Learning to Be Good: Moral Development and Kindness in Schools

UPI Study › Courses › Educational Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 5.4 Free with a free account

Learning to Be Good: Moral Development and Kindness in Schools

Educational Psychology · Chapter 5: Identity, Language, Morality, and the Whole ChildSection 5.4 · lesson 41 of 1008 min · free with a free account

← Speaking More Than One Language: Why It Matters in SchoolsNext lesson: Is It Right or Wrong? Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Thinking →

Earn 3 college credits for Educational PsychologyRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Psychology 120 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Educational Psychology · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

Thinking, feeling and acting, and why rules alone produce compliance.

  • Name the three dimensions of moral development
  • Contrast heteronomous with autonomous morality
  • Explain empathy as the engine of prosocial behavior
  • Calibrate moral discussion to a student's developmental level

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,085 words). Read along, or search it.

Identity, Language, Morality, and the Whole Child

Learning to Be Good: Moral Development and Kindness in Schools

A child breaks a cup while helping, and another breaks one while sulking. Ask a five-year-old which was worse and you may be surprised. Often they will say the first, because more cups broke. That answer is not a failure of character. It is a stage of reasoning. This section covers moral development in children. We will look at its three dimensions, which are easy to collapse into one. Then the shift from judging outcomes to judging intentions. Then empathy and prosocial behavior, and whether they can be taught. And what character education actually requires to work. The claim throughout is that moral development is not learning rules.

Definition

Three Dimensions, Not One

Moral development is the process by which children acquire values. Values, beliefs, and the thinking abilities that guide judgments. Judgments about right and wrong. And it has three dimensions that get collapsed together too easily. The cognitive dimension is how children think about moral dilemmas. The emotional dimension is how they feel about ethical situations. The behavioral dimension is how they act in social contexts. Those three come apart in practice, constantly. A student can reason well and still not act. Unlike academic skills, this follows no single testable curriculum. There is no unit on it, and no exam at the end. It nevertheless shapes the social fabric of every classroom.

The Shift

From Outcomes to Intentions

Children's moral reasoning changes qualitatively with age. Not just in what they conclude, but in how they decide. Young children often judge actions by their outcomes. A broken vase is wrong, regardless of intent. Older children increasingly consider intentions. They consider context, and the well-being of others. So what drives that shift? Two forces working together. Cognitive maturation, which makes the reasoning possible. And social learning, which supplies the content. As children observe models, receive feedback, and solve problems together, their moral frameworks expand and deepen.

Piaget's Terms

Heteronomous and Autonomous Morality

Piaget gave those two ways of reasoning names. Heteronomous morality is the earlier stage. Rules are seen as fixed and absolute. They come from authority, and they do not vary. Actions are judged by outcomes rather than intentions. Autonomous morality is the later stage. Rules are now seen as social agreements. Made by people, for reasons, and capable of being different. And intentions matter in moral judgment. Notice why the second is harder to teach than the first. It requires holding two things at once. That a rule is real, and that people made it and could change it. A child in the earlier stage hears that second half as permission.

Prosocial Behavior

Both Outcome and Driver

Prosocial behavior is voluntary action intended to benefit others. Sharing. Helping. Comforting. And it occupies an interesting double position. It is both an outcome of moral development and a driver of it. Children who regularly act prosocially develop three things. Stronger empathy. More sophisticated moral reasoning. And greater peer acceptance. Those three, in turn, make prosocial action more likely. So the loop runs in both directions. Which tells a teacher something useful about where to intervene. The intervention point is the behavior, and not only the belief.

Empathy

The Emotional Engine

Empathy is the capacity to understand and share another's feelings. And it serves as the emotional engine of moral behavior. That phrase is worth taking seriously. Moral reasoning alone does not reliably produce moral action. Plenty of people can explain why something is wrong, and do it anyway. Empathy supplies the motive that reasoning lacks. Now here is the finding that matters for teaching. Research suggests empathy can be explicitly taught and modeled. In ordinary classroom settings. With measurable effects on peer relationships and conflict resolution. That is not an obvious result. Empathy is usually treated as a temperament some students happen to have.

Building It

Where Empathy Gets Practiced

So where does empathy actually get built? Schools that foster it deliberately use four approaches. Structured programs, designed for the purpose. Cooperative learning tasks, which require taking another's view. Literature that centers diverse perspectives. And teacher modeling of compassionate responses. Three structures create the regular opportunities. Circle time. Class meetings. Restorative practices. Each gives students a routine occasion to express moral awareness. And to develop it, rather than only display it. The payoff shows up in two measurable ways. Children become less likely to bully. And more likely to intervene when they witness injustice.

Key Idea

Not Just Knowing Rules

Here is the key idea, stated against a common misconception. The misconception is that moral development means learning rules. Teach the rules well, and moral behavior follows. In reality it involves a complex interplay of three things. Thinking. Knowing why something is right or wrong. Feeling. Actually caring about others' well-being. And acting. Choosing the prosocial option when it costs something. Which tells us what character education programs need to do. Programs that address all three dimensions are most effective. They produce genuinely ethical behavior. Programs that address only the first produce something else. They produce compliance, which looks the same until nobody is watching.

Character Education

Five Elements That Carry It

Five elements carry character education in practice. Explicit instruction. Directly teach values like honesty, respect and fairness. Class discussions on ethical scenarios are the usual vehicle. Modeling. Staff demonstrate the values they teach. The strongest version is a teacher apologizing and repairing when wrong. School culture. School-wide norms reinforce the same values. A kindness wall, or student recognition programs. Cooperative learning. Peer interaction builds perspective-taking and fairness. Group projects with genuinely shared responsibility. And restorative practices. Repair harm through dialogue. Rather than through punishment alone. Conflict resolution circles are the standard form.

In Practice

A Weekly Class Meeting

Here is one of those structures working in a third-grade class. After repeated conflicts on the playground, the teacher acts. She institutes weekly class meetings, with a fixed structure. First, students share their feelings using I statements. Second, they identify the impact their actions had on others. Third, they brainstorm solutions collaboratively. Same three steps, every week. Within a month, something notable happens. Students begin applying the process independently. During unstructured time, with no teacher present. That transfer is the evidence that matters. It distinguishes internalized moral reasoning from rule-following.

Calibration

Match the Discussion to the Age

One final principle. Moral instruction must be calibrated. Calibrated to cognitive development, like anything else. Children between about four and seven reason concretely. Fairness means equal treatment, and rules are fixed. Children between eight and eleven begin to consider intent. Intent, and context, alongside the outcome. Adolescents can engage with abstract principles and moral dilemmas. And mismatches fail in both directions. A dilemma about competing principles is unusable for a seven-year-old. They will resolve it by asking which rule is bigger. A rule handed down with no reasons insults a fifteen-year-old. And they will treat it accordingly.

About Educational Psychology at UPI Study

Educational Psychology (Psychology 120) is a self-paced online course of 100 video lessons in 11 chapters, from memory, conditioning and child development to motivation, individual differences, assessment, instruction and educational technology. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →

Why take it here

Why students take Educational Psychology with UPI Study

How people learn, and how to teach themEducational Psychology explains how students learn, develop and stay motivated, and how teachers assess and support them. It is a standard course in education and teaching degrees and a common psychology elective.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Educational Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Learning to Be Good: Moral Development and Kindness in Schools

What is the difference between heteronomous and autonomous morality?
Heteronomous and autonomous morality are Piaget's names for earlier and later moral reasoning. In heteronomous morality, rules are fixed, absolute and handed down by authority, and actions are judged by outcomes, so a young child may say breaking several cups by accident is worse than breaking one while misbehaving. In autonomous morality, rules are seen as social agreements that people made and could change, and intentions matter in moral judgment.
What are the three dimensions of moral development?
Moral development has cognitive, emotional and behavioral dimensions. The cognitive dimension is how children think about moral dilemmas, the emotional dimension is how they feel about ethical situations, and the behavioral dimension is how they actually act with others. These can come apart, since a student may reason well about right and wrong and still not act on it. Character education that addresses all three tends to work better than teaching rules alone.
Can empathy be taught in schools?
Research suggests empathy can be explicitly taught and modeled in ordinary classrooms, with measurable effects on peer relationships and conflict resolution. Schools build it through structured programs, cooperative learning, literature that centers diverse perspectives, and teacher modeling of compassionate responses, along with routines like circle time, class meetings and restorative practices. Empathy matters because it supplies the motive to act morally that reasoning alone often lacks.
How should moral discussions with children differ by age?
Moral discussions should match children's cognitive development. Children around four to seven reason concretely, seeing fairness as equal treatment and rules as fixed, while children around eight to eleven begin weighing intent and context alongside outcomes. Adolescents can engage with abstract principles and moral dilemmas. Mismatches fail both ways: a dilemma about competing principles is unusable for a seven-year-old, and a rule given with no reasons tends to alienate a teenager.

About the Educational Psychology course

How many college credits is Educational Psychology?
Educational Psychology (Psychology 120) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Educational Psychology cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 100 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Educational Psychology take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 100 lessons total about 15 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Educational Psychology.

100 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Educational Psychology →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Educational Psychology
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →