UPI Study › Courses › Project Management › Free lessons › Lesson 2.3 Free with a free account
Project Constraints, Opportunity Cost, and Trade-off Analysis
Project Management · Chapter 2: Launching and Defining a ProjectSection 2.3 · lesson 12 of 739 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Project Management.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Project Management
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Project Charter: Components and Purpose →← Developing a Business Case and Feasibility StudyNext lesson: Project Charter: Components and Purpose →
In this lesson
Weighing scope, schedule, cost, quality, resources and risk against each other.
- Explain the six project constraints and how they compare with the triple constraint
- Calculate opportunity cost as the net value of the best alternative forgone
- Rank constraints as fixed, flexible or optimized before pressure arrives
- Score options with a weighted prioritization matrix and record the decision
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,224 words). Read along, or search it.
Opening Question
The Real Cost of Going Faster
Daniel manages the launch of a new chair line at a furniture maker. His sponsor, Renata, brings news: the launch must move two weeks earlier, to land on a trade show. Can the team go faster? Almost always, yes. So that's the wrong question. The right one is: what do we give up to go faster, and who agrees to give it up?
Definition
Six Project Constraints
Constraints are the boundaries a project must be delivered within, and they can't all be satisfied to the fullest at once. This course uses six. Scope limits how much the project delivers. Schedule limits when results must exist. Cost limits what can be spent. Quality limits how much imperfection is acceptable. Resources, the people, equipment and facilities, limit how much work can proceed at once. And risk limits how much exposure to possible loss the organization will accept. Press any one of them, and at least two others respond. A request that seems to be about one constraint is almost always about several.
Comparison
Triple Constraint Versus Six Constraints
Many introductions use only three: scope, schedule and cost, drawn as a triangle with quality in the middle. That's the triple constraint. Its strength is communication. Three are easy to remember, they're the ones sponsors negotiate most, and extra resources or risk mostly show up as cost or schedule anyway. The six-constraint view adds quality, resources and risk as separate limits. Its strength is realism. Sometimes you can cut schedule without changing cost, by adding people. Or hold scope and cost by accepting a riskier method. Folding those into three hides real choices. Whether three-constraint thinkers actually overlook risk more often is a question for evidence. How much to value simplicity is a matter of judgment. This course uses six, as a teaching choice.
Interactions
Pressure on One Constraint Moves Others
The constraints are linked, so pressure on one reappears elsewhere. Back at the furniture maker, the schedule has tightened by two weeks. The team could add weekend shifts. That raises cost, and stretches the people. They could overlap tasks, ordering materials before the design is approved. That raises risk: a late design change wastes the early order. Or they could shorten inspection, which may lower quality, and push problems onto customers. Other chains run other ways. Added scope demands time, money or people. Cutting cost trims scope or quality, or adds risk. Reducing risk costs time and money. So something will move. The questions are what, by how much, and who agreed to it.
Opportunity Cost
Value of the Best Alternative Forgone
Every choice also has an opportunity cost: the value of the best alternative you give up. It isn't the money spent. It's the benefit of the next-best use, forgone. A software team has forty thousand to spend, and room for one project. Both candidates cost forty thousand. These figures are illustrative. Project X, a customer ordering portal, should return a hundred and thirty thousand. Its net benefit: ninety thousand. Project Y, an internal reporting tool, should return a hundred and ten thousand. Net: seventy thousand. Choose X, and the opportunity cost is Y's seventy thousand. Choose Y, and it's X's ninety thousand. So X is better by twenty thousand. The forty thousand spent is the same either way. What differs is what you forgo, and that rests on benefit estimates that are themselves uncertain.
Quick Check
Opportunity Cost of Choosing P
Quick check. A team has fifty thousand, and room for one project. Project P would return a hundred and twenty thousand, and Project Q ninety-five thousand. Each costs fifty thousand. If the team chooses P, what's the opportunity cost? Pause, and work it out. Forty-five thousand: Q's net benefit, ninety-five minus fifty, is what you give up. Seventy thousand is P's own net benefit, and twenty-five thousand is the gap between them. Neither is what's forgone.
Trade-off Analysis
Fixed, Flexible and Optimized Constraints
Trade-off analysis is the structured comparison of options when improving one constraint worsens another: the choice, the options, and the constraints each one affects. Doing it explicitly prevents the commonest failure: a trade-off made by default, where pressure falls wherever resistance is lowest. The best preparation is ranking the constraints before pressure arrives. Fixed means it cannot move, like a legal deadline or a safety standard. Flexible means it may move within stated limits. Optimized means doing as well as possible, without a firm limit. If every constraint is fixed, nothing can absorb pressure, and the project will miss something unpredictably. Agree on the ranking with the sponsor at the start, and record it in the charter.
Worked Example
Scoring Three Launch Options
When several options exist, a prioritization matrix scores each against agreed criteria, with weights. A weighted score is the sum of each weight times the option's score. Weights add to one, and are agreed before scoring, so nobody can tune them toward a favorite. Scores are judgments, and the matrix structures the discussion. Daniel has three options. One: keep the full scope, and add weekend shifts. Two: launch two of the three finishes on time, and the third later. Three: shorten the safety testing. The weights: quality and safety point four, cost point two five, meeting the schedule point two, and risk point one five. Option one totals three point five five. Option two, four point zero. Option three, only two point five five. Option three meets the date perfectly, but it scores one on quality and one on risk, over half the weight. The matrix exposes a choice that looked good on one dimension only.
Quick Check
Scoring a Temporary Supplier
Quick check. A fourth option: hire a temporary supplier. It scores three on quality and safety, three on cost, five on schedule, and two on risk. Using the same weights, what's its weighted total? Pause, and work it out. Three point two five. One point two, plus point seven five, plus one point zero, plus point three. A strong schedule score can't rescue weak quality and risk scores, when those carry most of the weight.
Decision Record
Writing the Trade-off Down
Finally, write the trade-off down. A decision record states what was decided, who decided, the alternatives rejected, and why. For the chair launch: two of three finishes on the earlier date, the third after the show. Decided by Renata, on Daniel's recommendation. Rejected: weekend shifts, too costly for the value, and shorter safety testing, unacceptable on quality and risk. The ranking: safety fixed, the launch date fixed, scope and cost flexible within the approved limit. Effects accepted: visitors can't order the third finish at the show, and one supplier order is split in two. Review point: if either delivery slips by more than a week.
Case Resolution
Deciding Which Constraints Bend
Back to Daniel. His first impulse was to start rearranging the work. Instead, he changed nothing until the choice was written down. He named the constraints the change touched, and with Renata, fixed what could not move: the safety standard, and now the date. Then he scored the options, and Renata signed the record. Only then did any work change. Later, a supplier warned of a delay. Nobody argued: the review point in the record already said what would trigger a new decision. That's the answer to the opening question. You can't maximize every constraint, so decide early, and in writing, which ones bend.
Key Takeaways
Constraints, Opportunity Cost and Records
To recap. Six constraints: scope, schedule, cost, quality, resources and risk. Press one, and others move. Opportunity cost is the value of the best alternative given up, not the money spent. Rank constraints as fixed, flexible or optimized, before pressure arrives. And score options with weights agreed in advance, then record the decision.
About Project Management at UPI Study
Project Management (Business 230) is a self-paced online course of 73 video lessons in 12 chapters, from starting and defining a project to planning, budgets, scheduling tools, proposals, contracts, execution, monitoring, closure, teams and certification. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Project Management with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Project Management carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Project Constraints, Opportunity Cost, and Trade-off Analysis
What is the triple constraint in project management?
How do you calculate opportunity cost when choosing between projects?
What does it mean to rank project constraints as fixed, flexible or optimized?
How does a weighted prioritization matrix compare trade-off options?
About the Project Management course
How many college credits is Project Management?
How much does Project Management cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Project Management take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Project Management.
73 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →