Fear by Design: How Watson's Little Albert Experiment Changed Psychology

UPI Study › Courses › Educational Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 3.3 Free with a free account

Fear by Design: How Watson's Little Albert Experiment Changed Psychology

Educational Psychology · Chapter 3: Behavior, Conditioning, and Classroom ManagementSection 3.3 · lesson 21 of 1009 min · free with a free account

← Pavlov Was Not Just About Dogs: Classical Conditioning in Real LifeNext lesson: Rewards, Punishments, and Everything In Between →

Earn 3 college credits for Educational PsychologyRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Psychology 120 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Educational Psychology · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

A founding study of conditioned emotion, and a founding case in research ethics.

  • Explain Watson's behaviorist program and radical environmentalism
  • Describe the Little Albert procedure and its generalization finding
  • Identify the ethical violations that modern review boards would block
  • Apply counterconditioning to a conditioned classroom fear

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,237 words). Read along, or search it.

Behavior, Conditioning, and Classroom Management

Fear by Design: How Watson's Little Albert Experiment Changed Psychology

This section covers an experiment that should not have happened. It also produced a finding that changed how we understand fear. Both of those are true, and teaching it means holding both. We will start with John Watson and the founding of behaviorism. Then the Little Albert experiment itself, step by step. We will look at how the fear generalized, which is the durable finding. Then at the ethics, and at exactly which principles were violated. And we will end with counterconditioning, which is the repair. Including one classroom case where it worked in six weeks. The scientific and the ethical parts of this story do not cancel out.

Watson

A Manifesto for Observable Behavior

John Watson founded behaviorism as an explicit scientific program. His nineteen thirteen paper was titled Psychology as the Behaviorist Views It. In it he argued that psychology should abandon the study of consciousness. It should focus exclusively on observable behavior. For Watson, all human behavior was the product of conditioning. Including complex emotional responses. This is called radical environmentalism, and he stated it in its strongest form. Given the right conditioning history, he claimed, a person could be shaped into virtually any type of individual. He made that claim famous in what became known as the dozen healthy infants quote. It is the boldest version of the nurture position anyone has actually defended.

The Consequence

Psychology Joins the Natural Sciences

Watson's position was a dramatic departure from the psychology of his day. That psychology was introspective. It asked people what they experienced. By insisting on objective measurement and observable events, Watson aligned psychology more closely with the natural sciences. That move had consequences well beyond the laboratory. It laid groundwork for subsequent behavioral research. And for practical applications in education, in advertising, and in therapy. Much of twentieth-century classroom management traces back to this turn. But there is a second legacy, and it is not a scientific one. His methods raised enduring ethical questions. Questions about the limits of psychological experimentation. The Little Albert study is the reason those questions are still asked.

Little Albert

The 1920 Experiment

In nineteen twenty, Watson and his graduate student ran the study. Her name was Rosalie Rayner, and it took place at Johns Hopkins University. The participant was an infant of about nine months. He is referred to in the literature as Albert B. The procedure had three phases. First, a baseline. Watson confirmed Albert showed no fear of a white rat. No fear of a rabbit, a dog, or other neutral stimuli either. Second, the pairing. Watson struck a steel bar with a hammer, producing a loud noise. He did this at the moment Albert reached for the rat. The noise was the unconditioned stimulus, and fear was the natural response. Third, the result. After repeated pairings, Albert cried at the sight of the rat. A conditioned emotional response, deliberately created.

Generalization

The Fear Did Not Stay With the Rat

The experiment demonstrated something beyond the original pairing. It demonstrated generalization. Albert's conditioned fear spread to other white, furry objects. A rabbit. A dog. A fur coat. And, notoriously, a Santa Claus mask. None of those had ever been paired with the loud noise. This is why the finding has endured for a century. It suggested that conditioned emotional responses can generalize broadly. Which helps explain how phobias develop in the first place. And why they persist long after the original cause is forgotten. The person with the phobia is not being irrational. They are showing generalization from a pairing they may not even remember.

Key Idea

Fear Can Be Manufactured, and It Spreads

Here is the key idea, stated plainly. Emotional responses such as fear can be deliberately conditioned. And once conditioned, they generalize to similar stimuli. Those two facts together have profound implications. For understanding phobias, and anxiety disorders. And for understanding the emotional impact of early learning experiences. There is also a fact about the study itself that must be stated. It was never properly concluded. Albert was removed before Watson could attempt counterconditioning. The fear that was created was never undone. That leaves an unresolved question about the welfare of the participant. It is not a footnote. It is part of what the study is.

Ethics

Why This Would Never Be Approved Today

By modern standards this experiment would never be approved. An Institutional Review Board would reject it immediately. Three violations stand out, and they are worth naming precisely. First, consent. There was no proper informed consent from the child's guardian. His mother was an employee of the hospital. She may well have felt pressured to comply. Second, harm. The study deliberately induced distress in a vulnerable participant. Third, abandonment. There was no attempt at deconditioning before the study was terminated. Watson acknowledged that he intended to remove the fear. He said he never had the opportunity. That is the whole defense available.

The Legacy

Double-Edged, and Both Edges Are Sharp

The legacy of this study is genuinely double-edged. Scientifically, it produced something that had never existed. The first controlled demonstration of a conditioned emotional response in a human. And it opened the door to behavioral treatments for anxiety. Treatments that have since helped an enormous number of people. Ethically, it became a landmark case study in research misconduct. It prompted the development of stricter protections for research participants. And it contributed to the eventual establishment of review board oversight. So the safeguards we have partly exist because of this study. Modern educators have to hold both halves at once. The knowledge is real, and so is the cost of how it was obtained. That tension does not resolve, and pretending it does is worse.

The Phases

How the Fear Was Built

Trace the phases and you can see the fear being assembled. Pre-conditioning. The rat is presented alone. No fear response is observed. Albert is curious. Trial one. The rat and the loud noise are presented together. A startle and distress response follows immediately. Trials two through seven. The pairing is repeated. Fear at the sight of the rat increases with each trial. Post-conditioning. The rat is presented alone, now as a conditioned stimulus. The conditioned fear response is established. Then the generalization test. A rabbit, a fur coat, a Santa mask. Fear appears for all of them. Five phases, and a lasting fear built in the space of an afternoon.

Counterconditioning

Mary Cover Jones and the Case of Peter

Watson never applied it to Albert. But there is a repair for this. It is called counterconditioning. The conditioned stimulus that elicits fear is paired with something positive. Or at least something neutral, gradually and repeatedly. Until the conditioned response is replaced rather than merely suppressed. Mary Cover Jones was one of Watson's own students. In nineteen twenty-four she demonstrated the technique with a boy called Peter. Peter was afraid of rabbits. His fear was progressively eliminated by pairing the rabbit with eating. A pleasurable activity, presented alongside the feared thing. Jones's work is considered the precursor to systematic desensitization. That technique is still in use in cognitive-behavioral therapy today.

In Practice

Six Weeks to Reading Aloud

Here is counterconditioning in an ordinary classroom. A third-grader is terrified of reading aloud. The fear started when classmates laughed at her. Her teacher does not require her to read aloud and get over it. He starts whisper reading. Students read quietly to a partner. Warm setting, low pressure, no audience. The reading context gets paired with positive peer interactions. And with personal success, repeatedly, over weeks. After six weeks, the student volunteers to read aloud for the first time. And this is why emotional safety is not merely a matter of kindness. Humiliation, failure without support, harsh criticism. Those condition lasting aversions to learning itself. The obligation to prevent that is grounded in behavioral science.

About Educational Psychology at UPI Study

Educational Psychology (Psychology 120) is a self-paced online course of 100 video lessons in 11 chapters, from memory, conditioning and child development to motivation, individual differences, assessment, instruction and educational technology. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →

Why take it here

Why students take Educational Psychology with UPI Study

How people learn, and how to teach themEducational Psychology explains how students learn, develop and stay motivated, and how teachers assess and support them. It is a standard course in education and teaching degrees and a common psychology elective.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Educational Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Fear by Design: How Watson's Little Albert Experiment Changed Psychology

What was the Little Albert experiment?
The Little Albert experiment was a 1920 study by John Watson and his graduate student Rosalie Rayner at Johns Hopkins University. They paired a white rat with a loud noise made by striking a steel bar while an infant of about nine months reached for the rat. After repeated pairings, Albert cried at the rat alone, and his fear generalized to a rabbit, a dog, a fur coat and a Santa Claus mask.
What is Watson's radical environmentalism?
Radical environmentalism is John Watson's view that all human behavior, including complex emotional responses, is the product of conditioning. In his 1913 paper Psychology as the Behaviorist Views It, he argued that psychology should abandon the study of consciousness and focus on observable behavior. He famously claimed, in his dozen healthy infants quote, that the right conditioning could shape a person into virtually any type of individual.
Why was the Little Albert experiment unethical?
The Little Albert experiment would not be approved by a modern Institutional Review Board for three main reasons. There was no proper informed consent from Albert's mother, a hospital employee who may have felt pressured. The study deliberately caused distress in a vulnerable infant. And Albert was removed without any attempt to remove the fear. The case helped prompt stronger protections for research participants.
What is counterconditioning?
Counterconditioning replaces a conditioned fear by repeatedly and gradually pairing the feared stimulus with something positive or neutral. In 1924, Mary Cover Jones, one of Watson's students, used it to eliminate a boy named Peter's fear of rabbits by pairing the rabbit with eating. Her work is considered a precursor to systematic desensitization, which is still used in cognitive-behavioral therapy.

About the Educational Psychology course

How many college credits is Educational Psychology?
Educational Psychology (Psychology 120) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Educational Psychology cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 100 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Educational Psychology take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 100 lessons total about 15 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Educational Psychology.

100 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Educational Psychology →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Educational Psychology
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →