UPI Study › Courses › Educational Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 9.1 Free with a free account
Get Up, Get Involved: Active and Collaborative Learning
Educational Psychology · Chapter 9: Instructional Strategies and Effective Teaching PracticeSection 9.1 · lesson 83 of 1008 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Educational Psychology.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Educational Psychology
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Taught or Discovered? Two Approaches to Instruction →← Assessing Students with Special NeedsNext lesson: Taught or Discovered? Two Approaches to Instruction →
In this lesson
Active and collaborative learning, and why moving the cognitive work matters.
- Define active learning and its foundational principle
- Describe Think-Pair-Share, Jigsaw, and problem-based learning
- Explain how collaboration deepens understanding
- Match an active strategy to a teaching purpose
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,094 words). Read along, or search it.
Instructional Strategies and Effective Teaching Practice
Get Up, Get Involved
In most classrooms, the person doing the hardest thinking is the teacher. She has prepared, organized, and worked out how to explain it. The students, meanwhile, are receiving a finished product. Active learning is about moving that cognitive work across the room. This section covers what that looks like in practice. We start with Think-Pair-Share, which works at every level. Then the Jigsaw method, which builds real interdependence. Then problem-based and project-based learning. Then collaboration, and the theory behind why it works. And finally three cognitive mechanisms that explain the whole thing. None of these strategies work because students enjoy them more.
Definition
Who Is Doing the Cognitive Work?
Active learning requires students to engage meaningfully with material. Rather than passively receiving information. That is the definition, but the mechanism is the interesting part. Unlike traditional lecture-based models, it relocates the work. It places the cognitive work squarely on the student. Learners are expected to think critically and solve problems. To discuss ideas, and to construct their own understanding. Rather than simply absorbing a teacher's explanation. The foundational principle behind all of this is straightforward. Engagement and effortful processing lead to deeper encoding. Deeper encoding in long-term memory, which is what retention means.
The Evidence
Three Consistent Findings
The research on this is consistent, and it is broad. Active learning environments produce better academic outcomes. And that finding holds across disciplines, not just in a few subjects. Students in active classrooms show three specific advantages. Higher rates of retention. Stronger transfer of knowledge to new contexts. And greater intrinsic motivation. That second one, transfer, is the hardest thing to teach for. So teachers who design active lessons are not following a trend. They are applying decades of cognitive science research. Research on how the human brain actually learns.
Think-Pair-Share
The Most Portable Structure There Is
Think-Pair-Share is one of the most widely used active structures. And it takes about three minutes to run. The teacher poses a question. Students think independently for a brief period. Then they discuss with a partner. And finally they share their insights with the class. It works through two separate mechanisms, which is worth noticing. First, it reduces cognitive load. Students get time to process before they have to speak. Second, it lowers the social risk of contributing. You have already said it once, quietly, to one person. It is equally effective in elementary rooms and university lecture halls.
Jigsaw
Every Student Holds Something the Others Need
The Jigsaw method is more elaborate, and more powerful. Each student is assigned to a home group. Then they are reassigned to expert groups. In the expert group, they master one specific segment of content. Then they return to their home groups and teach what they learned. That structure creates genuine interdependence. Every student possesses unique information their peers need. Nobody can quietly opt out without the group losing content. And the teaching role itself does something valuable. Articulating knowledge to others reveals gaps in it. You find out what you did not understand while explaining it. Which strengthens the understanding, rather than just testing it.
PBL And PrBL
Two Approaches That Mirror Real Work
Two related approaches organize whole units rather than moments. Problem-Based Learning situates students in realistic scenarios. Deliberately ill-structured scenarios, without a clean given answer. Students identify the problem, gather information, and propose solutions. Project-Based Learning extends that one step further. It requires a tangible, public product at the end. A presentation, a prototype, or a report. So the difference between them is the deliverable. One ends in a defensible solution. The other ends in something a stranger can look at. Both mirror real-world professional work closely. And both are particularly effective in STEM and vocational programs.
Collaboration
Extending Participation Into the Social Domain
Collaborative learning extends active participation into the social domain. When students work together toward a shared goal, three things happen. They are exposed to multiple perspectives. They are required to articulate and defend their own reasoning. And they are challenged to reconcile conflicting ideas. That third one is where most of the learning actually happens. This social negotiation of meaning has a theoretical home. It aligns with Vygotsky's sociocultural theory. That theory holds that learning is fundamentally a social process. A process mediated by language, and by interaction. So collaboration is not a delivery method laid over learning. On this account, it is closer to what learning is.
Beyond Grades
The Skills Employers Keep Naming
Beyond academic gains, collaboration builds something else. Soft skills that employers consistently rank as top priorities. Communication. Teamwork. Leadership, and adaptability. There is one more benefit that is less obvious. Students who work in groups regularly develop greater self-regulation. And the reason is peer accountability structures. Those structures support and motivate individual effort. Letting down a group feels different from letting down yourself. The cumulative effect is a more robust education. And a more transferable one than passive reception alone produces.
Why It Works
Three Evidence-Backed Mechanisms
So why does any of this work? Three mechanisms explain it. Retrieval practice, elaboration, and interleaving. Those are among the most evidence-backed learning strategies. And active learning incorporates all three naturally. Students retrieve when they answer questions. Pulling information out of memory strengthens the memory. They elaborate when they explain something to a peer. Connecting new knowledge to knowledge they already have. And they interleave topics when working on complex projects. This is the honest reason these strategies outperform lecture. Not because students enjoy them more, though they often do. Because they force the operations that build durable memory.
Compared
Five Strategies, and Where Each Fits
Five strategies, with the job each one is suited to. Think-Pair-Share is individual reflection, then paired discussion, then sharing. Use it for concept checks and warm-ups, with any group size. Jigsaw has expert groups teaching home groups. Use it for complex multi-part content, in groups of four to six. Problem-Based Learning lets an unstructured problem drive the research. Use it for applied professional skills, in groups of three to five. Project-Based Learning runs a long-term project toward a product. Use it for synthesis and creation, in groups of two to six. And peer teaching has students teach each other segments. Use it for review and reinforcement, in pairs or small groups. Notice that group size is a design decision, not an accident.
Classroom Example
Sixty Seconds Before the Explanation
One example shows how small the change can be. A high school science teacher is introducing photosynthesis. She opens with a question rather than an explanation. Why do plants need sunlight? Students reflect for sixty seconds on their own. Then they discuss with a partner, and then share. She charts the responses on the board as they come. And that charting reveals misconceptions. Misconceptions revealed before she presents the formal explanation. Participation increases dramatically compared to direct lecture. But she gained something else, which matters just as much. She now knows what her explanation has to overcome.
About Educational Psychology at UPI Study
Educational Psychology (Psychology 120) is a self-paced online course of 100 video lessons in 11 chapters, from memory, conditioning and child development to motivation, individual differences, assessment, instruction and educational technology. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Educational Psychology with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Educational Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Get Up, Get Involved: Active and Collaborative Learning
What is active learning?
How does Think-Pair-Share work?
What is the Jigsaw method in teaching?
What is the difference between problem-based and project-based learning?
About the Educational Psychology course
How many college credits is Educational Psychology?
How much does Educational Psychology cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Educational Psychology take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Educational Psychology.
100 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →