UPI Study › Courses › Educational Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 8.2 Free with a free account
Checking In vs. Wrapping Up: Formative and Summative Assessment
Educational Psychology · Chapter 8: Assessment, Testing, and Making Sense of ResultsSection 8.2 · lesson 71 of 1008 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Educational Psychology.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Educational Psychology
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: What Makes a Good Test, Actually? Qualities, Validity, and Reliability →← How Do We Know What Students Know? Types of AssessmentNext lesson: What Makes a Good Test, Actually? Qualities, Validity, and Reliability →
In this lesson
Formative and summative assessment, and the feedback loop that connects them.
- Define formative assessment and its distinguishing attribute
- Define summative assessment and its real instructional value
- Describe the five strategies of effective formative practice
- Explain why feedback timing changes learning outcomes
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,123 words). Read along, or search it.
Assessment, Testing, and Making Sense of Results
Checking In, and Wrapping Up
There is a well-worn line about assessment that is worth starting from. Weighing the pig does not make it heavier. That is true of some assessment, and false of the rest. This section is about which is which. We begin with formative assessment, which happens during instruction. Then the five strategies Wiliam and Black identified. Then summative assessment, and a misconception about it. Then feedback, and why specific feedback outperforms grades. And finally the feedback loop, which is the engine of the whole practice. Here is the claim to watch for throughout. What makes an assessment formative is not its format. It is its use.
Formative
Assessment That Happens During, Not After
Formative assessment refers to ongoing, low-stakes evaluation practices. The critical detail is when they occur. They occur during the instructional process, not after it. Summative assessments judge learning after instruction ends. Formative assessment works as a diagnostic instrument instead. It reveals what students understand in real time. That lets teachers adjust instruction before misconceptions solidify. The common strategies are all quick and cheap to run. Exit tickets, and think-pair-share activities. Whiteboard responses, and classroom polling technology. And quick quizzes, which look formal but need not be.
Immediacy
The Attribute That Defines It
One attribute distinguishes formative assessment from everything else. Immediacy. Data collected today directly informs tomorrow's lesson. Now push on that definition, because it has a sharp consequence. Suppose the data cannot change what happens next. Then the assessment is not doing formative work at all. It does not matter what you happen to call it. Which means a quiz can be formative, or summative. It depends entirely on what you do with the results. The format does not decide the category. The use decides it.
Five Strategies
Wiliam and Black on Effective Practice
Dylan Wiliam and Paul Black are pioneers in formative assessment research. They identified five key strategies of effective formative practice. First, clarifying learning intentions. Students should know what success actually looks like. Second, engineering effective discussions. Third, providing feedback that moves learners forward. Not feedback that merely reports a verdict. Fourth, activating students as learning resources for each other. Fifth, activating students as owners of their own learning. Taken together, those five change what a classroom is for. They shift it from a performance arena into a learning environment. One where mistakes are welcomed as diagnostic information. Rather than condemned as failures.
Summative
Assessment That Delivers a Verdict
Summative assessment sits at the other end of the process. It evaluates learning at the conclusion of an instructional period. That might be a unit, a semester, or a whole academic year. Its primary purpose is to make a judgment. Has this student achieved the intended learning outcomes? Final examinations are the obvious example. So are standardized state tests, AP exams, and cumulative projects. Summative data feed into grading systems and promotional decisions. They also feed into accountability reports. Because the stakes are higher, the quality bar has to be higher. Validity, reliability and fairness must be particularly rigorous here. You are judging a student, so the instrument had better hold up.
The Misconception
Summative Data Are Not Wasted
There is a common misconception about summative assessment. That it has no instructional value, because it comes too late. Teaching is already complete by the time the data arrive. In practice, well-designed summative assessments do several jobs. First, the assessment can itself be a learning experience. A final project that asks students to synthesize across a unit teaches. Second, the data travel forward to the next teacher. They inform that teacher's understanding of the incoming class. Third, the data guide curriculum revision. They help schools identify systemic instructional gaps. So the data are late for one student, but early for the next. That is only true if somebody actually reads them.
Feedback
Specific Beats Encouraging
The phrase assessment for learning captures the central insight. Assessment's greatest power is not certifying achievement. It is accelerating achievement. That happens when feedback is timely, specific, and actionable. Here is what usable feedback sounds like. Your thesis is clear, but two paragraphs need evidence from the text. The student knows exactly what to do next. Now here is what unusable feedback sounds like. Good work. Or, try harder. Both of those fail the student, and for the same reason. Neither provides any usable information about what to change. Research consistently shows specific feedback beats grades alone.
The Loop
Assess, Feedback, Adjust, Reassess
Formative practice runs as a loop, and the loop has four stages. You assess. You provide feedback. You adjust instruction. Then you reassess. That cycle is the engine of formative assessment practice. But notice the condition on which the loop actually closes. It closes only when students act on the feedback. And when teachers then observe whether the gap has narrowed. Feedback handed back and never revisited does not close anything. That is the most common way this practice fails in real classrooms. The comments get written. The loop never closes. So build in the moment where students respond to what you wrote.
Extending It
Bringing Students Inside the Loop
The loop can be extended, by bringing students inside it. Peer feedback and self-assessment do exactly that. They bring students themselves into the evaluative process. Students learn to identify what quality work looks like. They apply criteria to a peer's writing. And they reflect honestly on their own performance. That last one is harder than it sounds, and it is teachable. What all three build are metacognitive skills. Those are the skills that support lifelong learning. Consider what a student gains from this in the long run. Someone who can evaluate work against criteria has a portable tool. They no longer need a teacher present in order to improve.
At A Glance
Six Dimensions of Difference
Six dimensions separate the two kinds of assessment cleanly. Purpose. Formative guides instruction in real time. Summative judges achievement at the end. Timing. Formative happens during instruction, summative after it. Stakes. Formative is low, and often ungraded. Summative is high, and contributes to the final grade. Examples. Exit tickets, polls and quizzes on one side. Finals, state tests and projects on the other. Feedback. Immediate and specific, against delayed and summary. And use of data. Formative adjusts tomorrow's lesson. Summative grades, promotes, and reports. Read the last row again. It is where the whole distinction lives.
In Practice
Three Piles, and Five Minutes
Here is the whole loop running in one middle school classroom. Mr. Osei teaches eighth grade mathematics. After each lesson he posts a three-question exit ticket on the board. Students submit their responses before leaving. That evening he sorts the tickets into three piles. Got it. Almost there. Need reteach. The next morning he opens class with a five-minute targeted review. That review is for the need reteach group only. Meanwhile the got it group begins an extension problem. This structured loop has measurably reduced unit test failures. Research by John Hattie explains why the timing works. Feedback ranks among the highest-impact influences on achievement. But only when it is timely, and only when it is specific.
About Educational Psychology at UPI Study
Educational Psychology (Psychology 120) is a self-paced online course of 100 video lessons in 11 chapters, from memory, conditioning and child development to motivation, individual differences, assessment, instruction and educational technology. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Educational Psychology with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Educational Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Checking In vs. Wrapping Up: Formative and Summative Assessment
What is the difference between formative and summative assessment?
Can a quiz be a formative assessment?
What are the five key strategies of formative assessment?
What makes feedback effective for learning?
About the Educational Psychology course
How many college credits is Educational Psychology?
How much does Educational Psychology cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Educational Psychology take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Educational Psychology.
100 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →