Why We Forget, and Why That Is Okay | Educational Psychology

UPI Study › Courses › Educational Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 2.6 Free with a free account

Why We Forget, and Why That Is Okay

Educational Psychology · Chapter 2: Memory, Thinking, and the Learning MindSection 2.6 · lesson 11 of 1009 min · free with a free account

← Never Forget Again: Memory Tricks That Actually WorkNext lesson: Mental Filing Cabinets: How We Organize What We Know →

Earn 3 college credits for Educational PsychologyRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Psychology 120 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Educational Psychology · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

Five mechanisms of forgetting, and a different instructional response to each.

  • Distinguish decay, interference, retrieval failure and encoding failure
  • Interpret the Ebbinghaus forgetting curve for review scheduling
  • Contrast proactive and retroactive interference
  • Explain why some forgetting is adaptive rather than defective

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,203 words). Read along, or search it.

Memory, Thinking, and the Learning Mind

Why We Forget, and Why That Is Okay

A student swears they studied, and they probably did. By Friday it is gone anyway. The reflex is to call that a failure of effort, or of memory. It is neither. Forgetting is not one thing, and it is not always a fault. This section takes forgetting apart into five distinct mechanisms. Decay. Proactive interference. Retroactive interference. Retrieval failure. And encoding failure. Each has a different cause, and each needs a different response from a teacher. We will also meet the Ebbinghaus forgetting curve, which tells you when to review. And we will make the case that some forgetting is a feature, not a bug.

Decay Theory

Traces That Fade Without Use

Start with the oldest explanation, decay theory. It proposes that memory traces naturally fade over time. Those traces are sometimes called engrams. They fade if they are not reactivated through rehearsal or use. This biological erosion is thought to occur primarily in short-term memory. There, information not rehearsed within about thirty seconds is simply lost. Whether decay also happens in long-term memory is more controversial. Some researchers argue that long-term memories never truly decay at all. Instead, they become less accessible over time. That distinction sounds academic, and it is not. Something inaccessible can be recovered with the right cue. Something decayed cannot.

The Forgetting Curve

Ebbinghaus, and the First 24 Hours

Hermann Ebbinghaus gave us the most famous curve in memory research. He derived it from systematic self-experiments in the late nineteenth century. He memorized meaningless material and tracked how much survived. The result has a very distinctive shape. Memory declines steeply within the first twenty-four hours after learning. Then the curve levels off. Most of what you are going to lose, you lose almost immediately. That shape has a direct instructional consequence. A brief review session shortly after initial learning flattens the curve substantially. Far more information is preserved over time. Note what the curve says about timing versus length. When you review matters more than how long you review.

Interference

Memories Competing for Retrieval

Interference theory offers a different account, and both can be true. It proposes that memories compete with one another for retrieval. One memory can push another out of reach. There are two directions, and the names describe the direction. Proactive interference is when previously learned information disrupts newer material. Retroactive interference reverses that. New learning disrupts earlier learning. Take a student who studied Spanish and then began studying French. The Spanish vocabulary interferes with recall of the new French words. That is proactive interference, old blocking new. Now imagine the same student, months later, trying to recall the Spanish. The French gets in the way. Same student, opposite direction. The direction determines what a teacher should do about it.

Managing Interference

Similarity Is What Does the Damage

Interference is not random, which is good news for lesson planning. Interference effects are strongest when competing memories are similar. Two unrelated topics do not fight. Two adjacent ones do. So instructional sequencing can reduce it, deliberately. First, separate the study of highly similar content. Do not teach two easily confused concepts back to back. Second, use interleaving. Alternate practice between different topics. That reduces confusion between similar concepts rather than reinforcing it. Third, teach students to recognize the distinctions explicitly. Naming the difference between two ideas is itself an intervention. A student who can articulate the contrast has two traces, not one blurred one.

Retrieval Failure

Stored, but Out of Reach

The third mechanism is the most interesting, and the most hopeful. Retrieval failure theory is associated with Endel Tulving. It rests on his encoding specificity principle. Forgetting often reflects a mismatch between cues. The cues present at encoding, and the cues available at retrieval. So information may be stored in long-term memory and still be unreachable. It is available, but not accessible. Those are different states. You have felt this distinction directly. Recognizing a correct answer the moment you see it, when you could not generate it on your own a second earlier. This changes the diagnosis for a student who blanks on a test. They may not have failed to learn. They may have failed to find.

Two More Causes

Motivated Forgetting and Encoding Failure

Two more mechanisms complete the picture. Motivated forgetting is described in psychodynamic theory. It has some experimental support as well. It refers to the tendency to forget information that is emotionally threatening. Or that provokes anxiety. Encoding failure is the last one, and it is the sneakiest. Here the material was never properly encoded in the first place. Usually because attention was elsewhere when it arrived. It is a major contributor to what looks like forgetting. And from the outside, it is indistinguishable from forgetting. But it needs the opposite response. There is nothing to review, because nothing was ever stored.

Key Idea

Forgetting Can Be Adaptive

Now for the reframe that this section is really built around. Forgetting is not simply failure. It is a multi-mechanism process, and it can be adaptive. The brain selectively retains what matters and discards what does not. Consider what the alternative would actually be like. A system that retained everything with equal vividness. Every conversation, every number plate, every irrelevant detail. Such a system would be overwhelmed and unable to function efficiently. So perfect memory is not the ideal that our flawed memory falls short of. It is a different design, and a worse one. Teachers who understand this design instruction that works with memory. Rather than resenting it for behaving exactly as it should.

The Curve

Where Review Has to Land

The forgetting curve tells you exactly where to put a review. At the moment of learning, recall is near complete. In the first hours afterward, the decline is steepest. Most of the loss happens in that window, before anyone notices. By twenty-four hours, the curve levels off, and much is already gone. Add a review, and the shape changes. The curve flattens, and far more is retained. So here is the instruction, and it is unusually specific. Review before the loss, not after it. A review scheduled a week later is repair work. A review scheduled the next day is prevention. Same activity, very different value, decided entirely by the calendar.

Five Mechanisms

Each Cause Has Its Own Response

Each mechanism has its own instructional response, and they differ. Decay means traces fade without reactivation. So review before material is lost. Proactive interference means old learning disrupts new recall. So separate similar subjects, and teach the distinctions clearly. Retroactive interference means new learning disrupts old recall. So review previously learned content after introducing new topics. Retrieval failure means the stored memory lacks the right cue. So vary retrieval contexts, and use cued recall practice. Encoding failure means inattention at the time of learning. So establish attention before instruction begins, not during it. Five causes, five different fixes. Applying the wrong fix is why some review sessions change nothing.

In Practice

Molarity and Molality

Watch a teacher use this diagnostically. A chemistry teacher finds students consistently confuse molarity and molality. Two terms, one letter apart, meaning different things. She does not treat this as carelessness or as poor studying. She recognizes the pattern as proactive interference between similar terms. That diagnosis leads to a specific redesign. She rebuilds the instruction to explicitly compare and contrast the two concepts. She provides a clear mnemonic to separate them. And she adds multiple spaced practice opportunities. The goal is stable, distinct memory traces for each term. The problem was never that students had not studied. It was that two traces had blurred into one.

About Educational Psychology at UPI Study

Educational Psychology (Psychology 120) is a self-paced online course of 100 video lessons in 11 chapters, from memory, conditioning and child development to motivation, individual differences, assessment, instruction and educational technology. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →

Why take it here

Why students take Educational Psychology with UPI Study

How people learn, and how to teach themEducational Psychology explains how students learn, develop and stay motivated, and how teachers assess and support them. It is a standard course in education and teaching degrees and a common psychology elective.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Educational Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Why We Forget, and Why That Is Okay

What are the main theories of forgetting?
The main explanations of forgetting are decay, interference, retrieval failure, encoding failure and motivated forgetting. Decay says unused traces fade, mainly in short-term memory. Interference says memories compete. Retrieval failure means stored information lacks the right cue. Encoding failure means the material was never stored, often because attention was elsewhere. Each cause calls for a different teaching response.
What is the Ebbinghaus forgetting curve?
The Ebbinghaus forgetting curve shows that memory drops steeply within the first twenty-four hours after learning and then levels off. Hermann Ebbinghaus derived it in the late nineteenth century from experiments on himself using meaningless material. The practical lesson is timing: a brief review soon after learning flattens the curve substantially, and when you review matters more than how long.
What is the difference between proactive and retroactive interference?
Proactive interference happens when older learning disrupts recall of newer material, and retroactive interference happens when new learning disrupts recall of older material. A student who learned Spanish and then struggles to remember new French words is showing proactive interference. If French later blocks the Spanish, that is retroactive. Interference is strongest when the competing memories are similar.
Is forgetting a bad thing?
Not necessarily; forgetting is often adaptive. The brain selectively keeps what matters and discards what does not. A memory that retained every conversation, number plate and irrelevant detail with equal vividness would be overwhelmed and unable to work efficiently. Understanding this helps teachers design instruction that works with memory, such as scheduling reviews, instead of treating every lapse as a failure.

About the Educational Psychology course

How many college credits is Educational Psychology?
Educational Psychology (Psychology 120) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Educational Psychology cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 100 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Educational Psychology take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 100 lessons total about 15 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Educational Psychology.

100 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Educational Psychology →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Educational Psychology
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →