UPI Study › Courses › Educational Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 1.3 Free with a free account
What Actually Makes a Great Teacher?
Educational Psychology · Chapter 1: Foundations of Education and LearningSection 1.3 · lesson 3 of 10011 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Educational Psychology.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Educational Psychology
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Five Ways to Think About Learning →← How People Learn: Psychology Meets the ClassroomNext lesson: Five Ways to Think About Learning →
In this lesson
Seven competencies the evidence keeps finding, and why they are learnable.
- Explain why effective teaching is multidimensional, not a single trait
- Distinguish subject knowledge from pedagogical content knowledge
- Contrast preventive and reactive classroom management
- Apply formative assessment and culturally responsive practice
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,471 words). Read along, or search it.
Foundations of Education and Learning
What Actually Makes a Great Teacher?
What actually separates a competent teacher from a great one? It is a fair question, and the honest answer disappoints people who want a shortcut. There is no single trait, and no single technique. Effective teaching is multidimensional, and the research on this is unusually consistent. In this section we will name seven competencies that the evidence keeps identifying. Subject knowledge, management, communication, empathy, reflection, assessment, and cultural responsiveness. We will look at what each one actually means in a classroom. And we will look at the single most encouraging finding in this whole literature. These skills are learnable. Nobody is born with them. That is the claim on which teacher education rests.
Science And Art
Great Teaching Is Multidimensional
Researchers have attacked this question from several directions. Classroom observation studies, student achievement data, and teacher self-reports. Two names dominate the field. John Hattie synthesized over eight hundred meta-analyses of student achievement. That is a study of studies of studies, which is about as broad as evidence gets. Charlotte Danielson built the Framework for Teaching. It is among the most widely used teacher evaluation tools in the United States. Both point to the same thing. Not a trait, but a constellation of competencies. And here is the finding that matters most for anyone entering the profession. The skills underlying great teaching are learnable and improvable. Clarity of explanation, responsiveness to error, culturally responsive practice. Deliberate reflection and professional development move all of them.
Seven Competencies
The Constellation Research Keeps Finding
Seven competencies, and they are not a menu you pick from. Subject knowledge and clarity of communication. Classroom management and formative assessment. Empathy, reflective practice, and cultural responsiveness. Think of them as interlocking rather than as a checklist. Cultural responsiveness without subject knowledge is warmth with nothing to teach. Subject knowledge without formative assessment never finds out whether anything landed. Management without empathy produces compliance, and not much else. Each of the seven is worth understanding on its own terms. So we will take them one at a time, and then put them back together.
Subject Knowledge
Knowing It Is Not Knowing How to Teach It
Start with the obvious one, which turns out to be less obvious than it looks. Deep, flexible content knowledge is foundational. Teachers who thoroughly understand a subject can explain it in several different ways. They correct misconceptions with precision, and connect topics a novice sees as separate. But knowing a subject is not the same as knowing how to teach it. Lee Shulman named the difference. He called it pedagogical content knowledge. Effective teachers know how to represent their subject for learners. They anticipate the common errors, and they know which analogy is the powerful one. Take a mathematics teacher with strong pedagogical content knowledge. She knows how to solve the problem, which any competent mathematician can do. She also knows why students confuse a particular step, and how to pre-empt that confusion. That second kind of knowledge is what teacher preparation is really building.
Classroom Management
Prevention Beats Reaction
Classroom management is the competency new teachers worry about most. They are right to. It is among the most critical, and the most challenging. Effective managers do three things consistently. They set clear expectations from day one. They use consistent routines, which minimizes time lost in transitions. And they address disruptions calmly, without escalating the conflict. Research by Emmer and Evertson found something specific about timing. Teachers who invest in building classroom structures during the first few weeks of school spend significantly less time managing behavior throughout the rest of the year. The investment is front-loaded, and it pays out for months. Here is the deeper point, and it is easy to miss. The best management is preventive, not reactive. Good instruction itself reduces behavior problems, by keeping students engaged.
Communication
Clarity, and the Three-Second Pause
Communication sounds soft until you see how precisely it can be studied. Effective teachers communicate with precision, enthusiasm and sensitivity. They use language matched to their students' developmental level. They check for understanding frequently, and give instructions that are specific. Nonverbal communication carries more than people expect. Eye contact, where you stand, how you use the space. All of it signals attention. But the most striking finding in this area concerns silence. It comes from wait time research, published by Rowe in nineteen seventy-two. Pause for at least three seconds after asking a question. The quality and the quantity of student responses both increase dramatically. Three seconds feels like an eternity when you are standing at the front. It is the difference between hearing from the fastest student and hearing from everyone.
Empathy
Care Is a Competency, Not a Temperament
Now to something that resists measurement, but has been measured anyway. Nel Noddings developed what she called an ethics of care. A growing body of relationship research supports it. Teachers who genuinely care about students produce better academic and social outcomes. What does caring look like in practice? It is more concrete than it sounds. Learning students' names quickly. Noticing when a student is struggling, emotionally or academically. And communicating high expectations alongside genuine support. That combination is the whole thing, and either half alone fails. The message is, I believe you can do this, and I will help you. Claude Steele calls an environment built on that message a wise environment. It reduces stereotype threat, and it promotes belonging for all learners.
Reflective Practice
Closing the Loop on Your Own Teaching
Donald Schon gave us the phrase reflective practitioner. It describes a professional who learns from their own practice. Systematically examining decisions, their effects on students, and how to improve. In concrete terms, that means four habits. Analyzing student data to identify patterns in the errors. Seeking feedback from peers and supervisors, which takes some courage. Adjusting lessons in response to student confusion, rather than pressing on. And staying current with educational research. Teaching without reflection is like driving without checking your mirrors. You may be fine. You have no way of knowing. Reflection closes the loop between what a teacher intends and what students experience. Those two things diverge far more often than any of us would like.
Formative Assessment
Finding Out Before It Is Too Late
Dylan Wiliam's research put a number on something teachers half-knew. Frequent, low-stakes formative assessment is among the most powerful drivers of achievement. The techniques are unglamorous and cheap. Exit tickets. Cold-calling. Mini-whiteboards. Think-pair-share. Compare that with summative assessment, which is tests and final exams. Summative assessment evaluates learning at the end of an instructional period. Formative assessment gives you real-time data while you can still act on it. And here is where many teachers stop one step short. Effective formative assessment is not just checking for understanding. It is using that information to change what you do next. The point is to catch confusion before it solidifies into failure. A check you do not act on is a check you did not need to run.
Cultural Responsiveness
Embedded, Not Bolted On
Geneva Gay and Gloria Ladson-Billings established the research base for this competency. Teachers who acknowledge and affirm students' cultural identities get better outcomes. So do teachers who use culturally relevant examples. And critically, teachers who hold high academic expectations for all students. The effects are largest for students from historically marginalized groups. Three moves make it real, and none of them is a poster on a wall. First, examine your own assumptions about students and their families. Second, learn about the communities your students actually come from. Third, deliberately design instruction that honors diverse ways of knowing. Notice that culturally responsive teaching is not an add-on to effective practice. It is embedded within it, and the high-expectations half is not optional.
The Indicators
What Each Competency Looks Like in Practice
It helps to know what each competency looks like when you observe it. Subject knowledge shows up as explaining a concept several different ways. Classroom management shows up as routines you can see running without instruction. Communication shows up as precise language, and as deliberate wait time. Empathy shows up as high expectations delivered together with support. Reflective practice shows up as data-informed self-evaluation. Formative assessment shows up as frequent checks that change the next ten minutes. Cultural responsiveness shows up as relevant examples and equitable expectations. These indicators are what teacher evaluation frameworks are actually looking for. They are also what you can practice deliberately, one at a time.
The Evidence
The Teacher Is the Variable That Moves
Hattie's Visible Learning synthesis produced one headline finding. The teacher is the most influential school-related factor in student achievement. More influential than curriculum. More than class size. More, within the school, than socioeconomic background. And within teaching, three things carry the highest effect sizes of any intervention. Teacher clarity. Feedback quality. Classroom discussion. Watch how these arrive together in one real sequence. Ms. Rivera teaches eighth-grade English to students from many cultural backgrounds. Before a short-story unit, she surveys families about their narrative traditions. She picks stories with diverse characters, and keeps the literary complexity high. She runs exit tickets daily, and adjusts her mini-lessons to the patterns she sees. After one confusing lesson, she re-teaches using an analogy a student suggested. That is four competencies inside a single unit, which is how they actually appear.
About Educational Psychology at UPI Study
Educational Psychology (Psychology 120) is a self-paced online course of 100 video lessons in 11 chapters, from memory, conditioning and child development to motivation, individual differences, assessment, instruction and educational technology. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Educational Psychology with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Educational Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About What Actually Makes a Great Teacher?
What qualities make an effective teacher?
What is pedagogical content knowledge?
What is a reflective practitioner in teaching?
What is culturally responsive teaching?
About the Educational Psychology course
How many college credits is Educational Psychology?
How much does Educational Psychology cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Educational Psychology take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Educational Psychology.
100 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →