. He is getting the same thing. He is just no longer disrupting to get it.
The Boundary
De-escalation Is Not Giving In
One boundary needs stating clearly, because it is easy to blur. De-escalation is not capitulation. Temporarily reducing demands during a crisis is a tactical decision. It is made to prevent escalation, and nothing more. A return to expectations, and problem-solving, once the student is regulated. The goal is always to teach, never simply to avoid. Never negotiate during a crisis. Problem-solve when the student is calm. And the broader finding holds across this whole chapter. Function-based interventions beat punishment-only approaches. They change what a behavior earns, not only what it costs.
About Educational Psychology at UPI Study
Educational Psychology (Psychology 120) is a self-paced online course of 100 video lessons in 11 chapters, from memory, conditioning and child development to motivation, individual differences, assessment, instruction and educational technology. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Educational Psychology with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Educational Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About When Students Act Out: Understanding Difficult Behaviors
What are the four functions of behavior in the FAST model?
What is an ABC analysis in behavior management?
What makes a good replacement behavior?
Is de-escalation the same as giving in to a student?
About the Educational Psychology course
How many college credits is Educational Psychology?
How much does Educational Psychology cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Educational Psychology take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Educational Psychology.
100 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →