UPI Study › Courses › Psychology of Personality › Free lessons › Lesson 3.6 Free with a free account
Melanie Klein's Object Relations Theory and Its Implications
Psychology of Personality · Chapter 3: Psychoanalytic Theories of PersonalitySection 3.6 · lesson 23 of 838 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Psychology of Personality.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Psychology of Personality
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Evaluating the Legacy and Critique of Psychoanalytic Theory →← Erikson's Psychosocial Development: Stages and GrowthNext lesson: Evaluating the Legacy and Critique of Psychoanalytic Theory →
In this lesson
What changes when the raw material of personality is relationships rather than drives.
- Define 'object' in Klein's sense and explain its central role
- Describe the paranoid-schizoid position and the function of splitting
- Explain why the depressive position counts as developmental progress
- State what object relations contributed to later, testable research
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,162 words). Read along, or search it.
Psychoanalytic Theories of Personality
Klein's Object Relations Theory
Freud built personality out of energy. Klein built it out of people. That is the whole substitution, and it changes what the theory can explain. Melanie Klein shifted the focus from instinctual drives to relationships. Specifically, to the infant's earliest bonds with caregivers. This section works through her key terms, which are unusually technical. Objects. Splitting. The paranoid-schizoid and depressive positions. And it ends where the evidence actually sits, which is not with Klein herself. It is with the attachment research her framework helped make possible.
The Relocation
An Object Is a Person, Held Internally
The word object is the first obstacle, so deal with it directly. It does not mean a thing. An object is a person, or a mental representation of a person. Someone toward whom feelings and drives are directed. Klein's claim is that the infant's inner world is populated by these internalised objects. Read plainly, that is a substitution at the base of the theory. Freud's raw material was energy seeking discharge. Klein's raw material is a relationship, taken inside and kept there. Everything else in her system follows from that swap.
Internal World
Early Relationships Become a Template
What does the infant do with these internalised objects? Klein argued they form a template for later social and emotional life. Internalization is the process of taking external relationships into the inner world. The internal world is the resulting landscape of objects and the relations among them. And a whole object is a caregiver experienced as one ambivalently loved person. Hold on to that last term. It is the destination of the whole developmental story. On this view personality is not drive management. It is the elaboration of an inner world. Built from the infant's experience of being cared for, frustrated, and loved.
Positions
Modes, Not Milestones
Klein described two key organisations, and she called them positions. The word choice is deliberate and it matters. These are modes of organising experience, not fixed stages. Compare the two ideas directly. A stage is something you finish. Freud's psychosexual stages are ordered and completed. You do not return to the oral stage. A position is something you can return to. Under enough stress, an adult can reorganise experience the earlier way. That is precisely why the concept has any clinical use with adults. Keep this distinction. It is the most common error students make with this theory.
Splitting
The Paranoid-Schizoid Position
The first position is the paranoid-schizoid position. In it, the infant splits objects into wholly good and wholly bad parts. The classic illustration is the breast. The gratifying breast and the frustrating breast are experienced as two separate things. Not as two states of one caregiver. Why would a mind do that? Because the infant cannot yet tolerate the idea that the same caregiver is both. Splitting manages feeling that would otherwise be overwhelming. So splitting is a solution before it is ever a symptom. It buys tolerable experience at the cost of accuracy. And that trade only becomes a problem when it persists past the point where accuracy is possible.
Integration
The Depressive Position
As development proceeds, the infant enters the depressive position. Here the recognition arrives. The same caregiver is the source of comfort and of frustration. Three things follow from that recognition. First, the split images integrate. Good and bad belong to one whole person. Second, guilt and concern become possible. If the person you attacked in feeling also feeds you, the attack now costs something. Third, reparation appears. The wish to repair perceived damage to a loved object. The name is misleading, so be clear about this. The depressive position is progress. It is a major step toward mature, ambivalent, whole-object relationships. The capacity to love someone you are also angry with, without splitting them in two.
Core Concepts
The Vocabulary in One Place
Six terms carry this theory, so gather them in one place. An object is a person, or an internal representation, toward which drives are aimed. Splitting divides objects into all-good and all-bad parts. The paranoid-schizoid position is the early mode that uses splitting to manage anxiety. The depressive position is the later mode that integrates good and bad into whole objects. Projective identification is projecting parts of the self into another person. And reparation is the wish to repair perceived damage to a loved object. Notice that four of the six describe processes, not structures. This is a theory about what a mind does, not about what it is made of.
Projection Plus
Projective Identification Goes Further Than Projection
Projective identification deserves separating from ordinary projection. Projection attributes your own impulse to someone else. You are angry, and you experience them as the angry one. Projective identification is described as going further than that. A disowned part of the self is put into another person. It is not merely attributed. It is relocated. And the other person is experienced as containing it. The concept is used heavily in clinical work on relational dynamics. It is also where this theory becomes hardest to pin down. A process defined by what one mind puts inside another is exceptionally hard to operationalise. Learn the concept, and hold its measurement status honestly.
Worked Example
Colleagues Who Are Only Ever Allies or Enemies
Here is what splitting looks like when it lasts into adult life. Someone sees colleagues as either perfect allies or total enemies. There is no middle ground available. And a single disappointment moves a person from one category straight to the other. In Klein's terms, that is splitting. The paranoid-schizoid pattern, traced to the earliest organisation of the inner world. What is missing is a depressive-position capacity. Holding good and bad together in one person. Now notice where the theory's practical value actually lies. It is in the question it makes you ask. Not, is this colleague good or bad. But, why can this person only hold one of those at a time. That reframing survives even where the developmental story is contested.
Handle Carefully
Where the Evidence For This Actually Sits
Which brings us to the evidence, and it needs stating carefully. Klein makes detailed claims about the mental life of pre-verbal infants. Those claims are inferred from interpretation, not observed directly. That inference carries the same burden this chapter puts on psychoanalysis generally. Limited samples. And interpretations that can reflect the theorist's assumptions as much as the data. But the lineage her work produced did considerably better. Attachment research operationalised object relations themes. It generated measurable procedures where Klein had offered interpretation. That is where the empirical weight now sits. So the honest summary is a lineage claim, not a validation claim. Klein's ideas were generative. And their most testable descendants are the ones actually carrying the evidence.
Consolidate
From Drives to an Inner Cast of Characters
Pull it together. Klein recentred personality on internalised relationships rather than drives. The paranoid-schizoid position uses splitting to make feeling tolerable. The depressive position integrates good and bad into whole objects. That integration is what makes guilt, concern, and reparation possible. And these internal templates were said to guide emotional life throughout development. The lasting move is the relocation itself. Once personality is built from relationships rather than energy, a new question opens. What actually happens in early caregiving relationships? That question is empirical, and it can be studied. Asking it is what produced attachment theory.
About Psychology of Personality at UPI Study
Psychology of Personality (Psychology 300) is a self-paced online course of 83 video lessons in 13 chapters, from Freud, Adler and Jung to biological, behavioral, cognitive, existential and humanistic theories, traits, personality disorders and culture. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Psychology of Personality with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Psychology of Personality carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Melanie Klein's Object Relations Theory and Its Implications
What does object mean in object relations theory?
What is the paranoid-schizoid position in Melanie Klein's theory?
What is the depressive position, and why is it a sign of progress?
How is projective identification different from projection?
About the Psychology of Personality course
How many college credits is Psychology of Personality?
How much does Psychology of Personality cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Psychology of Personality take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Psychology of Personality.
83 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →