UPI Study › Courses › Project Management › Free lessons › Lesson 12.1 Free with a free account
How Global Project Management Bodies Shape the Profession
Project Management · Chapter 12: Professional Organizations and Certification PathwaysSection 12.1 · lesson 72 of 7314 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Project Management.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Project Management
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: PMI and IPMA: Purpose and Certification Value →← Conflict Management and Resolution StrategiesNext lesson: PMI and IPMA: Purpose and Certification Value →
In this lesson
How professional bodies create shared standards and how to read them critically.
- Explain why professional associations exist and the types of bodies in project management
- Distinguish a standard, a guide, a competence baseline and a code of ethics
- Describe how standards are developed and how they have shifted toward principles
- Evaluate a standard by its purpose, date, scope and the judgment it leaves open
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,791 words). Read along, or search it.
Opening Question
Does Risk Mean the Same Everywhere
A hospital project and a factory project both list a risk, and a milestone. Do those words mean the same thing in both places? If they do, it's partly because professional bodies spent decades agreeing on them. People manage projects in construction, software, health care, events and government, often under other job titles. No single employer binds them together. So who sets the shared standards, and should anyone trust them?
Why Associations
Standards, Language, Networking and Public Trust
A profession is an occupation whose members claim specialized knowledge, accept shared standards of conduct, and are trusted by the public to use that knowledge responsibly. Medicine, law and engineering are the familiar examples. A professional association is what people in an occupation join, to pursue the interests they share. Four reasons drive it. Shared standards: agreed descriptions of good practice, so work done in one organization can be understood and checked in another. A common language, so a word like milestone means roughly the same thing in a hospital and in a factory. Networking, through which practitioners find advice, opportunities, and people who've met the same problem before. And public trust: the confidence outsiders place in practitioners, because standards and accountability visibly stand behind them.
Types of Bodies
International, National, Standards-Setting and Chapters
Bodies in this field come in a few types. An international association serves the field across many countries, with a shared framework and community. A national or regional association draws members from one country or region, and its work is shaped by local industry, language and law. A standards-setting body's main work is producing and maintaining agreed written standards, by bringing many interested parties together, rather than recruiting members. And inside associations sits the local chapter: members in one city or region who meet regularly. The types overlap. One organization can be an association and publish standards, so think of them as functions, more than separate kinds.
Two Examples
PMI and IPMA at a Glance
Two international bodies serve as this course's examples. The Project Management Institute, PMI, was founded in 1969 in the United States. It has individual members, organized partly through local chapters. The International Project Management Association, IPMA, founded in 1965, is a federation: its members are national associations, which share an international framework. They differ in structure and emphasis, not in quality. The next lesson compares them, and their credentials, side by side.
What Bodies Produce
Five Outputs From Standards to Chapters
What do bodies produce? Typically five things. Standards and guides: written descriptions of recommended practice. A competence baseline: the knowledge, skills, and behaviors expected of a competent practitioner. It describes the person, not the work. A code of ethics: the conduct a body expects of members and credential holders. It ties the body's authority to how people behave, not to technique. Research and publications, which report what was found, without telling you what to do. And local chapters and networks, through which documents reach practitioners, and experience travels back. A body is less a publisher than a system.
Key Distinction
Standard, Guide and Competence Baseline
Three of these are easy to blur, so hold them apart by the question each one answers. A standard sets out agreed requirements, or recommended practice, that an organization may choose to conform to. It answers: what's recommended or required, and how is it organized? A guide explains practice and options, to inform judgment, without asking for conformance. It answers: what options exist, and what should I weigh? A competence baseline answers: what must a person know, do, and show, to be judged competent? Bodies don't always use these words this way, and a guide may contain passages that read like a standard. So read how a document describes its own purpose, not just its label.
Worked Example
Sorting the Northvale Association's Documents
Try it on a made-up body, the Northvale Project Association. Its first document lists project processes, each with inputs, activities, and outputs. That describes the work, so it's a process standard or guide. An organization would use it to design its own method. Its other document says how members should behave when a conflict of interest arises. That describes conduct, so it's a code of ethics. A firm can follow a process document perfectly, and still employ people who lack the skills. Each document answers a different question, so none replaces another.
Quick Check
A Document Describing Nurse Managers' Abilities
Quick check. A hospital's training team adopts a document. For each of three levels of responsibility, it lists the abilities and attitudes a nurse manager is expected to show when leading a project team. What kind of document is it? Pause, and decide. A competence baseline. It describes the person: what they must know and show, level by level. A process standard would describe the work itself, and a code of ethics would describe conduct, like conflicts of interest.
Changing Standards
From Process-Based to Principles-Based
Standards also change direction over time. A predictive approach plans the whole scope in detail early, then controls the work against that plan. A process-based standard organizes its content as processes, each with inputs, activities, and outputs. Early standards leaned predictive. A principles-based standard is built around a few guiding principles, applied with judgment rather than followed step by step. Agile delivers in short cycles, and hybrid mixes both. PMI's own guide shows the drift. Its seventh edition, in 2021, was rebuilt around twelve principles. Its eighth keeps that base, and brings process guidance back, as non-prescriptive help. So later stages add ideas, rather than erase earlier ones. The older emphasis isn't obsolete, and the newer one isn't a clean break.
Debate
Up-Front Planning Versus Adaptation
Is the shift right? One position says detailed up-front planning remains the better foundation where requirements are stable, and changes are costly or dangerous, as in safety-critical construction. The other says that where learning happens during the work, early detail is false precision, and principles and adaptation waste less effort. The empirical part is which approach performs better, and under which conditions. The evidence often can't separate the approach from the team's skill. The normative part is how much predictability funders may demand, and how much freedom teams should have. This lesson takes neither side.
Standards Development
Volunteers, Consultation and Periodic Revision
How are standards made? Typically by volunteers and committees: practitioners, often supported by their employers, draft documents in working groups. A draft goes out for consultation, where members and other interested people comment. Then it's revised, approved, and later reviewed for periodic updates. Each step has a strength and a limit. Volunteers bring current experience, but people with time and employer support get heard most, so small firms and some regions get heard less. Consultation widens the voices, but text that must satisfy many readers drifts toward general wording. And any scheduled revision lags the practice it describes. So read a published standard as a negotiated, dated summary of a community's thinking, not as a discovery about how projects must be run.
Professionalization
Bodies and the Path to Profession
Professionalization is how an occupation gains a profession's features: a body of knowledge, agreed entry routes, a code of conduct, collective organization, and public recognition. Bodies help by supplying a common vocabulary, defining entry routes, supporting continuing development, and publishing codes of conduct. Is project management a full profession? One view says bodies with baselines, codes, and entry routes are exactly what professionalization looks like. The other says bodies can exist without it. Anyone may call themselves a project manager, much of the work is done under other titles, and the occupation's boundary is unclear. Whether any credential is legally required varies by jurisdiction and sector. That's a question for local regulators, not an assumption.
Influence Debate
Unifying the Field or Crowding Out
A second debate concerns influence. One position: bodies unify the field, and make many practitioners' experience available to people who could never gather it alone. The other: a single vocabulary can crowd out other traditions, and bodies often earn income from what they set norms for, like publications, events, and training. Evidence on whether a shared vocabulary improves outcomes is limited. Both views can be partly true. If you hold either strongly, you should be able to state the other at its best.
Reading Standards
Purpose, Date, Scope and Judgment
So how should you read a standard? As a document with an author, a moment, and an audience. Ask four questions. Purpose: why was it written, for whom, and to support which decisions? Date: when was it written, how has practice moved since, and is there a later revision? Scope: which kinds of project, setting, and size does it cover, and does it claim to apply everywhere? And judgment: what does it leave for you to decide? Take a made-up sentence: plans should be reviewed at regular intervals. Its purpose is to advise, since should isn't must. Its scope is unstated: which kind of project? And it leaves the judgment open: how often, by whom, and what counts as a plan. A two-week check suits a project that learns as it goes. A monthly one suits a stable project. No sentence in the guide can choose for you.
Quick Check
An Outdated Guide for Two-Week Cycles
Quick check. A team running two-week delivery cycles is handed a planning guide that describes tools few teams still use. Which of the four reading questions should it ask first? Pause, and decide. Date. A guide that describes tools few teams still use may be out of date, so check when it was written, how practice has moved since, and whether a later revision exists. Purpose and scope still matter. But neither one flags that the document may simply be out of date, for this way of working.
Applied Case
Choosing What a New Project Office Adopts
One last case. Mei, a project coordinator at a made-up regional manufacturer, must recommend what a new project office should adopt. A national association offers a regional network, a short practice guide with local examples, and events. An international guide offers a complete process description, broad vocabulary, and general scope. Her team is small, there's no earlier project office, and the work mixes predictable equipment installs with uncertain product development. She reads both critically. The international guide is general by design, its revision status needs confirming, and it calls its own content something to tailor. Neither is a legal requirement. She adopts neither as a rulebook. The guide supplies vocabulary and a checklist of processes. The association supplies peers who know the region. Her method: fuller planning for installs, shorter cycles for product work, and a review after the first projects. She gives up saying the office conforms to the guide, for a method that fits.
Case Resolved
Using Bodies Without Surrendering Judgment
Back to the opening question: who decides what risk means? Bodies do much of that agreeing, through volunteers, drafts, and consultation. Should you trust them? Use them for vocabulary and structure, read them for purpose, date, scope, and judgment, and keep the judgment yourself.
Key Takeaways
Bodies, Documents and Critical Reading
To recap: associations exist for shared standards, a common language, networking, and public trust. Bodies come as international, national, standards-setting, and local chapters, and PMI and IPMA are two international examples. Standards, guides, and competence baselines answer different questions, and standards have moved toward principles. Read any standard for purpose, date, scope, and judgment, and keep the judgment yourself.
About Project Management at UPI Study
Project Management (Business 230) is a self-paced online course of 73 video lessons in 12 chapters, from starting and defining a project to planning, budgets, scheduling tools, proposals, contracts, execution, monitoring, closure, teams and certification. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Project Management with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Project Management carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About How Global Project Management Bodies Shape the Profession
What is the difference between a project management standard and a competence baseline?
How has the PMBOK Guide changed in recent editions?
How are project management standards developed?
What four questions should you ask when reading a project management standard?
About the Project Management course
How many college credits is Project Management?
How much does Project Management cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Project Management take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Project Management.
73 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →