Critiques and Contemporary Relevance of Behavioral Personality Theory

UPI Study › Courses › Psychology of Personality › Free lessons › Lesson 8.7 Free with a free account

Critiques and Contemporary Relevance of Behavioral Personality Theory

Psychology of Personality · Chapter 8: Behavioral and Learning TheoriesSection 8.7 · lesson 52 of 838 min · free with a free account

← Behavioral Perspectives on Personality Differences and ChangeNext lesson: Cognitive Psychology: Definitions, Theories, and Personality Development →

Earn 3 college credits for Psychology of PersonalityRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Psychology 300 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access

In this lesson

The criticisms are serious and the evidence base is strong - both statements are true at once.

  • State the central criticism of strict behaviorism
  • Explain why animal evidence raises a generalisability concern
  • Say why behavior therapy remains empirically supported
  • Describe how the tradition evolved rather than disappeared

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,101 words). Read along, or search it.

Behavioral and Learning Theories

What Behaviorism Got Wrong, and Why It Survived

Two things are true about behaviorism, and students often want only one of them. The criticisms are serious, and several of them have never been answered. And the therapies it produced are among the best-evidenced in all of psychology. Neither statement cancels the other. This section sets out the standing objections in their strongest form. Then it states, equally plainly, how well the behavioral methods actually work. And it follows the tradition into its modern form. Which is not behaviorism at all, but something built out of it.

The Core Charge

It Leaves Out the Thinking

Start with the central charge, because everything else is a variation on it. Strict behaviorism neglects internal mental processes. Thoughts, beliefs and emotions that clearly influence behavior. Notice what kind of objection that is. It is about completeness, not about accuracy. Critics do not usually argue that the conditioning findings are wrong. They argue that by focusing only on the observable, behaviorism gives an incomplete picture. And that charge lands hardest on the strictest versions of the theory. It lands much more lightly on social-cognitive theory. Which, as we saw, had already conceded the point from the inside.

Three More

The Other Standing Objections

Three further objections deserve to be stated separately. First, behaviorism can underplay biological and genetic influences. Treating predisposition as a backdrop leaves rather little room for it in the explanation. Second, much of its evidence comes from animal studies. And generalization from animals to humans is uncertain. Third, it has been accused of a mechanistic, even deterministic, view of the person. One that downplays human agency and free will. The richness of subjective experience is hard to capture in purely behavioral terms. Of the three, the animal-study objection is the most concrete. Generalizability means how far findings extend beyond the sample studied. A pigeon's schedule of reinforcement is, first of all, a real finding about a pigeon.

Vocabulary

Naming the Criticisms Precisely

It is worth naming these criticisms with the right words. Reductionism means explaining complex phenomena by simpler parts only. Determinism is the view that behavior is fully caused by prior factors. Mentalism is reference to the internal mental states that behaviorism avoided. Free will is the capacity for self-directed choice. And generalizability is how far findings extend beyond the study sample. Precision matters here, because these are different objections. Reductionism and determinism are not the same charge. A theory can be guilty of one and innocent of the other.

The Balance

Strength and Limitation on the Same Row

Now set the strengths and limitations side by side, dimension by dimension. On scientific method, behaviorism is objective and measurable. It may also oversimplify. On treatment, it produces highly effective therapies. They address symptom rather than insight. On cognition, it was later integrated. It was ignored in the early forms. On evidence base, the empirical support is strong. The reliance on animal work is heavy. And on its view of the person, it is optimistic about change, and it downplays agency. Read that table across the rows, not down the columns. Because in every case the limitation is the cost of the strength beside it. These are not unrelated flaws sitting next to unrelated virtues.

The Counterweight

Say Plainly How Well It Works

Now the counterweight, stated as plainly as the criticisms were. Behavior therapy and applied behavior analysis are among the most empirically supported interventions in psychology. That is a strong claim, and it is not a rhetorical one. They are used for phobias, for addictions, and for developmental support. And the precision and measurability of behavioral methods continue to set a standard. A standard for what evidence-based practice means. Meaning intervention that is grounded in empirical support rather than in tradition. This is a stronger record than most schools of personality theory can claim. And it is not an accident. The tradition's insistence on measurable outcomes is exactly what allowed its treatments to be tested. And then to pass.

Where It Lives

The Tradition Today

So where do behavioral principles actually live today? In behavior therapy, which applies learning principles directly to change behavior. In applied behavior analysis, in schools, clinics and homes. In cognitive-behavioral therapy, where they are combined with work on thought. And in the broader standard of evidence-based practice. The overall assessment is easy to state. The behavioral approach is strong on rigor and on treatment. It is weak on inner experience. And it is in daily clinical use in spite of that weakness, not in ignorance of it.

The Evolution

It Did Not Vanish, It Merged

The most important fact about behaviorism's fate is often stated wrongly. It did not lose an argument and disappear. The tradition evolved rather than vanished. Three steps got it there. The cognitive revolution reopened mental processes as a legitimate object of study. Bandura's social-cognitive theory integrated those processes with learning principles. Combining them, rather than replacing one with the other. And the result was cognitive-behavioral therapy. One of the most widely practiced approaches in psychology today. So behavioral ideas persist across modern psychology, refined, and combined with cognition.

In Practice

Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety

Cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxiety shows the merger in a single treatment. It combines behavioral exposure with work on unhelpful thoughts. The behavioral half is graded exposure. Directly descended from conditioning, and from extinction. The cognitive half examines the beliefs that maintain the anxiety. Which is exactly the material Watson ruled out of psychology in nineteen thirteen. And the two halves are not a compromise between rival camps. Each addresses something the other cannot reach. So the tradition lives on in an integrated, evidence-based form. Rather than in its original one.

The Judgement

Holding Both Statements at Once

Which leaves a judgement to make, and it is an uncomfortable one. A theory can be philosophically inadequate and clinically excellent at the same time. Behaviorism is criticised for neglecting cognition, biology and agency. And for leaning heavily on animal research. It also produces some of the most reliable treatments psychology has. Students often want to resolve that tension in one direction. Resist that. The correct answer is that both halves are true. And they are true about different questions. Ask whether it explains what a person is, and the criticisms bite hard. Ask whether it changes what a person does, and the evidence is strong.

Consolidate

What to Take from the Whole Chapter

Three things to carry out of this chapter. Behavioral theory is criticised for neglecting cognition, biology and agency. And for relying on animal studies whose generalization to humans is uncertain. It remains highly relevant through empirically supported therapies. And through its integration into cognitive-behavioral approaches. Step back and the chapter has the shape of a science correcting itself. Watson's rule was too strict. Hull loosened it for drives. Bandura loosened it for attention and memory. And the cognitive revolution completed the repair. The findings survived the rule that produced them. Which is, in the end, the best thing you can say about any scientific programme.

About Psychology of Personality at UPI Study

Psychology of Personality (Psychology 300) is a self-paced online course of 83 video lessons in 13 chapters, from Freud, Adler and Jung to biological, behavioral, cognitive, existential and humanistic theories, traits, personality disorders and culture. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Compare: Abnormal Psychology vs Psychology of Personality

Why take it here

Why students take Psychology of Personality with UPI Study

What makes each person who they arePsychology of Personality compares the major explanations of why people differ: psychoanalytic and neo-analytic theories, biology and evolution, learning, cognition, existential and humanistic views, and trait models, plus how personality is measured and studied. It is a common course in psychology degrees.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Psychology of Personality carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Critiques and Contemporary Relevance of Behavioral Personality Theory

What are the main criticisms of behaviorism?
The central criticism of behaviorism is that it neglects internal mental processes such as thoughts, beliefs, and emotions, giving an incomplete picture of the person. Critics also say it underplays biological and genetic influences, relies heavily on animal studies whose generalization to humans is uncertain, and takes a mechanistic, deterministic view that downplays agency and free will. The incompleteness charge hits strict behaviorism hardest and social-cognitive theory much less.
What is the difference between reductionism and determinism in critiques of behaviorism?
Reductionism means explaining complex phenomena only by their simpler parts, while determinism is the view that behavior is fully caused by prior factors. They are separate charges, and a theory can be guilty of one without the other. Behaviorism is called reductionist for explaining conduct through learned stimulus and response links, and deterministic for downplaying free will, the capacity for self-directed choice.
Is behavior therapy effective?
Yes, behavior therapy and applied behavior analysis are among the most empirically supported interventions in psychology. They are used for phobias, addictions, and developmental support, and their precise, measurable methods helped define evidence-based practice. That record follows from behaviorism's insistence on measurable outcomes, which allowed its treatments to be tested. A theory can be philosophically incomplete and still produce clinically excellent treatments.
How did behaviorism lead to cognitive-behavioral therapy?
Behaviorism evolved into cognitive-behavioral therapy rather than disappearing. The cognitive revolution reopened mental processes to study, Bandura's social-cognitive theory combined them with learning principles, and CBT emerged as one of today's most widely practiced therapies. CBT for anxiety shows the merger: graded exposure descends from conditioning and extinction, while the cognitive half examines the beliefs that keep the anxiety going.

About the Psychology of Personality course

How many college credits is Psychology of Personality?
Psychology of Personality (Psychology 300) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Psychology of Personality cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 83 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Psychology of Personality take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 83 lessons total about 8 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Psychology of Personality.

83 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Psychology of Personality
3 credits · NCCRS
Enroll →