Tech in the Classroom: Real-World Examples, Explained

UPI Study › Courses › Educational Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 11.1 Free with a free account

Tech in the Classroom: Real-World Examples

Educational Psychology · Chapter 11: Technology, Digital Tools, and the Future of LearningSection 11.1 · lesson 97 of 10010 min · free with a free account

← Can We Apply This Everywhere? Generalizing Research Findings in EducationNext lesson: Learning Online: What Works and What Doesn't →

Earn 3 college credits for Educational PsychologyRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Psychology 120 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Educational Psychology · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

What technology integration looks like when it is designed, not just purchased.

  • Explain why instructional design, not the tool, drives impact
  • Use the SAMR model to judge depth of integration
  • Describe how an LMS and response systems change a class
  • Compare blended learning models and the TPACK framework

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,274 words). Read along, or search it.

Technology, Digital Tools, and the Future of Learning

Tech in the Classroom

Buying technology is easy. Integrating it is not. And the research is blunt about which one produces learning. This section is a tour of what integration actually looks like. We start with the principle that governs all of it. Then the SAMR model, a four-level test for depth of integration. Then learning management systems, and one teacher using one well. Then interactive boards and student response systems. Then gamification, and where it goes wrong. Then flipped and blended learning, and the models inside them. And finally what teachers need to know to make any of it work. That last part turns out to be the binding constraint.

First Principle

The Tool Is Never the Point

The modern classroom has changed profoundly over the past two decades. Chalkboards once dominated instructional spaces. Now interactive displays and cloud-based platforms carry the learning. Along with devices held by the students themselves. But the shift is not merely cosmetic, and it is not automatic. Purposeful integration can increase engagement and deepen understanding. The word doing the work in that sentence is purposeful. It means aligned with clear pedagogical goals. Educational psychologists put it more directly. The tool itself is never the point. It is the instructional design surrounding the tool that determines effectiveness. Integration sits on a spectrum, from projecting old content to publishing new work.

SAMR

Four Levels of Integration

The SAMR model gives you a way to locate yourself on that spectrum. It names four levels of technology integration. The first is substitution. Technology acts as a direct tool substitute, with no functional change. The same task, in a new medium. The second is augmentation. Still a substitute, but now with a functional improvement. The task gets easier, or faster, or more accurate. The third is modification, and this is where the shift happens. Technology allows significant redesign of the task itself. The fourth is redefinition, where wholly new tasks become possible. Tasks that were previously inconceivable without the technology. Effective integration pushes consistently toward those top two tiers.

The LMS

The Organizational Backbone

Learning management systems are the organizational backbone. Canvas, Google Classroom, Schoology and Blackboard are the common platforms. A teacher can distribute assignments and communicate with families. Organize course content by unit, and track submission status. And provide written or rubric-based feedback, all in one hub. For students, it is a persistent, organized learning environment. Available at any time, from any device. Research from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation found a pattern here. Students who regularly engage with the system outside class hours do better. Higher rates of assignment completion, and better academic outcomes. Google Classroom has seen explosive adoption at the K through twelve level. Canvas is widely used in higher education, with more granular control.

Classroom Example

Knowing What to Reteach by Tuesday

Here is what an LMS changes for one teacher, concretely. Ms. Rivera teaches seventh-grade science. She uses Canvas to flip her classroom. Each Monday she posts a short instructional video. And a Google Form pre-assessment alongside it. By Tuesday morning she has reviewed the student responses. So she knows exactly which concepts require reteaching. And she knows it before lab work begins, not after. In class, students who mastered the content work on an enrichment challenge. Meanwhile she works in small groups with those who need support. This kind of data-driven differentiation needs the infrastructure. The value is not the video. It is knowing in advance who needs what.

Boards And Clickers

Making Collective Thinking Visible

Interactive whiteboards turn the front of the room into a live surface. The SMART Board and the Promethean ActivPanel are the common examples. Teachers can annotate over digital content and launch embedded simulations. They can drag and drop elements to demonstrate a process. And save the notes afterward for distribution. The research on their impact, though, is genuinely mixed. Effects depend heavily on teacher proficiency and pedagogical approach. Several meta-analyses show modest positive effects on engagement and achievement. But only when the boards are used interactively. Used as passive display screens, they are an expensive projector. Student response systems solve a different problem. Traditional questioning lets a few confident students dominate the discussion. Marzano and colleagues found classes using them gained twenty-six percentile points.

Gamification

Mechanics That Work, and Ones That Backfire

Gamification applies game-design mechanics to non-game contexts. Points, badges, leaderboards, challenge levels, narrative progression. When it works, it works by leveraging intrinsic motivational drivers. Autonomy, which comes from choosing your challenge level. Mastery, which comes from visible skill progression. And purpose, which comes from narrative meaning. Duolingo, Prodigy Math and Classcraft embed these deeply. They produce measurable gains in time spent on task. And in voluntary practice outside of school hours. But researchers caution against superficial gamification. Adding sticker charts to rote tasks is the standard example. That can undermine intrinsic motivation over time, rather than build it. The app stores are full of educational apps with almost no evidence behind them.

Flipped And Blended

Moving the Lecture Out of the Room

The flipped classroom inverts the traditional instructional sequence. Direct instruction happens at home. By video lecture, by podcast, or by annotated slides. Class time is then devoted to application and discussion. And to collaborative problem-solving, which needs other people in the room. The model is particularly powerful at secondary and post-secondary levels. The reason is economic as much as pedagogical. Lecture content can be recorded once and reused for years. Blended learning is the broader umbrella term. It combines face-to-face and online instruction in any structured ratio. Both models depend on one precondition, and it is fragile. Students must complete the at-home portion and arrive ready to engage. In communities with limited home internet, that is an equity problem.

Blended Models

Four Shapes, and One Worth Knowing Well

The Clayton Christensen Institute identifies six primary blended models. Four of them are worth naming. In the Rotation model, students rotate on a fixed schedule. Between online stations and face-to-face stations. In the Flex model, students move through a primarily online curriculum. With teachers providing flexible support around it. In the A La Carte model, students take some courses entirely online. And pursue others in person. In the Enriched Virtual model, face-to-face sessions are required. But most coursework is completed online. Station Rotation deserves particular attention for practical reasons. A class of thirty splits into three groups of ten, rotating in one period. The Rand Corporation found such schools outperformed matched peers over two years.

At A Glance

Common Classroom Tools

A quick survey of tools you will meet in real classrooms. Canvas is a learning management system for course management and grading. It serves K through twelve and higher education, centralizing course activity. Google Classroom handles assignment distribution and feedback at K through twelve. Its key benefit is integration with the wider Google Workspace. The SMART Board supports interactive instruction in K through twelve rooms. Its benefit is dynamic visual presentation, when used interactively. Kahoot is used for formative assessment and review at every level. It drives engagement through competition. Nearpod runs interactive lessons and polling, giving real-time response data. Pear Deck handles formative checks and discussion. Its distinctive benefit is anonymous student voice. Notice how many of these do the same job. The choice is pedagogical, not technical.

What Teachers Need

TPACK, and the Divide That Persists

Even the most powerful technology fails without teacher capacity. Research identifies professional development quality as the strongest predictor. The strongest single predictor of successful integration outcomes. Yet schools often train teachers in the least effective ways. One-time workshops. Vendor demonstrations. Sessions focused on tool navigation rather than pedagogical application. The TPACK framework, from Mishra and Koehler, names what is needed. Content knowledge, meaning deep understanding of the subject matter. Pedagogical knowledge, meaning expertise in teaching and learning strategies. And technological knowledge, meaning proficiency with the relevant tools. Genuine innovation lives where all three overlap, and that is hard to build. One last caution. Warschauer and Matuchniak documented a digital use divide. Closing the access gap does not close the gap in how technology gets used.

About Educational Psychology at UPI Study

Educational Psychology (Psychology 120) is a self-paced online course of 100 video lessons in 11 chapters, from memory, conditioning and child development to motivation, individual differences, assessment, instruction and educational technology. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →

Why take it here

Why students take Educational Psychology with UPI Study

How people learn, and how to teach themEducational Psychology explains how students learn, develop and stay motivated, and how teachers assess and support them. It is a standard course in education and teaching degrees and a common psychology elective.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Educational Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Tech in the Classroom: Real-World Examples

What is the SAMR model?
The SAMR model, developed by Ruben Puentedura, describes four levels of technology integration: substitution, augmentation, modification and redefinition. In substitution, technology replaces a tool with no functional change; in augmentation, it adds a functional improvement; in modification, it allows significant redesign of the task; and in redefinition, it makes previously inconceivable tasks possible. Effective integration pushes toward the top two levels.
What is the TPACK framework?
TPACK, developed by Punya Mishra and Matthew Koehler, describes the knowledge teachers need to integrate technology well: technological, pedagogical and content knowledge, and especially the overlap of all three. Content knowledge is understanding the subject, pedagogical knowledge is expertise in teaching strategies, and technological knowledge is skill with tools. Training focused only on tool navigation misses that overlap.
What is the difference between a flipped classroom and blended learning?
A flipped classroom moves direct instruction, such as video lectures, to home so class time can go to application, discussion and problem-solving, while blended learning is the broader term for any structured mix of face-to-face and online instruction. Blended models named by the Christensen Institute include Rotation, Flex, A La Carte and Enriched Virtual. Both depend on students completing online work, which raises equity concerns where home internet is limited.
Does gamification improve learning?
Gamification can improve engagement when it taps intrinsic drivers such as autonomy, mastery and purpose, and apps like Duolingo, Prodigy Math and Classcraft have produced measurable gains in time on task and voluntary practice. Superficial gamification, such as adding sticker charts to rote tasks, can undermine intrinsic motivation over time. As with other classroom technology, the instructional design around the tool matters more than the tool.

About the Educational Psychology course

How many college credits is Educational Psychology?
Educational Psychology (Psychology 120) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Educational Psychology cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 100 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Educational Psychology take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 100 lessons total about 15 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Educational Psychology.

100 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Educational Psychology →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Educational Psychology
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →