UPI Study › Courses › Educational Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 3.4 Free with a free account
Rewards, Punishments, and Everything In Between
Educational Psychology · Chapter 3: Behavior, Conditioning, and Classroom ManagementSection 3.4 · lesson 22 of 1009 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Educational Psychology.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Educational Psychology
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: How Often Should You Reward? Finding the Right Schedule →← Fear by Design: How Watson's Little Albert Experiment Changed PsychologyNext lesson: How Often Should You Reward? Finding the Right Schedule →
In this lesson
Skinner's four quadrants, and why disruption is often reinforced.
- Define operant behavior and distinguish it from reflexive response
- Classify consequences into the four operant quadrants
- Explain why negative reinforcement increases behavior
- Apply the four-to-one positive ratio to classroom practice
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,118 words). Read along, or search it.
Behavior, Conditioning, and Classroom Management
Rewards, Punishments, and Everything In Between
A student disrupts the lesson every time the work gets hard. The usual explanation is that they are not motivated. Operant conditioning offers a better one, and it is uncomfortable. The disruption is working. This section covers Skinner's framework and its four quadrants. Positive and negative reinforcement. Positive and negative punishment. We will spend extra time on negative reinforcement. It is the one that teachers most often misunderstand. And it explains more classroom behavior than any of the others. We will finish with the ratio that research says predicts classroom climate.
Operants
Behavior That Acts on the World
B.F. Skinner extended behaviorism past classical conditioning. His focus was voluntary, goal-directed behavior. He called such behaviors operants. The word is chosen carefully. Pavlov studied reflexive responses. Things that happen to an organism. Operants operate on the environment, and produce consequences. Skinner's central insight follows from that. The consequences of a behavior determine its future probability. He developed this through meticulous laboratory work. The apparatus was the Skinner box, an enclosed chamber. Animals inside, typically rats or pigeons, pressed levers or pecked keys. They did so to receive food, or to avoid shocks.
Two By Two
The Framework in One Move
Skinner distinguished two fundamental kinds of consequence. Reinforcement increases behavior. Punishment decreases it. That is the first dimension, and it is about the behavior. The second dimension is about the stimulus. Positive means something is added. Negative means something is removed. Positive and negative here do not mean good and bad. They are arithmetic terms, and forgetting that causes most of the confusion. Cross the two dimensions and you get four categories. That two-by-two framework is among the most powerful tools a teacher has. It lets you analyze student behavior systematically. Rather than describing it, which is what most behavior policies do.
Quadrant One
Positive Reinforcement
Start with positive reinforcement. You add a desirable stimulus following a behavior. The future likelihood of that behavior increases. Praise. Stickers. Extra privileges. Earned grades. All common examples in educational settings. Research consistently shows this is the most effective long-term strategy. Particularly for skill acquisition, as opposed to compliance. And the reason is informational rather than motivational. Positive reinforcement tells students what they should do. Not merely what they should avoid. A student who only knows what to avoid still has to guess at the rest. Which is a lot to ask of someone who is already struggling.
Quadrant Two
Negative Reinforcement Is Still Reinforcement
Negative reinforcement is the quadrant that gets misread. You remove an aversive stimulus following a behavior. And the future likelihood of that behavior increases. Increases. Negative reinforcement is not punishment. It is also not the same thing as negative feedback. Getting this wrong makes a whole class of behavior impossible to analyze. Here is a clean example. A student completes their homework to avoid the teacher's disappointed reaction. The homework behavior goes up. It goes up because something unpleasant went away. Nothing pleasant was added at any point. That is negative reinforcement, working exactly as described.
Key Idea
Why Disruption Keeps Happening
Now apply that to disruptive behavior, and it reorganizes the whole problem. Much classroom disruption is negatively reinforced. Students act out to escape challenging work. To avoid social anxiety in front of peers. Or to obtain peer attention, which is a different quadrant again. The behavior works. That is exactly why it recurs. Consider a student sent out of the room for disruption during a hard task. In operant terms, that student has just been rewarded. The difficult task was removed, immediately and reliably. Whatever the intention was, that is the contingency they experienced. So the analytical question is never why would they do that. The question is what did that behavior remove.
Quadrant Three
Positive Punishment, and Its Costs
Positive punishment adds an aversive stimulus after unwanted behavior. Detention. Extra assignments. Verbal reprimands. And it does work in one specific way. It can suppress behavior quickly, which is why it is so widely used. But it carries three costs. First, it may produce emotional side effects. Fear, resentment, and avoidance, sometimes of the teacher themselves. Second, it provides no information about what to do instead. Third, its effects are often situation-specific. That third cost is the practical one. The suppressed behavior may return whenever the punisher is absent. Which means it was never reduced. It was policed.
Quadrant Four
Negative Punishment
Negative punishment removes a desirable stimulus after unwanted behavior. Time-out from a preferred activity. Loss of free time. Removal of technology privileges. It is generally considered more educationally defensible than positive punishment. But that judgment comes with a condition attached. It must be paired with clear expectations. And with opportunities for the student to learn alternative behaviors. Without that pairing, it shares the weakness of positive punishment. It says stop, and nothing else. A student who does not know what to do instead will do something else wrong. And then the consequence arrives again, and the pattern hardens.
All Four
The Quadrants Side by Side
Put all four quadrants side by side. Positive reinforcement adds a desirable stimulus and increases behavior. Praise for raising a hand. Negative reinforcement removes an aversive stimulus and increases behavior. Skipping a drill when the work is done early. Positive punishment adds an aversive stimulus and decreases behavior. Extra homework for disruption. Negative punishment removes a desirable stimulus and decreases behavior. Loss of recess for aggression. When you classify something, check the effect column first. Positive and negative describe what happened to the stimulus. Reinforcement and punishment describe what happened to the behavior. Two independent questions, and answering them in that order prevents most errors.
In Practice
Mrs. Chen's Behavior Board
Here is a balanced system in a fifth-grade classroom. Mrs. Chen uses a behavior board. Students earn stickers for completing work quietly. That is positive reinforcement, adding something desirable. Students who disrupt may lose five minutes of recess. That is negative punishment, removing something desirable. So far this is an ordinary system, and many classrooms stop there. But she does one more thing consistently. She explains what behavior she expects instead. And she gives students a chance to earn points back through constructive actions. That third step is what makes the system work. Without a route back, a consequence says only that today is already lost. And a student with nothing left to lose cannot be managed by consequences.
The Ratio
Catch Students Being Good
One principle from this research matters more than any technique. Catch students being good. Specifically, aim for four positive interactions to every corrective one. That ratio is associated with optimal classroom climate. With student motivation, and with academic engagement. It should be a conscious goal, for every teacher. Not something left to temperament or to mood. And here is why it needs to be conscious. Corrective interactions are far more memorable to the person giving them. They carry effort, and often some emotion. So a teacher's sense of their own ratio is systematically wrong. Most people who feel balanced are nowhere near four to one.
About Educational Psychology at UPI Study
Educational Psychology (Psychology 120) is a self-paced online course of 100 video lessons in 11 chapters, from memory, conditioning and child development to motivation, individual differences, assessment, instruction and educational technology. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Educational Psychology with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Educational Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Rewards, Punishments, and Everything In Between
What is operant conditioning?
What are the four quadrants of operant conditioning?
What is the difference between negative reinforcement and punishment?
What is the four-to-one ratio in classroom management?
About the Educational Psychology course
How many college credits is Educational Psychology?
How much does Educational Psychology cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Educational Psychology take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Educational Psychology.
100 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →