Fluid, Crystallized, and Multiple Intelligences: The Full Picture

UPI Study › Courses › Educational Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 7.2 Free with a free account

Fluid, Crystallized, and Multiple Intelligences: The Full Picture

Educational Psychology · Chapter 7: Individual Differences, Intelligence, and Inclusive LearningSection 7.2 · lesson 60 of 1009 min · free with a free account

← How Do We Measure How Smart Someone Is? Intelligence MethodsNext lesson: How Parenting, Culture, and Socialization Shape the Way We Learn →

Earn 3 college credits for Educational PsychologyRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Psychology 120 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Educational Psychology · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

Four frameworks that widen intelligence past a single measurable capacity.

  • Distinguish fluid from crystallized intelligence
  • Explain Gardner's eight multiple intelligences
  • Describe Sternberg's triarchic theory and its uses
  • Evaluate the criticisms leveled at these frameworks

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,198 words). Read along, or search it.

Individual Differences, Intelligence, and Inclusive Learning

Fluid, Crystallized, and Multiple Intelligences

The last section left us with a single number, and a long list of complaints about it. This section is about the alternatives that were built in response. Four frameworks, all arguing that one measurable capacity is too narrow. We start with Cattell and Horn, and the split between fluid and crystallized intelligence. That distinction turns out to matter a great deal for lesson design. Then Howard Gardner's eight multiple intelligences. Then Robert Sternberg's triarchic theory, with its three components. And finally the criticism, which is real and which we will not dodge. Empirical support for some of this is thinner than its popularity suggests. The useful question is not whether these theories are perfectly proven. It is what each one lets a teacher notice that a single score would hide.

Fluid Intelligence

Reasoning With Material You Have Never Seen

Raymond Cattell and John Horn proposed a foundational distinction. They split broad intelligence into two different kinds. The first is fluid intelligence. It is the capacity to solve novel problems, and to reason abstractly. It is thinking flexibly in situations that do not depend on prior knowledge. That last clause is the whole definition, really. Fluid intelligence is what you use when experience cannot help you. Pattern recognition draws heavily on it. So does logical deduction with unfamiliar material, and working memory. It is considered relatively independent of cultural learning. And it is thought to peak in young adulthood, before gradually declining with age.

Crystallized Intelligence

Everything You Have Already Banked

Crystallized intelligence is the other half of the pair. It encompasses the accumulation of knowledge, vocabulary, and skills. All of it acquired through education and experience. So this is everything you have already banked. It is measured by vocabulary tests, and by general knowledge assessments. Reading comprehension is another common measure. And here is the striking part of the comparison. Crystallized intelligence tends to remain stable throughout adulthood. It may even increase, as individuals continue to learn and develop expertise. So the two abilities do not decline together. One is quietly falling while the other is still being built.

Side By Side

Two Abilities, Two Life Courses

Placing the two side by side makes the contrast sharp. Fluid intelligence does not depend on prior knowledge, by definition. Crystallized intelligence essentially is the prior knowledge. Across the lifespan, fluid ability peaks in young adulthood and then declines. Crystallized ability stays stable, or keeps rising, through adulthood. They are measured by different tasks, which follows from all of that. Pattern recognition, deduction and working memory tap the fluid side. Vocabulary, general knowledge and comprehension tap the crystallized side. The educational implication is genuinely practical. Younger students lean on fluid reasoning when tackling new concepts. Adult learners draw heavily on prior crystallized knowledge instead. So the same lesson does not land the same way on both.

Gardner 1983

One Capacity Was Too Narrow a Story

Howard Gardner introduced his theory of multiple intelligences in nineteen eighty-three. His argument started from a complaint about the traditional conception. Intelligence as a single, measurable capacity was simply too narrow. Gardner proposed that humans possess at least eight distinct types. Each one represents a different way of processing information. The critical claim is that they are relatively independent of one another. So a person can be highly capable in one domain. And show average or below-average performance in another. That is not a contradiction under this framework. It is the expected pattern. Gardner grounded the theory in neuropsychological evidence and cognitive research. He also drew on observation of exceptional individuals across cultures.

The First Four

Language, Logic, Music, Space

Consider the first four of Gardner's eight intelligences. Linguistic intelligence covers language and storytelling. You engage it with journaling, debates and oral presentations. Logical-mathematical intelligence covers reasoning and computation. Puzzles, experiments and coding projects reach it directly. Musical intelligence is rhythm and melody recognition. Songs, musical mnemonics and rhythm activities put it to work. Spatial intelligence covers visualization and navigation. Diagrams, maps and artistic projects engage it. Notice that the first two are exactly what most schools already assess. That observation is doing most of the theoretical work here.

The Second Four

Body, Others, Self, Nature

The second four are further from a traditional report card. Bodily-kinesthetic intelligence is physical coordination and skill. Role play, labs and physical demonstrations engage it. Interpersonal intelligence is understanding other people. Group projects, peer tutoring and discussion draw on it. Intrapersonal intelligence is self-reflection and self-awareness. Journals, personal goal-setting and reflection are the natural vehicles. And naturalist intelligence is pattern recognition in the natural world. Field trips, classification activities and science engage it. Teachers using this framework let students show understanding many ways. Through art, music, movement, discussion and nature-based inquiry. Crucially, that is in addition to reading and mathematical exercises.

Sternberg

Three Interrelated Components

Robert Sternberg took a different route to the same complaint. His triarchic theory identifies three interrelated components. Analytical intelligence, creative intelligence, and practical intelligence. Notice the word interrelated in that description. Sternberg is not proposing three separate people in one head. He is describing three faces of one working intelligence. Three, rather than Gardner's eight, is also a deliberate difference. The claim is narrower, and correspondingly easier to act on. A teacher can genuinely design for three modes of thinking. Designing eight parallel routes through every unit is another matter. So keep the three in view as we look at what each one means.

The Three

Analyze, Invent, or Get It Done

Analytical intelligence comes first, and it will look familiar. It corresponds most closely to what traditional IQ tests measure. The capacity to analyze, to evaluate, and to compare information. Creative intelligence is the ability to generate novel ideas. Making unexpected connections, and thinking divergently. Practical intelligence is sometimes called street smarts. It is the ability to adapt to and shape real-world environments effectively. Sternberg's complaint about schooling follows directly from this. Overemphasis on analytical intelligence disadvantages a whole set of students. Specifically, those whose strengths lie in creativity or practical problem-solving. His model has led to curricular innovations in response. Creative and project-based learning, applying knowledge to authentic challenges.

Classroom Example

One Unit, Three Parallel Tracks

Here is what the triarchic model looks like inside one unit. A science teacher is teaching ecosystems. She builds three parallel assessment tracks rather than one test. The analytical track is an essay comparing two ecosystem types. The creative track asks students to design an imaginary ecosystem. With supporting evidence, so it is invention under constraint. The practical track is a community action plan. It addresses a real local environmental issue. Now look carefully at what has not changed here. Each track targets exactly the same content objectives. What differs is the cognitive strength each route honors. That is differentiated assessment, and not a lowered standard.

The Criticism

Thin Evidence, Durable Usefulness

Now the criticism, because this material is often taught without it. Empirical support for the distinctness of Gardner's eight intelligences remains limited. That is a real weakness, and it deserves to be stated plainly. Popularity in schools is not the same thing as evidence. So why has the framework survived, and why is it still taught? Because it has proven valuable as a conceptual tool. It helps teachers recognize and nurture diverse learner strengths. It has been widely adopted as a rationale for diversifying instruction. And all three frameworks converge on one point that does hold up. Intelligence cannot be reduced to a single score. Students who struggle on standardized assessments may still possess extraordinary capabilities. Creative, interpersonal or practical strengths that no ranking will surface.

About Educational Psychology at UPI Study

Educational Psychology (Psychology 120) is a self-paced online course of 100 video lessons in 11 chapters, from memory, conditioning and child development to motivation, individual differences, assessment, instruction and educational technology. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →

Why take it here

Why students take Educational Psychology with UPI Study

How people learn, and how to teach themEducational Psychology explains how students learn, develop and stay motivated, and how teachers assess and support them. It is a standard course in education and teaching degrees and a common psychology elective.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Educational Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Fluid, Crystallized, and Multiple Intelligences: The Full Picture

What is the difference between fluid and crystallized intelligence?
In Raymond Cattell and John Horn's model, fluid intelligence is the ability to solve novel problems and reason abstractly without relying on prior knowledge, while crystallized intelligence is accumulated knowledge, vocabulary and skills gained through education and experience. Fluid ability is thought to peak in young adulthood and then gradually decline, while crystallized ability tends to stay stable or even increase through adulthood.
What are Gardner's eight multiple intelligences?
Howard Gardner's eight intelligences are linguistic, logical-mathematical, musical, spatial, bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal, intrapersonal and naturalist. He argued these are relatively independent, so a person can be highly capable in one and average in another. Teachers using the framework let students show understanding through art, music, movement, discussion and nature-based inquiry, in addition to reading and math.
What is Sternberg's triarchic theory of intelligence?
Robert Sternberg's triarchic theory describes three interrelated components: analytical intelligence, which analyzes, evaluates and compares information; creative intelligence, which generates novel ideas and makes unexpected connections; and practical intelligence, or "street smarts," the ability to adapt to and shape real-world environments. Sternberg argued that schools overemphasize analytical intelligence, disadvantaging students whose strengths are creative or practical.
Is there scientific evidence for multiple intelligences?
Empirical support for Gardner's eight intelligences being truly distinct remains limited, and popularity in schools is not the same as evidence. The framework has survived mainly as a conceptual tool that helps teachers recognize diverse strengths and justify varied instruction. Gardner, Sternberg, and Cattell and Horn do converge on one well-supported point: intelligence cannot be reduced to a single score.

About the Educational Psychology course

How many college credits is Educational Psychology?
Educational Psychology (Psychology 120) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Educational Psychology cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 100 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Educational Psychology take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 100 lessons total about 15 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Educational Psychology.

100 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Educational Psychology →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Educational Psychology
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →