How Do We Measure How Smart Someone Is? Intelligence Methods

UPI Study › Courses › Educational Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 7.1 Free with a free account

How Do We Measure How Smart Someone Is? Intelligence Methods

Educational Psychology · Chapter 7: Individual Differences, Intelligence, and Inclusive LearningSection 7.1 · lesson 59 of 10010 min · free with a free account

← When Students Stop Trying: Learned Helplessness and RewardsNext lesson: Fluid, Crystallized, and Multiple Intelligences: The Full Picture →

Earn 3 college credits for Educational PsychologyRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Psychology 120 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Educational Psychology · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

From Binet's first scale to the WISC-V, and what a single number cannot carry.

  • Trace intelligence testing from Binet through Wechsler
  • Explain mental age and the intelligence quotient
  • Read a score against the normal distribution
  • Evaluate cultural bias and construct validity concerns

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,370 words). Read along, or search it.

Individual Differences, Intelligence, and Inclusive Learning

How Do We Measure How Smart Someone Is?

A number can travel a great deal further than the evidence behind it. An IQ score is the clearest example of that anywhere in education. It gets written onto a file, and then it follows a child for years. So it is worth knowing exactly where that number came from. This section traces intelligence testing from its very beginning. Binet working in France, then Terman at Stanford, and then Wechsler. We will look at what mental age meant, and how it became a quotient. Then at what the modern Wechsler scales actually report to a school team. We will read a single score against the normal distribution. And we will take the criticisms of these tests seriously. Cultural bias, construct validity, and the strange fact of the Flynn effect.

Binet's Commission

A Test Built to Find Children Who Needed Help

The formal measurement of intelligence began in the early twentieth century. Alfred Binet was a French psychologist, and the French government gave him a job. The job was to identify students who might need additional educational support. Notice how narrow that brief actually is. It is a screening task, aimed at finding children who need more help. It is not a ranking task, and it never was. Working with Theodore Simon, Binet built the first practical intelligence scale. That scale appeared in nineteen oh five. It assessed a range of cognitive tasks, including memory and attention. It also assessed problem-solving, which was unusual for the period. Binet did not design any of it to rank human worth. Holding on to that original purpose is what lets educators use results ethically.

Mental Age

Terman, Stanford, and the Quotient

Binet's scale introduced a concept that still shapes testing, called mental age. It compared one child's performance against a typical performance. Specifically, the typical performance of children at various chronological ages. So a seven-year-old might be described as performing like a nine-year-old. Lewis Terman of Stanford University took that idea considerably further. He adapted and extended Binet's work for American children. The result was the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, published in nineteen sixteen. Terman also introduced the thing everybody now argues about, the intelligence quotient. You divide mental age by chronological age, and then multiply by one hundred. A score of one hundred therefore meant average performance for that age group. That single move made individuals comparable across completely different age groups. It became the foundational scoring model for decades, and the scale is still revised today.

Wechsler

A Profile Instead of a Single Score

David Wechsler expanded on Binet's work, but in a different direction. He built tests that assessed verbal and performance abilities separately. The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale came first, published in nineteen thirty-nine. The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children followed in nineteen forty-nine. Both became the most widely used intelligence assessments in clinical settings. They became equally standard in educational settings. Here is the difference that actually mattered for teachers. Unlike the Stanford-Binet, the Wechsler scales reported subscores. Those subscores covered multiple distinct cognitive domains. So the output stopped being a verdict and became a profile. A profile of individual strengths and weaknesses is something you can teach against.

The Long Arc

One Century, Four Turning Points

It helps to see the whole century laid out at once. Four turning points, each one widening what the instrument could say. First, the Binet-Simon scale of nineteen oh five. A practical scale of memory, attention and problem-solving, introducing mental age. Second, the Stanford-Binet of nineteen sixteen. Terman adapted it for American children and added quotient scoring. Average performance was fixed at one hundred, which is where that number comes from. Third, the Wechsler scales, for adults and then for children. These separated verbal ability from performance ability. Fourth, the current WISC five, reporting five index scores from ten primary subtests. The direction of travel across all four is consistent, and worth noticing. Each revision reports less about rank, and more about how a particular mind works.

Five Indices

What the WISC-V Actually Reports

The WISC matters to educators for one very practical reason. It gives detailed information about a child's cognitive processing. The most recent edition is the WISC five, and it includes five separate indices. Verbal comprehension, and visual-spatial reasoning. Fluid reasoning, working memory, and processing speed. School psychologists commonly use it with children referred for evaluation. That includes special education referrals, and gifted identification. The results inform instructional planning inside the classroom. They also support eligibility determinations under federal special education law. So these five indices are not academic curiosities. They help decide what services a child is legally entitled to receive.

The Instruments

Five Tests Educators Actually Meet

There is no single intelligence test, and that fact is itself informative. Consider five instruments an educator is genuinely likely to encounter. The Stanford-Binet five, from two thousand three, covers ages two through eighty-five and up. It reports verbal and nonverbal measures, along with fluid reasoning. The WISC five, from twenty fourteen, covers ages six to sixteen. The adult version, the WAIS four, runs from sixteen to ninety. It reports four composite indexes rather than five. The Kaufman ABC two measures sequential and simultaneous processing. And the Woodcock-Johnson four is built on CHC theory, reporting nine broad abilities. Read that list carefully and something important stands out. These are not one trait measured with different degrees of accuracy. Each instrument rests on a different account of what cognitive ability contains.

The Bell Curve

A Score Only Means Something in a Distribution

A raw score, sitting on its own, tells you nothing at all. IQ scores are standardized against a normal distribution. That is a symmetrical, bell-shaped frequency distribution. Its entire job is to place one score among all of the others. For IQ, the mean of that distribution is one hundred. That is average performance for an age group, by construction rather than by discovery. The standard deviation is fifteen. So eighty-five and one hundred fifteen sit one deviation either side of the mean. This is the part students most often get backwards. The score is a position, and not a property. It reports where a performance fell relative to a comparison group, on one occasion. It does not describe a fixed quantity sitting somewhere inside the child.

Classroom Example

When the Profile Changed the Plan

Here is what that distinction looks like in a real classroom. A third-grade teacher has a student who struggles with reading and with math. But the same student excels in verbal discussions, and in creative problem-solving. That mismatch is the signal, so she refers him for evaluation. The WISC five profile comes back, and it is not flat at all. Verbal comprehension is high. Processing speed and working memory are both below average. So the school team designs targeted accommodations for that specific pattern. They do not simply label the student as low-performing and move on. A single composite score would have flattened this child into one word. The separate indices named a specific problem that instruction can actually answer.

Cultural Bias

Whose Experience Is the Test Made Of?

Now the criticisms, which are serious, and which are long-standing. IQ tests have been challenged on cultural fairness, and on construct validity. Construct validity asks a blunt question about any test. Does this instrument actually measure the thing it claims to measure? Critics argue that many traditional IQ tests reflect one fairly narrow world. The experiences, values and communication styles of white, middle-class Western populations. Three kinds of test item carry that problem. Items that rest on specific vocabulary, and items resting on cultural references. And items that quietly reward familiarity with the act of taking tests. Each one puts some students at a systematic disadvantage. The resulting score then underestimates their true cognitive potential.

Flynn And Equity

Rising Scores, and What Rides on a Number

Robert Sternberg and Stephen Ceci pressed this argument considerably further. Performance on an IQ test is not only innate cognitive ability. It also reflects the quality and the content of a student's schooling. Plus language exposure, and cultural familiarity with the testing context itself. Then there is the Flynn effect, which is harder to explain away. Average IQ scores have risen across successive generations. That is very hard to square with a purely hereditary reading of intelligence. Populations do not change their genes that quickly. It suggests environmental factors play a substantial role in measured performance. The cost of ignoring all of this is documented, not hypothetical. Misidentification, and underrepresentation of minority students in gifted programs. And overrepresentation in special education, repeatedly documented across decades of research. So treat an IQ score as one data point among many. Never as a definitive judgment of a student's potential.

About Educational Psychology at UPI Study

Educational Psychology (Psychology 120) is a self-paced online course of 100 video lessons in 11 chapters, from memory, conditioning and child development to motivation, individual differences, assessment, instruction and educational technology. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →

Why take it here

Why students take Educational Psychology with UPI Study

How people learn, and how to teach themEducational Psychology explains how students learn, develop and stay motivated, and how teachers assess and support them. It is a standard course in education and teaching degrees and a common psychology elective.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Educational Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About How Do We Measure How Smart Someone Is? Intelligence Methods

Who created the first intelligence test?
French psychologist Alfred Binet, working with Theodore Simon, created the first practical intelligence scale in 1905. The French government asked Binet to identify students who might need extra educational support, so the test was meant as a screening tool, not a ranking of human worth. It assessed memory, attention and problem-solving and introduced the idea of mental age.
How is IQ calculated from mental age?
In Lewis Terman's original Stanford-Binet scoring, IQ equaled mental age divided by chronological age, multiplied by 100. A child whose mental age matched their chronological age scored 100, meaning average for that age group. For example, a 10-year-old performing like a typical 12-year-old would score 120. Modern tests instead standardize scores against a normal distribution with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15.
What does the WISC-V measure?
The WISC-V, the fifth edition of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, for ages 6 to 16, reports five index scores: verbal comprehension, visual-spatial reasoning, fluid reasoning, working memory and processing speed. School psychologists commonly use it for special education and gifted evaluations. The profile can reveal patterns a single score hides, such as high verbal comprehension with below-average processing speed, which can guide targeted accommodations.
Are IQ tests culturally biased?
Critics argue that many traditional IQ tests reflect the experiences, values and communication styles of white, middle-class Western populations, raising concerns about construct validity, or whether a test measures what it claims to. Items relying on specific vocabulary, cultural references or test-taking familiarity can disadvantage some students. The Flynn effect, rising average scores across generations, also suggests environmental factors play a substantial role.

About the Educational Psychology course

How many college credits is Educational Psychology?
Educational Psychology (Psychology 120) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Educational Psychology cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 100 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Educational Psychology take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 100 lessons total about 15 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Educational Psychology.

100 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Educational Psychology →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Educational Psychology
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →