UPI Study › Courses › Psychology of Personality › Free lessons › Lesson 1.3 Free with a free account
Psychoanalysis, Unconscious Processes, and Personality Assessment
Psychology of Personality · Chapter 1: Foundations of Personality PsychologySection 1.3 · lesson 3 of 8311 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Psychology of Personality.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Psychology of Personality
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Cultural Dimensions of Personality Theory and Research →← Theoretical Frameworks and Historical DevelopmentNext lesson: Cultural Dimensions of Personality Theory and Research →
In this lesson
A theory that failed most of its specific tests and changed the field anyway.
- Explain the levels of consciousness and the structural model
- Describe defense mechanisms and what they are for
- Explain the logic behind projective assessment
- State the criticisms and the surviving contributions precisely
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,434 words). Read along, or search it.
Foundations of Personality Psychology
Psychoanalysis, Unconscious Processes, and Personality Assessment
Here is an awkward fact about the most famous theory in psychology. Many of its specific claims did not survive empirical testing. And it still changed how the entire discipline thinks about the mind. This section holds both of those things at once, because the honest account requires it. We will cover Freud's levels of consciousness, and the structural model of id, ego and superego. We will look at defense mechanisms, and at the assessment methods psychoanalysis produced. Then we will state the criticisms precisely, and the surviving contributions just as precisely. Neither treating Freud as settled science, nor dismissing the tradition wholesale.
The Claim
Most of the Mind Is Not Available for Inspection
Psychoanalysis was founded by Sigmund Freud, and it was the first comprehensive theory of personality. That alone makes it historically pivotal, whatever one concludes about its truth. Its central claim is a single uncomfortable proposition. Much of mental life occurs outside awareness. The unconscious houses desires, memories and conflicts that influence behaviour. Even though the individual cannot directly access them. Sit with the consequence of that for a moment. If it is true, then asking someone why they did something is not a reliable route to the answer. The person answering does not have access to the cause either. Everything difficult about psychoanalysis, as a science, follows from that one consequence.
Levels
Conscious, Preconscious, Unconscious
Freud proposed three levels of consciousness. The conscious mind contains whatever a person is currently aware of. The preconscious holds material that is not in awareness, but can be readily retrieved. Your home address. What you ate last night. Available on request. The unconscious contains thoughts and impulses kept out of awareness. Kept out because they are threatening, or unacceptable. Freud used the metaphor of an iceberg, with only a small portion visible above the surface. And he held the unconscious to be by far the largest and most influential region of the mind. Be careful with that image, though. The metaphor carries a conviction, not evidence for it. It expresses his belief that the most powerful determinants of behaviour lie hidden beneath ordinary self-knowledge. Whether the proportions are anything like that is a separate question the picture cannot settle.
The Structure
Three Systems in Permanent Disagreement
Freud also described a structural model, with three systems in permanent disagreement. The id operates on the pleasure principle. It seeks immediate gratification. The superego operates on the morality principle. It enforces ideals and conscience. And the ego operates on the reality principle. It mediates between the other two, and reality. Conflict among these systems generates anxiety. Which the ego manages through defense mechanisms, such as repression and projection. Strip away the vocabulary and the model is an account of one ordinary predicament. How a mind copes with wanting incompatible things at the same time. That question is real, whatever you think of the answer Freud gave to it.
Defenses
Four Ways the Psyche Protects Itself
Defense mechanisms deserve particular attention, because they show how the psyche was thought to protect itself. Repression pushes threatening material out of awareness. Projection attributes one's own unacceptable impulses to other people. Rationalisation supplies acceptable reasons for behaviour driven by hidden motives. And displacement redirects feelings toward a safer target. Shouting at a colleague after a difficult meeting with your manager. Now the limitation, stated plainly. These concepts are difficult to measure precisely. That is not a quibble about method. It is a serious problem. A construct that cannot be measured cannot be tested. And an untested construct can neither be confirmed nor ruled out. What they retain is descriptive value. They remain useful labels for patterns clinicians observe regularly. Which is a weaker claim than truth. And a stronger one than nothing.
Assessment
If You Cannot Ask, Make Them Fill In the Blank
If people cannot report their own unconscious material, how would you ever assess it? The psychoanalytic tradition answered with projective assessment. Its assumption is that when people respond to ambiguous stimuli, they project unconscious material onto them. The logic rests entirely on the absence of cues. An ambiguous stimulus provides very little external information. So the structure a respondent imposes on it is presumed to come from within. The best-known examples are the Rorschach inkblot test, and the Thematic Apperception Test. In the Rorschach, attention falls on what is seen, where it is seen, and why. In the Thematic Apperception Test, the examiner analyses the narratives a person builds around pictured scenes. Looking for recurring needs, conflicts, and interpersonal themes. Other early techniques applied the same assumption in more structured forms. Word association, and sentence completion, among them.
The Trade-Off
Depth on One Axis, Reliability on the Other
Picture these methods placed on two axes. Clinical depth along one. Reliability and standardisation along the other. The Rorschach sits far out on depth, and low on reliability. The Thematic Apperception Test sits close beside it. Sentence completion, being more structured, moves toward the middle. And objective self-report inventories sit high on reliability, with less depth. The striking thing is that no method sits in the top corner of both. That is not a failure of effort. It is the shape of the trade-off itself.
The Contrast
Richness Bought With Subjectivity
So the two families of method were valued and criticised for opposite reasons. Projective methods were valued for their richness and clinical depth. They surface material a fixed questionnaire has no way of asking about. And they were criticised for low reliability, and subjectivity in scoring. Two trained examiners can read the same protocol and reach different conclusions. Later objective, self-report inventories moved in the opposite direction. They emphasised standardisation and statistical validation. And accepted, in return, that a fixed question can only find what it already asked about. Neither pole is simply correct, which is why the debate is still live. Depth without reliability produces findings nobody else can reproduce. Reliability without depth produces reproducible answers to shallow questions.
The Criticisms
Why It Is No Longer Dominant in Research
Now the criticisms of psychoanalysis, stated without softening. First, many of its propositions are difficult to falsify. A theory that can absorb any result is not being tested by the evidence. Second, its evidence base relied heavily on case studies. Rich individual accounts, rather than systematic comparison across people. Third, some of its specific claims about development have not been supported. These limitations are real, and they explain why the theory is no longer dominant in academic research. That matters as a point of intellectual honesty. Psychoanalysis is not sidelined because it is old, or because it is uncomfortable. It is sidelined because of what happened when its specific claims were tested. Say that plainly, because both of the alternative errors are common. Treating Freud's claims as settled findings. Or dismissing the whole tradition as worthless.
What Survived
The Insight Outlived the Machinery
Nevertheless, the enduring contributions are substantial, and they are specific. The recognition that unconscious processes influence behaviour. That early experience matters. And that people use defensive strategies to manage anxiety. Each of these has been absorbed into mainstream psychology. Often in revised and testable forms that Freud himself would not entirely recognise. Modern research on implicit cognition is the clearest example. Work on automatic processing echoes the core psychoanalytic insight. That much of mental life operates beyond deliberate awareness. Even though the methods and the vocabulary have changed completely. The insight outlived the machinery that first produced it. That is a common pattern in science.
Neo-Analytic
Revised Rather Than Abandoned
Freud's followers and successors did not simply accept or reject the theory. They revised it, forming what is called the neo-analytic tradition. Jung emphasised a collective unconscious, and universal archetypes. Adler stressed social interest, and striving for superiority, rather than sexual drive. Later ego psychologists and object-relations theorists focused on relationships. And on the adaptive functions of the ego, rather than its defensive ones. These revisions kept the core insight about unconscious influence. While broadening the theory's social and developmental scope considerably. The movement illustrates something useful about how theories actually change. By relaxing the most contested claims, and adding attention to culture and relationships. These theorists made psychoanalytic thinking more compatible with later research. Their work is the bridge between classical psychoanalysis and today's integrative perspectives.
Consolidate
The Client Who Keeps Forgetting
Finish with a case small enough to be ordinary. A clinician notices that a client repeatedly forgets appointments. But not at random. The forgetting clusters around one stressful topic. A psychoanalytically informed clinician may interpret that as repression. An unconscious avoidance of anxiety-provoking material the client cannot yet confront directly. Rather than treating it as mere carelessness. Notice that this is an interpretation, not a measurement. The section's criticisms still apply to it. But the alternative reading has a cost of its own. Recognising unconscious influence guards against assuming all behaviour is fully deliberate. So here is the habit worth keeping. When a pattern seems puzzling, or self-defeating, pause before calling it careless. And consider whether an unstated motive, or a defense, might be operating beneath awareness.
About Psychology of Personality at UPI Study
Psychology of Personality (Psychology 300) is a self-paced online course of 83 video lessons in 13 chapters, from Freud, Adler and Jung to biological, behavioral, cognitive, existential and humanistic theories, traits, personality disorders and culture. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Psychology of Personality with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Psychology of Personality carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Psychoanalysis, Unconscious Processes, and Personality Assessment
What are Freud's three levels of consciousness?
What are the id, ego, and superego in Freud's theory?
Is there scientific evidence for unconscious mental processes?
What is the neo-Freudian or neo-analytic tradition?
About the Psychology of Personality course
How many college credits is Psychology of Personality?
How much does Psychology of Personality cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Psychology of Personality take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Psychology of Personality.
83 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →