UPI Study › Courses › Educational Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 6.10 Free with a free account
Taking Charge: Self-Regulated Learning and Teacher Expectations
Educational Psychology · Chapter 6: Motivation, Goals, and the Drive to LearnSection 6.10 · lesson 57 of 1008 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Educational Psychology.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Educational Psychology
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: When Students Stop Trying: Learned Helplessness and Rewards →← Choice, Competence, and Connection: Self-Determination TheoryNext lesson: When Students Stop Trying: Learned Helplessness and Rewards →
In this lesson
Zimmerman's cycle, metacognition, and how an expectation becomes a result.
- Describe the three phases of Zimmerman's SRL cycle
- Distinguish metacognitive knowledge from metacognitive regulation
- Explain the four pathways of the Pygmalion effect
- Apply countermeasures to expectation effects and stereotype threat
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,042 words). Read along, or search it.
Motivation, Goals, and the Drive to Learn
Taking Charge: Self-Regulated Learning and Teacher Expectations
Some students study for four hours and remember very little. Others study for one and remember most of it. The difference is usually not intelligence. It is management. This section covers self-regulated learning. We will walk through Zimmerman's three-phase cycle. Then metacognition, which is the engine underneath it. Then we switch to the other side of the desk. Teacher expectations, and the Pygmalion effect. We will trace the four pathways by which an expectation becomes a result. And five countermeasures, one of which you can measure in a single lesson.
Definition
Active Participants in Their Own Learning
Self-regulated learning has a precise definition. It is the degree to which students are active participants. Active in their own learning process. And the definition names three ways of being active. Metacognitively. They monitor their own thinking. Motivationally. They manage their own beliefs and effort. Behaviorally. They act on what the monitoring tells them. All three matter, and the third is where many students stop. Noticing that you do not understand something is metacognition. Doing something about it is self-regulation. A student can have the first without the second. And that student looks, from outside, like they were not paying attention.
Zimmerman
Three Phases, in a Cycle
Barry Zimmerman's model of self-regulated learning has three phases. The forethought phase comes before the task. Students analyze the task, and set goals. They activate relevant strategies and motivational beliefs. Including self-efficacy, and expectations about the outcome. The performance phase happens during the task. Students implement their selected strategies. While self-monitoring, to track progress and attention. The self-reflection phase comes afterward. Students evaluate outcomes against their goals. They make causal attributions, and they react emotionally. And this is a cycle rather than a sequence. Those reactions influence the next forethought phase.
Metacognition
The Engine of Self-Regulation
Metacognition is the cognitive engine of all of this. It means thinking about your own thinking. And it has two components worth distinguishing. Metacognitive knowledge is what learners know about themselves. About their own cognitive processes, about tasks, and about strategies. Metacognitive regulation is the active part. Monitoring comprehension. Detecting errors. And deploying repair strategies when understanding breaks down. Students with strong metacognitive skills do three things. They know when they do not understand something. They select appropriate strategies for different types of task. And they allocate their study time efficiently.
Key Idea
Not Smarter. Better Managed.
Here is the key idea, and it is genuinely encouraging. Self-regulated learners outperform their peers. Not primarily because they are smarter. But because they manage their learning processes more effectively. And these skills are learnable. They are teachable, and they improve with instruction. They are not fixed cognitive abilities. Which makes self-regulated learning high leverage. Among the most high-leverage interventions available to an educator. The skill transfers across every subject a student takes. And it keeps working after your course has ended. Very little else in this chapter can claim that.
In Practice
A Weekly Learning Journal
Here is a self-regulation tool that costs almost nothing. A high school history teacher introduces weekly learning journals. Students answer three questions about each lesson. What did I understand? What remains unclear? And what strategies will I use to clarify that before next class? That third question is the one doing the heavy work. The first two activate metacognitive monitoring. The third activates adaptive strategy planning. Both are core self-regulated learning skills. Over the semester, students report greater confidence. Confidence in managing their own learning. And they show improved examination performance.
The Pygmalion Effect
Rosenthal and Jacobson, 1968
Now to the other side of the desk. Teacher expectations. The Pygmalion effect is named after a study from nineteen sixty-eight. By Robert Rosenthal and Lenore Jacobson. It describes teacher expectations influencing student outcomes. In the direction of those expectations. A self-fulfilling prophecy. The design of the original study is the important part. Teachers were told certain students were intellectual bloomers. Expected to show significant gains that year. Those students were randomly selected. And they did in fact show greater gains than the control group. Not because of any inherent difference between the groups. But because the expectation changed teacher behavior toward them.
Four Pathways
How an Expectation Becomes a Result
Teacher expectations act through four identifiable pathways. Climate. Warmth, and socio-emotional support. Input. More challenging material offered to high-expectancy students. Opportunity. More chances to respond and to contribute. Feedback. More informative and more encouraging feedback. Now consider the mirror image of that list. Students for whom teachers hold low expectations receive systematically less of all four. Less warmth. Less challenge. Fewer chances. Weaker feedback. And this is the crucial mechanism to understand. The expectation does not act on the student directly. It acts through four completely ordinary teaching behaviors.
Stereotype Threat
A Compounding Mechanism
Stereotype threat compounds all of this. It is the fear of confirming a negative stereotype about your group. And it degrades performance through a specific mechanism. It creates cognitive and emotional interference. That interference consumes working memory during the task itself. The very resource the task requires. Which produces a result that is genuinely cruel. Performance drops. And the drop appears to confirm the stereotype the student feared. The fear produces its own evidence. And that evidence then feeds back into everyone's expectations. Including the student's own.
Four Concepts
Mechanism and Implication
Four concepts, with their mechanisms and implications. Self-regulated learning runs on forethought, monitoring and reflection. So teach goal-setting, strategy use and self-monitoring explicitly. Metacognition runs on comprehension monitoring and error detection. So use think-alouds, learning journals, and self-check questions. The Pygmalion effect runs on climate, input, opportunity and feedback. So audit the equity of challenge and feedback distribution in your room. Stereotype threat runs on cognitive interference and working memory load. So use values affirmation, growth framing, and diverse representation. Notice that the first two are about teaching students a skill. And the second two are about auditing your own behavior. Both halves are required.
Countermeasures
Five Ways to Combat Expectation Effects
Five countermeasures against expectation effects. First, examine and challenge your own implicit expectations. Particularly about different student groups. Second, distribute questions and feedback equitably. Not based on who you expect to know the answer. Third, provide challenge and complexity to all students. Not only to those perceived as high-ability. Fourth, use structured cooperative learning. That reduces competitive ability comparisons in the room. Fifth, use identity-affirming and values-affirmation exercises. Those reduce stereotype threat directly. The second one is worth singling out, because it is measurable. An observer can record your question distribution in one lesson. Most teachers are genuinely surprised by their own data.
About Educational Psychology at UPI Study
Educational Psychology (Psychology 120) is a self-paced online course of 100 video lessons in 11 chapters, from memory, conditioning and child development to motivation, individual differences, assessment, instruction and educational technology. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Educational Psychology with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Educational Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Taking Charge: Self-Regulated Learning and Teacher Expectations
What are the three phases of Zimmerman's self-regulated learning model?
What is the difference between metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive regulation?
What is the Pygmalion effect in education?
How can teachers counter the effects of low expectations?
About the Educational Psychology course
How many college credits is Educational Psychology?
How much does Educational Psychology cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Educational Psychology take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Educational Psychology.
100 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →