UPI Study › Courses › Psychology of Personality › Free lessons › Lesson 11.5 Free with a free account
Evaluating the Humanistic-Existential Model: Strengths and Weaknesses
Psychology of Personality · Chapter 11: Humanistic Theories and Their Key FiguresSection 11.5 · lesson 71 of 83video coming soon
← Development of Self: Definitions, Phases, and Psychological SignificanceNext lesson: Humanistic-Existential Model and Abnormal Psychological Functioning →
In this lesson
Clinically influential, scientifically fragile - and both claims are true.
- Identify the model's major strengths
- Explain why its concepts resist measurement
- State the criticism of its view of human nature
- Assess the charge of individualistic bias
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (942 words). Read along, or search it.
Humanistic Theories and Their Key Figures
Evaluating the Humanistic-Existential Model
Empathy and unconditional positive regard are used in counselling rooms everywhere. Meanwhile researchers still cannot measure self-actualization objectively. Both of those facts are about the same body of theory. That is the tension this section is about. A model with enormous clinical influence. And a weak claim on scientific standing. The task is to hold both without collapsing into either.
Strength One
It Put the Whole Person Back in View
Begin with the strengths, because they are not small. The humanistic-existential model restored attention to the whole, conscious person. And to positive dimensions of human life that earlier approaches had largely neglected. Growth. Meaning. Creativity. Free will. Their vocabularies had no place for creativity or for meaning. The word neglected is doing precise work there. These were not topics psychoanalysis and behaviourism disputed. They were topics those approaches were not built to study at all.
Strength Two
Influence Well Beyond Its Own School
The second strength is influence outside its own boundaries. Its optimistic, person-centred stance proved influential in counselling. And in education. And in the later development of positive psychology. By foregrounding subjective experience and human dignity. The approach broadened the questions psychology was willing to ask. That influence is easiest to see where the label was dropped. Agenda-setting is a real form of contribution. A theory can be scientifically weak and still change what a discipline investigates.
Strength Three
The Core Conditions Reshaped Therapy
The third strength is the most concrete of the three. The model produced practical, widely used contributions. Rogers' core therapeutic conditions reshaped psychotherapy. And they remain central to many forms of counselling today. The emphasis on empathy, and on unconditional positive regard, has had lasting clinical value. Empathy is now near-universal advice in counsellor training. You can see it in the everyday practice of counsellors. Including many who would never call themselves humanistic.
The Core Weakness
Concepts That Resist Definition
Now the criticisms, and the central one is methodological. Consider three of the model's most important concepts. Self-actualization. The fully functioning person. Peak experience. Each of these is difficult to define precisely. And difficult to measure scientifically. Which limits empirical testing of the model's central claims. Vagueness here is not a matter of writing style. Critics push the point further than that. They argue some claims rest on vague or unfalsifiable ideas. Rather than on rigorous evidence. And that is a serious charge, not a stylistic complaint. A claim that cannot fail a test is not supported by passing one.
Falsifiability
Why Unfalsifiable Is a Serious Charge
It is worth being precise about what falsifiability means. Falsifiability is the capacity of a claim to be tested, and disproved. Without it, agreement with a theory tells you very little. Because every outcome can be read as confirming it. So the consequence is a low standing in an evidence-based field. Confirmation becomes cheap, and therefore uninformative. And notice how the appraisal has to be written. The model broadens the questions psychology asks. And it scores low on falsifiability. Both of those entries belong in the same evaluation.
Assumption Under Fire
Optimism May Be Underdescribing People
Other critiques concern scope, and the model's founding assumptions. The optimistic view of human nature may underestimate destructive behaviour. And it may underestimate the influence of biology, and of unconscious processes. Which is precisely the territory the two earlier schools had mapped. This is the cost of building on the premise that people are basically good. The dark side of human behaviour is not well accounted for. That premise is not neutral. And what it leaves out is what the model is worst at explaining.
Cultural Scope
Self-Fulfilment as a Culturally Located Ideal
There is also a question about cultural reach. The strong emphasis on individual self-fulfilment has been criticised. Specifically, as culturally biased toward individualistic societies. Note what that criticism targets. It targets the framing, not the phenomena. Where identity is defined communally, the emphasis may misdescribe the goal. It asks whether a model built around the individual's self-realisation. Describes flourishing accurately everywhere it has been applied. And alongside that criticism sits a genuine cultural strength. The model honours human dignity. Both entries belong in the same row of any honest appraisal.
Clinical Limits
Where the Approach Is Insufficient
The therapeutic contribution is real. It is also bounded. On the strength side, the core conditions were influential across orientations. On the limitation side, the approach is limited for severe cases. The stance that works well in one setting is not sufficient in every setting. Some presentations need structure the model does not supply. Naming that boundary is not a dismissal of the approach. It is what allows it to be used where it works. Without being asked to carry what it cannot.
The Verdict
Humane Vision, Limited Precision
A balanced evaluation holds two things together. It recognises the model's humane vision, and its clinical impact. While acknowledging its limited scientific precision. The clearest illustration puts both in one sentence. The widespread use of empathy and unconditional positive regard shows enduring clinical strength. Even as researchers note the difficulty of measuring self-actualization objectively. The two findings do not cancel. They coexist. So value the model for its humane focus on growth, and its clinical contributions. And criticise it for concepts that resist measurement. And for assumptions that may not generalise across cultures.
Consolidate
Five Aspects, Read Both Ways
Five aspects, each read in both directions. On focus, it centres the whole conscious person. But its concepts are hard to measure. On tone, it is optimistic and growth-oriented. But it may ignore the dark side. On therapy, its core conditions are influential. But it is limited for severe cases. On science, it broadens the questions asked. But it scores low on falsifiability. And on culture, it honours dignity. But it carries an individualistic bias. Reading only one column produces a caricature either way. Neither column is the real answer on its own. A model can be clinically indispensable and scientifically fragile at the same time. Holding both of those at once is the mark of having understood it.
About Psychology of Personality at UPI Study
Psychology of Personality (Psychology 300) is a self-paced online course of 83 video lessons in 13 chapters, from Freud, Adler and Jung to biological, behavioral, cognitive, existential and humanistic theories, traits, personality disorders and culture. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Psychology of Personality with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Psychology of Personality carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Evaluating the Humanistic-Existential Model: Strengths and Weaknesses
What did humanistic psychology contribute to psychology?
Why is humanistic psychology criticized as unfalsifiable?
Does humanistic psychology ignore the dark side of human nature?
Is humanistic therapy enough for severe psychological problems?
About the Psychology of Personality course
How many college credits is Psychology of Personality?
How much does Psychology of Personality cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Psychology of Personality take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Psychology of Personality.
83 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →