UPI Study › Courses › Psychology of Personality › Free lessons › Lesson 4.2 Free with a free account
Alfred Adler's Theory of Personality: Development and Birth Order
Psychology of Personality · Chapter 4: Adlerian and Jungian TheoriesSection 4.2 · lesson 27 of 838 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Psychology of Personality.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Psychology of Personality
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Inferiority Complex and Its Role in Adlerian Psychology →← The Psychodynamic Approach: Definitions, Scope, and Key PrinciplesNext lesson: Inferiority Complex and Its Role in Adlerian Psychology →
In this lesson
Personality as a forward-looking strategy for mattering, formed inside a family.
- Explain what Adler meant by the 'style of life'
- Describe how birth order was said to shape striving
- Say why Adler prioritised subjective interpretation
- State what modern research finds about birth-order effects
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,164 words). Read along, or search it.
Adlerian and Jungian Theories
Adler on Development and Birth Order
Ask why someone behaves as they do and Freud looks backwards for a cause. Adler looks forwards, for a purpose. That reversal is the whole of his contribution. He placed social context at the centre of personality. And he treated people as pulled by future goals, not only pushed by the past. This section covers his account of development. And his most famous, and most misused, idea. Birth order. Watch for how carefully he states it, compared to how it usually gets repeated.
The Break
Pulled Forward, Not Only Pushed
Adler broke from a purely drive-based model of personality. In its place he put social context. For Adler the human being is fundamentally goal-directed and social. People are pulled forward by future goals. Not only pushed along by the past. That single reversal changes what you look for when explaining behaviour. A Freudian explanation runs backwards to a cause. Something happened, and this is the residue. An Adlerian explanation runs forwards to a purpose. What is this behaviour trying to achieve for the person?
Style of Life
Everyone Has a Strategy for Mattering
Adler had a name for the guiding movement of a personality. He called it the style of life. It is a unique, largely unconscious strategy. A strategy for pursuing significance and belonging within a social world. His theory as a whole is called Individual Psychology. The name emphasises the unified, goal-directed person. Fictional finalism is his term for a guiding, future-oriented goal. A goal that organises behaviour whether or not it is realistic. And striving for significance is the motive to overcome felt smallness and matter. One clarification about the word unconscious here. It does not mean hidden by repression. It means unarticulated. Most people could not state their style of life, and follow it consistently anyway.
Interpretation
Not What Happened - What the Child Made of It
How does a style of life get formed? It crystallises gradually during the early years. Shaped by the child's interpretation of their family situation. And Adler is emphatic about that word, interpretation. It is not the objective facts of childhood that determine personality. It is the subjective meaning the child gives them. Two children in one household are not really in one household. They are in two differently interpreted ones. That claim has a useful consequence, and a costly one. It explains why siblings raised together can differ so sharply. It also makes the theory hard to check against the family's actual circumstances. If meaning is what matters, the facts cannot settle the question.
Social Interest
What Healthy Development Moves Toward
Adler did not treat every strategy for significance as equivalent. Some are healthier than others, and he said which. A healthy line of development moves toward social interest. That means a felt connection to, and concern for, others. Significance pursued through contribution, rather than in isolation. This is the criterion he used to separate healthy striving from its alternatives. And it is where Adler stands furthest from Freud. Freud's ego negotiates between drive and constraint. Adler's person is oriented toward other people from the very start. Health is then defined by how well that orientation develops.
The Constellation
A Position Among Siblings Is a Psychological Situation
Now the idea Adler is best known for. Birth order, and what he called the family constellation. The constellation is the pattern of relationships among family members. His argument is that a child's position among siblings creates a distinctive psychological situation. The firstborn is initially the sole centre of attention. Then displaced when a sibling arrives. Adler called that dethronement. The second child grows up pacing an established rival. Measuring themselves against someone already further ahead. The youngest is often indulged, and surrounded by pacemakers. And the only child develops without sibling competition at all. Notice that each of these is a description of a situation. Not yet a prediction about a personality.
Four Positions
Situations and Their Interpreted Tendencies
Adler then sketched tendencies for each position. The firstborn, having been dethroned, may become responsible. And may carry a fear of losing status again. The second or middle child, pacing an older sibling, may become competitive. Or may feel squeezed between the ones above and below. The youngest may become ambitious, driven by all those pacemakers. Or at times, dependent. And the only child is often comfortable with adults, and carries high expectations. Read that last column carefully. These are possible tendencies. And two of the four rows list outcomes pointing in opposite directions.
Tendencies
Adler Was Careful Here, and Popular Accounts Are Not
Adler was careful about this, and popular accounts are not. He stressed that these are tendencies tied to the child's interpreted position. They are not rigid laws. Family size modifies the pattern. So does spacing. So do gender and parental attitudes. Which is exactly why the same birth rank produces very different people. The evidence supports his caution rather than the popular version. Modern research finds birth-order effects subtler and more context-dependent. More so than popular accounts suggest. But the underlying insight survived that scrutiny. That perceived social position within the family shapes striving remains influential. Notice what kind of claim that is. It is about interpretation, not about rank.
Worked Example
The Manager Who Controls Every Detail
Take a case where the framework earns its keep. A firstborn manager insists on controlling every detail of a project. The behaviour is easy to label and much harder to explain. The surface reading is perfectionism. But perfectionism is a trait name. It describes and stops there. An Adlerian lens reads a life style organised around responsibility. And behind that, the old fear of being displaced. First felt when a younger sibling arrived. Now be honest about what that explanation is. It is a coherent reading. It is not a demonstrated cause. Its real usefulness is that it suggests something to ask the manager about. Perfectionism, as a label, suggests nothing to ask at all.
Applying It
Ask About Meaning, Not Rank
So how do you apply this responsibly? The framework links family experience to adult motivation. It does that without reducing people to their birth rank. Keeping that distinction is the whole discipline of using it. Do not ask where someone fell in the sibling order. That is a fact about the family, and it predicts much less than folklore claims. Ask instead how they interpreted their early social position. Dethroned. Overshadowed. Indulged. Relied upon. That is the psychologically active variable. Then ask what the strategy is aimed at. Significance and belonging, pursued how? That is the style of life, in operation. The subjective claim cuts both ways, and you should notice both. It makes the theory hard to test. It also keeps it from being a horoscope based on birth certificates.
Consolidate
A Forward-Looking, Socially Embedded Personality
Consolidate what Adler has given us so far. Personality reframed as a style of life, aimed at significance and belonging. It is goal-directed. People are pulled by future aims, not only pushed by the past. Healthy development moves toward social interest. Birth order and the family constellation shape striving. But always through the child's interpretation, never as fixed destiny. And modern research finds those effects real, but subtler than the folklore. Hold one sentence going into the next section. Birth order matters as meaning, never as fate. Because that same interpreted smallness is about to become the centre of the theory. Adler called it the inferiority feeling.
About Psychology of Personality at UPI Study
Psychology of Personality (Psychology 300) is a self-paced online course of 83 video lessons in 13 chapters, from Freud, Adler and Jung to biological, behavioral, cognitive, existential and humanistic theories, traits, personality disorders and culture. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Psychology of Personality with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Psychology of Personality carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Alfred Adler's Theory of Personality: Development and Birth Order
What is style of life in Adler's theory?
What is social interest in Adlerian psychology?
What did Alfred Adler say about birth order?
Does birth order really determine personality?
About the Psychology of Personality course
How many college credits is Psychology of Personality?
How much does Psychology of Personality cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Psychology of Personality take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Psychology of Personality.
83 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →