UPI Study › Courses › Psychology of Personality › Free lessons › Lesson 8.7 Free with a free account
Critiques and Contemporary Relevance of Behavioral Personality Theory
Psychology of Personality · Chapter 8: Behavioral and Learning TheoriesSection 8.7 · lesson 52 of 838 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Psychology of Personality.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Psychology of Personality
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Cognitive Psychology: Definitions, Theories, and Personality Development →← Behavioral Perspectives on Personality Differences and ChangeNext lesson: Cognitive Psychology: Definitions, Theories, and Personality Development →
In this lesson
The criticisms are serious and the evidence base is strong - both statements are true at once.
- State the central criticism of strict behaviorism
- Explain why animal evidence raises a generalisability concern
- Say why behavior therapy remains empirically supported
- Describe how the tradition evolved rather than disappeared
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,101 words). Read along, or search it.
Behavioral and Learning Theories
What Behaviorism Got Wrong, and Why It Survived
Two things are true about behaviorism, and students often want only one of them. The criticisms are serious, and several of them have never been answered. And the therapies it produced are among the best-evidenced in all of psychology. Neither statement cancels the other. This section sets out the standing objections in their strongest form. Then it states, equally plainly, how well the behavioral methods actually work. And it follows the tradition into its modern form. Which is not behaviorism at all, but something built out of it.
The Core Charge
It Leaves Out the Thinking
Start with the central charge, because everything else is a variation on it. Strict behaviorism neglects internal mental processes. Thoughts, beliefs and emotions that clearly influence behavior. Notice what kind of objection that is. It is about completeness, not about accuracy. Critics do not usually argue that the conditioning findings are wrong. They argue that by focusing only on the observable, behaviorism gives an incomplete picture. And that charge lands hardest on the strictest versions of the theory. It lands much more lightly on social-cognitive theory. Which, as we saw, had already conceded the point from the inside.
Three More
The Other Standing Objections
Three further objections deserve to be stated separately. First, behaviorism can underplay biological and genetic influences. Treating predisposition as a backdrop leaves rather little room for it in the explanation. Second, much of its evidence comes from animal studies. And generalization from animals to humans is uncertain. Third, it has been accused of a mechanistic, even deterministic, view of the person. One that downplays human agency and free will. The richness of subjective experience is hard to capture in purely behavioral terms. Of the three, the animal-study objection is the most concrete. Generalizability means how far findings extend beyond the sample studied. A pigeon's schedule of reinforcement is, first of all, a real finding about a pigeon.
Vocabulary
Naming the Criticisms Precisely
It is worth naming these criticisms with the right words. Reductionism means explaining complex phenomena by simpler parts only. Determinism is the view that behavior is fully caused by prior factors. Mentalism is reference to the internal mental states that behaviorism avoided. Free will is the capacity for self-directed choice. And generalizability is how far findings extend beyond the study sample. Precision matters here, because these are different objections. Reductionism and determinism are not the same charge. A theory can be guilty of one and innocent of the other.
The Balance
Strength and Limitation on the Same Row
Now set the strengths and limitations side by side, dimension by dimension. On scientific method, behaviorism is objective and measurable. It may also oversimplify. On treatment, it produces highly effective therapies. They address symptom rather than insight. On cognition, it was later integrated. It was ignored in the early forms. On evidence base, the empirical support is strong. The reliance on animal work is heavy. And on its view of the person, it is optimistic about change, and it downplays agency. Read that table across the rows, not down the columns. Because in every case the limitation is the cost of the strength beside it. These are not unrelated flaws sitting next to unrelated virtues.
The Counterweight
Say Plainly How Well It Works
Now the counterweight, stated as plainly as the criticisms were. Behavior therapy and applied behavior analysis are among the most empirically supported interventions in psychology. That is a strong claim, and it is not a rhetorical one. They are used for phobias, for addictions, and for developmental support. And the precision and measurability of behavioral methods continue to set a standard. A standard for what evidence-based practice means. Meaning intervention that is grounded in empirical support rather than in tradition. This is a stronger record than most schools of personality theory can claim. And it is not an accident. The tradition's insistence on measurable outcomes is exactly what allowed its treatments to be tested. And then to pass.
Where It Lives
The Tradition Today
So where do behavioral principles actually live today? In behavior therapy, which applies learning principles directly to change behavior. In applied behavior analysis, in schools, clinics and homes. In cognitive-behavioral therapy, where they are combined with work on thought. And in the broader standard of evidence-based practice. The overall assessment is easy to state. The behavioral approach is strong on rigor and on treatment. It is weak on inner experience. And it is in daily clinical use in spite of that weakness, not in ignorance of it.
The Evolution
It Did Not Vanish, It Merged
The most important fact about behaviorism's fate is often stated wrongly. It did not lose an argument and disappear. The tradition evolved rather than vanished. Three steps got it there. The cognitive revolution reopened mental processes as a legitimate object of study. Bandura's social-cognitive theory integrated those processes with learning principles. Combining them, rather than replacing one with the other. And the result was cognitive-behavioral therapy. One of the most widely practiced approaches in psychology today. So behavioral ideas persist across modern psychology, refined, and combined with cognition.
In Practice
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety
Cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxiety shows the merger in a single treatment. It combines behavioral exposure with work on unhelpful thoughts. The behavioral half is graded exposure. Directly descended from conditioning, and from extinction. The cognitive half examines the beliefs that maintain the anxiety. Which is exactly the material Watson ruled out of psychology in nineteen thirteen. And the two halves are not a compromise between rival camps. Each addresses something the other cannot reach. So the tradition lives on in an integrated, evidence-based form. Rather than in its original one.
The Judgement
Holding Both Statements at Once
Which leaves a judgement to make, and it is an uncomfortable one. A theory can be philosophically inadequate and clinically excellent at the same time. Behaviorism is criticised for neglecting cognition, biology and agency. And for leaning heavily on animal research. It also produces some of the most reliable treatments psychology has. Students often want to resolve that tension in one direction. Resist that. The correct answer is that both halves are true. And they are true about different questions. Ask whether it explains what a person is, and the criticisms bite hard. Ask whether it changes what a person does, and the evidence is strong.
Consolidate
What to Take from the Whole Chapter
Three things to carry out of this chapter. Behavioral theory is criticised for neglecting cognition, biology and agency. And for relying on animal studies whose generalization to humans is uncertain. It remains highly relevant through empirically supported therapies. And through its integration into cognitive-behavioral approaches. Step back and the chapter has the shape of a science correcting itself. Watson's rule was too strict. Hull loosened it for drives. Bandura loosened it for attention and memory. And the cognitive revolution completed the repair. The findings survived the rule that produced them. Which is, in the end, the best thing you can say about any scientific programme.
About Psychology of Personality at UPI Study
Psychology of Personality (Psychology 300) is a self-paced online course of 83 video lessons in 13 chapters, from Freud, Adler and Jung to biological, behavioral, cognitive, existential and humanistic theories, traits, personality disorders and culture. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Psychology of Personality with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Psychology of Personality carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Critiques and Contemporary Relevance of Behavioral Personality Theory
What are the main criticisms of behaviorism?
What is the difference between reductionism and determinism in critiques of behaviorism?
Is behavior therapy effective?
How did behaviorism lead to cognitive-behavioral therapy?
About the Psychology of Personality course
How many college credits is Psychology of Personality?
How much does Psychology of Personality cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Psychology of Personality take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Psychology of Personality.
83 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →