UPI Study › Courses › Educational Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 6.9 Free with a free account
Choice, Competence, and Connection: Self-Determination Theory
Educational Psychology · Chapter 6: Motivation, Goals, and the Drive to LearnSection 6.9 · lesson 56 of 1009 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Educational Psychology.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Educational Psychology
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Taking Charge: Self-Regulated Learning and Teacher Expectations →← I Think I Can, or I Am Good At This: Self-Efficacy and Self-ConceptNext lesson: Taking Charge: Self-Regulated Learning and Teacher Expectations →
In this lesson
Three universal needs, and the continuum from compliance to identification.
- Name the three basic psychological needs in SDT
- Explain why the needs are not hierarchical
- Place a student's reason for engaging on the regulation continuum
- Use autonomy-supportive language to promote internalization
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,087 words). Read along, or search it.
Motivation, Goals, and the Drive to Learn
Choice, Competence, and Connection: Self-Determination Theory
This is the theory that ties the whole chapter together. Self-Determination Theory, from Deci and Ryan. It proposes three psychological needs that are universal. Autonomy, competence, and relatedness. We will define each one, including a common misreading of autonomy. Then the motivation continuum, which has five positions rather than two. We will look at internalization, and what moves a student along it. And at the claim that makes this theory practically useful. That value can be taught, even for content nobody finds fascinating. Which describes most of a curriculum, honestly.
The Foundation
Three Universal Psychological Needs
Self-Determination Theory was developed by Edward Deci and Richard Ryan. Over several decades of research. It is currently among the most comprehensive theories of motivation. And among the most empirically supported. It begins from a premise about human beings. Humans are inherently active organisms. With natural tendencies toward growth, integration and self-determination. That premise matters, because it reverses the usual question. The question is not how to motivate a passive person. It is what conditions allow an already-active person to engage. And the theory names three basic psychological needs as universal. Their satisfaction promotes well-being and intrinsic motivation. Regardless of culture, of age, or of context.
The Three
Autonomy, Competence, Relatedness
The three needs are autonomy, competence and relatedness. Autonomy is the need to feel that behavior is self-initiated. Self-initiated and volitional. That you are the author of your actions. Competence is the need to feel effective. Effective in your interactions with the environment. To experience mastery, and to grow in capability. Relatedness is the need to feel meaningfully connected to others. To care for others, and to be cared for. One common misreading is worth heading off immediately. Autonomy does not mean independence. It does not mean freedom from all constraints. It means acting with psychological freedom, and identifying with what you do.
Key Idea
Not a Pyramid
Here is a structural point that distinguishes this from Maslow. SDT's three needs are not hierarchical. There is no pyramid, and no order of operations. All three are equally fundamental. And they must be addressed simultaneously. Consider what that rules out. A classroom can be warm and connected, satisfying relatedness. And still be controlling, which starves autonomy. That classroom will still undermine intrinsic motivation. It is a common failure, and a well-intentioned one. A caring teacher who leaves students no genuine choice has met one need and blocked another.
When They Are Frustrated
The Path to Amotivation
What happens when these needs are chronically frustrated? Motivation deteriorates. Well-being suffers. And at the extreme, amotivation may develop. Amotivation is the complete absence of motivation. No intention to act at all. It is a distinct state, and this is worth being precise about. It is not simply a very low level of extrinsic motivation. Which matters diagnostically. An amotivated student is not weighing a reward and finding it too small. Offering a bigger reward will not reach them. They have stopped expecting their actions to matter at all. That belief is what has to be addressed first.
The Continuum
Motivation Is Not Two Categories
SDT does not treat motivation as simply intrinsic or extrinsic. It recognizes a spectrum of regulatory styles. Running from fully external to fully internal. External regulation is the first position. Behavior is controlled entirely by external consequences. Rewards, and punishments. Introjected regulation is the next step along. Rules are somewhat internalized. The student complies to avoid shame, or to gain approval. But they do not identify with the value of the activity. Introjection feels internal, and it is not. The pressure now comes from inside the student. It is still pressure, and it still costs well-being.
Further Along
Identified and Integrated Regulation
Two further positions on the continuum are more autonomous. Identified regulation is when the student personally values the activity. Values its importance, even if it is not inherently enjoyable. I study chemistry because I want to become a doctor. That is an extrinsic reason, and it is genuinely the student's own. Integrated regulation goes one step further. It is the most autonomous form of extrinsic motivation. The activity is fully assimilated into one's sense of self and values. Now consider which of these a teacher can realistically aim at. Most school content is not intrinsically interesting to most students. So identified regulation is the realistic target. And it produces genuine, durable engagement.
Five Regulations
Reason and Effect Compared
Five positions, and each has a characteristic reason for engaging. Amotivation. No locus of control at all. No intention to act, and often hopelessness. External regulation. Fully external locus. The reason is to get a reward, or to avoid punishment. Introjected regulation. Somewhat internal. The reason is to avoid shame, or to gain approval. Identified regulation. Largely internal. The reason is that the activity's importance is personally valued. Integrated regulation. Internal. The reason is that the activity fits one's sense of self. Read that as a ladder rather than a sorting of students. Internalization is a process, and the environment sets the direction.
Internalization
What Moves a Student Up the Continuum
So what moves a student up that continuum? Internalization is promoted by environments that satisfy the three needs. Autonomy-supportive contexts in particular. Three features define such a context. Reasons for activities are provided. Student perspectives are acknowledged. And pressure is minimized. The language a teacher uses matters more than seems reasonable. Controlling language undermines internalization. You have to. You must. Autonomy-supportive language facilitates it. You might find it interesting because. Here's why this matters.
The Optimistic Claim
Value Can Be Taught
Here is the claim that makes this theory useful in practice. Even when activities are not intrinsically interesting, students can be helped to identify with their value. And that process has enduring motivational benefits. This is the practically important half of the theory. Most of a curriculum will never be inherently fascinating. Not to most students, and no lesson design fully changes that. Pretending otherwise sets teachers an impossible task. What can change is whether a student sees the point of it. And seeing the point is teachable. In a way that finding something fascinating simply is not. That is a lower bar, and a far more reachable one.
In Practice
A Required Statistics Course
Here are all three needs addressed in one course. A university instructor teaches a required statistics course. Required, which means motivation starts low and external. She faces chronic disengagement, and she addresses each need. For autonomy, students choose their own datasets for every assignment. The content is fixed. The material they work on is theirs. For competence, she redesigns the assessments. Early tasks are scaffolded to guarantee early success. For relatedness, she learns every student's name. And holds brief one-on-one check-ins. By the end of the semester, evaluation scores improve substantially. And several students voluntarily take statistics electives afterward. On a course they were required to take.
About Educational Psychology at UPI Study
Educational Psychology (Psychology 120) is a self-paced online course of 100 video lessons in 11 chapters, from memory, conditioning and child development to motivation, individual differences, assessment, instruction and educational technology. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Educational Psychology with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Educational Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Choice, Competence, and Connection: Self-Determination Theory
What are the three basic psychological needs in self-determination theory?
How is self-determination theory different from Maslow's hierarchy of needs?
What is the continuum of motivation in self-determination theory?
Does autonomy mean letting students do whatever they want?
About the Educational Psychology course
How many college credits is Educational Psychology?
How much does Educational Psychology cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Educational Psychology take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Educational Psychology.
100 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →