UPI Study › Courses › Educational Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 4.2 Free with a free account
How Kids Think: Piaget's Map of the Mind
Educational Psychology · Chapter 4: Cognitive and Social Development in ChildrenSection 4.2 · lesson 29 of 1009 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Educational Psychology.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Educational Psychology
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Learning by Adjusting: Assimilation and Accommodation →← Growing Up: What Changes and What Shapes UsNext lesson: Learning by Adjusting: Assimilation and Accommodation →
In this lesson
Schemas, assimilation and accommodation, and the engine of equilibration.
- Explain Piaget's constructivist view of the child
- Define schemas and describe how they differentiate
- Contrast assimilation with accommodation
- Use productive cognitive conflict to drive equilibration
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,179 words). Read along, or search it.
Cognitive and Social Development in Children
How Kids Think: Piaget's Map of the Mind
Explain something clearly to a six-year-old and it may not land at all. Explain the same thing, the same way, a year later and it lands immediately. Piaget's theory is an account of why that happens. We will start with what he thought a child is. Then schemas, which are the building blocks of the theory. Then assimilation and accommodation, which are how schemas change. Then equilibration, which is what drives the whole process. And we will finish with a warning about rescuing confused students. Because in this framework, confusion is where the learning is happening.
Constructivism
The Child as an Active Builder
Jean Piaget was a Swiss psychologist. His work spanned most of the twentieth century. And it produced one of the most influential theories in developmental psychology. Behaviorists viewed the child as a passive recipient of environmental input. Things happen to the child, and the child is shaped. Piaget saw children as active constructors of knowledge. Little scientists, in the standard phrase. They explore the world, form hypotheses, test them. And they revise their understanding through direct interaction with things. This constructivist view puts the child at the center of learning. It has shaped progressive educational movements worldwide.
Method
How Piaget Actually Studied Children
Piaget's research methods were unconventional for his era. He conducted detailed clinical interviews with children. And careful observations, including of his own children. He asked children to explain their reasoning. On tasks he had designed to reveal underlying cognitive structures. The method has been criticized, and the criticisms are fair. Small samples. And interpretive subjectivity in reading the results. The theory survived both, which is worth noticing. Rich insight into qualitative differences between age groups. Differences in how children understand the world, not how much they know. A standardized test would have averaged those differences away.
The Central Claim
Reorganization, Not Accumulation
Piaget's central claim is stated in a single sentence. Cognitive development is not merely the accumulation of facts. It is the progressive reorganization of mental structures. Those two possibilities have very different teaching consequences. If development were accumulation, more information would always help. But if it is reorganization, something else follows. Some information cannot be absorbed until a structure exists to hold it. The information is not too hard. There is nowhere for it to go. Which explains an experience every teacher has had. A perfectly clear explanation fails completely. And the same explanation succeeds a year later, unchanged.
Schemas
The Building Blocks of Thought
A schema is a mental framework, or cognitive structure. It organizes and interprets incoming information. At one end, simple sensorimotor patterns. An infant has a sucking schema. At the other end, complex abstract frameworks. Adults use them to understand political systems, or mathematical proofs. The crucial point is that everything arrives through one. Every new experience is processed through existing schemas. When an experience fits neatly into one, it is assimilated. When it does not fit, and the schema must change, accommodation occurs. Those two words carry most of the theory.
Differentiation
Schemas Get Sharper Over Time
Schemas are not static structures. They are continuously refined. Early childhood schemas tend to be concrete and action-based. An infant has a grasping schema. It applies to all graspable objects, without distinction. Over time, schemas become more differentiated and more abstract. Consider a child with a single animal schema. It applies to all four-legged creatures equally. Separate, more precise schemas emerge for dogs, cats, cows and horses. This progressive differentiation is a hallmark of cognitive growth. And it does not stop in childhood. Expertise in any domain looks like the same process, running again.
Key Idea
Nobody Arrives Empty
Here is the key idea for anyone standing in front of a class. Children are not empty vessels to be filled with knowledge. They are active constructors of meaning. Every child arrives at school with existing schemas. Schemas built from their own experience, before you met them. So effective teaching works with those structures, not around them. A lesson that ignores what a student already believes is competing with it. Whether or not the teacher notices the competition. Which reframes what a diagnostic question is for. Finding out what students already think is not a warm-up activity. It is a prerequisite for the lesson to have anywhere to land.
Equilibration
The Engine of Development
Equilibration is the engine of the whole theory. It is Piaget's term for a self-regulatory process. One that drives cognitive development forward. It runs between two states. Equilibrium is when existing schemas are sufficient for experience. A comfortable cognitive balance. Everything makes sense. Disequilibrium arrives when a new experience cannot be accommodated. That is a state of cognitive discomfort, or puzzlement. It motivates the child to modify schemas, or to create new ones. Resolving it through accommodation restores equilibrium. But at a higher level of cognitive organization than before.
Productive Conflict
Engineering Disequilibrium on Purpose
Piaget believed equilibration drives children through his four stages. A teacher can deliberately create disequilibrium. It is sometimes called productive cognitive conflict. Present information or problems that do not fit existing schemas. The mismatch itself motivates deeper thinking. This principle underlies two familiar approaches. Inquiry-based learning, and problem-based learning. In both, students encounter challenging questions before receiving answers. That sequence is not a stylistic preference. The order is the method. Answer first, and there is no disequilibrium left to resolve.
The Vocabulary
Six Terms, Precisely Used
Six terms, and precision matters with all of them. A schema is a mental framework that organizes information. A dog schema might include four legs, fur, and barking. Assimilation is fitting new information into an existing schema. Calling a cat a dog, because it has four legs and fur. Accommodation is modifying a schema to fit new information. Creating a separate cat schema after learning that cats meow. Equilibrium is when schemas fit experience. The child identifies most common animals correctly. Disequilibrium is when experience does not fit. The child meets a whale and is confused about its category. And equilibration is the drive to restore balance through adaptation. The child restructures animal categories to include mammals.
In Practice
The Whale That Broke the Fish Schema
Watch that whale example run in a real second-grade classroom. The teacher reads students a book about whales. Students categorize whales as big fish. That is their existing schema. Then she reveals three facts. Whales breathe air. They nurse their young with milk. They are warm-blooded. Now disequilibrium arrives, and the students feel it directly. The whale does not fit the fish schema, and they know it. They discuss the puzzle with genuine interest, which is the tell. Through guided questioning, they construct a new schema for mammals. That schema accommodates the surprising information. The teacher supplied the conflict, and the questions. The reorganization happened inside the students.
One Warning
Do Not Rescue Too Soon
One warning to take out of this section. Piaget's theory suggests that confusion is not a sign of failure. A puzzled student is in disequilibrium. Which is exactly the state that drives cognitive growth. Teachers who rescue students from confusion too quickly may deprive them of the productive cognitive work. The work that leads to deep understanding rather than a remembered answer. That said, not all confusion is productive. So how do you tell the difference in the moment? Productive confusion has a shape. The student can say what does not fit. Bewilderment cannot say that, and bewilderment is when to step in.
About Educational Psychology at UPI Study
Educational Psychology (Psychology 120) is a self-paced online course of 100 video lessons in 11 chapters, from memory, conditioning and child development to motivation, individual differences, assessment, instruction and educational technology. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Educational Psychology with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Educational Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About How Kids Think: Piaget's Map of the Mind
What did Piaget mean by calling children active constructors of knowledge?
What is a schema in Piaget's theory?
What is equilibration in Piaget's theory?
Is confusion bad for learning according to Piaget?
About the Educational Psychology course
How many college credits is Educational Psychology?
How much does Educational Psychology cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Educational Psychology take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Educational Psychology.
100 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →