UPI Study › Courses › Project Management › Free lessons › Lesson 1.9 Free with a free account
Professional Ethics and Best Practices in Project Management
Project Management · Chapter 1: Foundations and Framework of Project ManagementSection 1.9 · lesson 9 of 7311 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Project Management.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Project Management
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: From Concept to Kickoff: Project Initiation →← Global Project Management: Success StrategiesNext lesson: From Concept to Kickoff: Project Initiation →
In this lesson
Applying professional values when rules do not settle a decision.
- Distinguish ethics from law and describe four core professional values
- Classify conflicts of interest as real, potential or apparent and respond correctly
- Calculate honest percent complete and identify misreporting
- Apply a step-by-step method to resolve an ethical dilemma
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,441 words). Read along, or search it.
Opening Dilemma
Reporting 65 Percent as 75
Nadia manages a clinic refurbishment for a building contractor. The client's next payment is tied to a milestone: seventy-five percent complete. By her count of finished, checked work, the project is at sixty-five percent. Her manager, Grant, mentions that the company is short of cash this month, and says the report could reasonably say seventy-five. No rule in the contract spells out how to round. So how does anyone decide what's right, when the rules don't settle it?
Definition
Ethics Versus Law
Ethics is the set of principles about right and wrong conduct, that guide choices where no rule gives the answer, or where the rule alone isn't enough. Law is the body of rules made and enforced by governments and courts. The two overlap, but they're not the same. What's legal can still be unethical. A technically true, but misleading, progress statement may be lawful, and still dishonest. And the law is a floor, not a ceiling. Professional ethics usually asks for more. Legal questions themselves go to counsel or compliance, not to guesswork. The ethical thinking continues alongside that advice.
Core Values
Responsibility, Respect, Fairness and Honesty
Professional codes of conduct tend to share four values: responsibility, respect, fairness and honesty. Responsibility is owning your decisions and their consequences, mistakes included. A scheduler whose estimate caused a missed handoff says so the same day. Respect is treating people, their information and their time with consideration, whatever their rank. You credit the junior tester whose idea you used. Fairness is deciding impartially, on agreed criteria, without favoritism. A panel scores every bidder against the same published criteria. Honesty is telling the truth accurately and completely enough that others can rely on it: a milestone two weeks late, and why. Values stay vague until they're tied to actions someone else could watch.
Conflict of Interest
Real, Potential and Apparent Conflicts
The first recurring problem is a conflict of interest: when personal interests, like money, family, friends or future jobs, could influence, or seem to influence, a professional judgment. A real conflict is when the interest actually bears on a decision you're making, like scoring a bid from a firm you hold shares in. A potential conflict could become real as circumstances develop. An apparent one is where a fair-minded observer could suspect bias, even if you're confident there's none. The person with the interest is the least reliable judge of its effect. So the responses don't wait for proof of bias. Disclose it to the sponsor or compliance contact before it affects a decision, and record that you did. Or step aside, and let someone without the interest decide. Disclosure costs little. A hidden interest found later damages trust in every decision the person touched.
Quick Check
A Brother Planning to Bid
Quick check. Next month, a manager's brother plans to bid on a contract the manager will help evaluate. No bids have been opened yet. Real, potential, or apparent? Pause, and decide. Potential. Nothing is being decided yet, but it becomes real the moment the manager scores that bid. So the manager should disclose now, and step aside from that evaluation, before it starts.
Confidentiality
Confidentiality Is Not Secrecy
Confidentiality is the duty to protect information shared in trust, and to use it only for the purpose it was shared for: a client's plans, a vendor's prices, a colleague's personal circumstances. It isn't secrecy. Secrecy hides information from people entitled to it. Confidentiality limits it to those with a legitimate need. Keeping one bidder's price from its competitors is confidentiality. Withholding a known safety problem from the people responsible for safety is not. And the duty has limits. Where the law requires disclosure, or silence would leave people at serious risk, it gives way. Ask counsel or compliance first.
Gifts
Gifts, Inducements and Policies
Meanwhile, Nadia's junior coordinator, Leo, is choosing between two flooring suppliers. One is a little cheaper. The other has invited him to a weekend event. A gift is anything of value given without payment. An inducement is one offered, or seen as offered, to influence a decision. Three features shape how a gift looks. Its value. Its timing: an offer while a decision is pending carries more risk. And the relationship: does the giver gain from your choice? Many organizations write a gifts policy: what you may accept, must decline, or must report. Policies range from small limits with a log, to a ban on gifts from bidders. Under any policy, follow it, and when it's silent or unclear, ask before accepting, and record the answer. Policy design is debated. A total ban is easiest to audit. A threshold with disclosure respects ordinary courtesy, and stops it going underground.
Honest Reporting
Percent Complete From Checked Units
Honest reporting gives sponsors, clients and teams status that is accurate, complete enough to use, and early enough to act on. Status matches the evidence, not the hope. Bad news goes early: a problem raised in week three has options, and in week twelve it usually has none. Misreporting is presenting status falsely or misleadingly, by an untrue statement, or by arranging true ones to create a false picture. Rounding up progress is misreporting. Percent complete is completed units divided by total units, times a hundred. In a fit-out with twenty planned units, fourteen are done and checked: seventy percent. A report of ninety percent claims eighteen units. Eighteen minus fourteen is four units that don't exist: a fifth of the whole project. A good-faith forecast, labeled as a forecast and based on evidence, is fine. Stating something as done when the evidence says otherwise is not.
Quick Check
Counting Units That Do Not Exist
Quick check. A project has thirty planned work units, and twenty-one are done and checked. A status report says ninety percent complete. How many of the units it claims don't exist? Pause, and work it out. Six. Ninety percent of thirty is twenty-seven units. Twenty-seven minus twenty-one is six. The honest figure is seventy percent: twenty-one divided by thirty.
Decision Method
Working Through an Ethical Dilemma
For any dilemma, a fixed sequence helps, because pressure pushes people toward the first idea that relieves the discomfort. Nadia works through it. Identify the facts. Her figure comes from completed, checked work, sixty-five percent. Name those affected: the client, staff and subcontractors, future patients, Grant, and herself. Name the values in conflict: honesty and fairness to the client, against responsibility to colleagues who need the cash. List the options, including a middle one. Report seventy-five. Or report sixty-five with the evidence, and ask the client for an early partial payment for verified work. Weigh the consequences. Seventy-five brings cash, but the client pays for work that doesn't exist, and discovery would harm everyone. Sixty-five is honest, though the payment isn't guaranteed. Decide: she reports sixty-five, proposes the partial payment, and tells the anxious client plainly when the milestone will be met. Escalate or document. If Grant still insists, she takes it to a more senior manager or the ethics contact, and records the instruction. At any step, she can seek advice.
Debate
Internal Routes or Outside Authorities
One part of this is genuinely contested: must you always use internal routes first? One position says yes, almost always. Organizations deserve a chance to correct themselves, internal routes are faster, and outsiders lack context. The other says that where public safety is seriously at risk, or internal concerns were already ignored, going to an outside authority at once is reasonable. This course takes no side. Where law or safety is involved, qualified advice comes first.
Best Practices
Documentation, Lessons and Improvement
Ethical behavior takes courage, but the working environment can make it cheaper. Three practices help. Documentation records decisions, assumptions, instructions and their reasons where others can find them. A written record protects the person who acted correctly. A lessons-learned culture reviews what went well and badly, openly, treating problems as information, not occasions for blame. Where blame rules, people hide bad news. Continuous improvement makes small, evidence-based changes to how work is done. Each concern raised becomes a reason to adjust a policy or checklist. Together, documentation supplies the evidence, reviews share it, and improvement changes practice. They make honesty the easier choice.
Case Resolution
Honest Figure, Legitimate Payment
Back in the clinic, Nadia gives Grant her report: sixty-five percent, with the checked work listed, and a request for an early partial payment for what's verified. Grant isn't pleased. But the partial payment eases the cash strain through a legitimate route, and nobody has to explain a false figure later. That's the answer to the opening question. When rules are silent, values tied to observable actions, and a fixed method, decide what's right.
Key Takeaways
Values Shown as Actions
To recap. The law is a floor, and ethics asks for more. Four values, responsibility, respect, fairness and honesty, show up as actions others can see. Disclose conflicts of interest, protect what's confidential, and ask before accepting a gift. Report status from the evidence, not the hope. And use the method: facts, affected people, values, options, consequences, decide, then escalate or document.
About Project Management at UPI Study
Project Management (Business 230) is a self-paced online course of 73 video lessons in 12 chapters, from starting and defining a project to planning, budgets, scheduling tools, proposals, contracts, execution, monitoring, closure, teams and certification. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Project Management with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Project Management carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Professional Ethics and Best Practices in Project Management
What is a conflict of interest in project management?
How do you calculate percent complete honestly?
What are the four values in project management codes of ethics?
What is the difference between confidentiality and secrecy?
About the Project Management course
How many college credits is Project Management?
How much does Project Management cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Project Management take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Project Management.
73 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →