UPI Study › Courses › Psychology of Personality › Free lessons › Lesson 8.6 Free with a free account
Behavioral Perspectives on Personality Differences and Change
Psychology of Personality · Chapter 8: Behavioral and Learning TheoriesSection 8.6 · lesson 51 of 838 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Psychology of Personality.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Psychology of Personality
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Critiques and Contemporary Relevance of Behavioral Personality Theory →← Watson, Hull, and the Methodological Foundations of BehaviorismNext lesson: Critiques and Contemporary Relevance of Behavioral Personality Theory →
In this lesson
If personality is learned, then it varies by setting and it can be rebuilt.
- Explain individual differences as differences in learning history
- Say why the behavioral view predicts variability across situations
- Contrast the trait and behavioral accounts point by point
- Name the techniques that follow from treating behavior as learned
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,059 words). Read along, or search it.
Behavioral and Learning Theories
Differences, Situations, and Change
Two people face the same situation and behave completely differently. The usual explanation says they have different personalities. The behavioral tradition says something more specific, and more demanding. They have different learning histories. That reframing has two consequences worth following carefully. It predicts that behavior should vary by setting more than we usually assume. And it predicts that personality can be changed, deliberately and measurably. This section works through both, and states plainly where the optimism runs out.
The Claim
Differences in History, Not in Essence
From a behavioral perspective, personality differences reflect differences in learning history. Rather than fixed inner traits. The reasoning is simple, and it is worth walking through. Each person encounters a unique pattern of stimuli, reinforcements, and models. No two histories are identical, even between siblings in one house. So each person develops a distinctive repertoire of behaviors. And what looks like a stable trait is, on this view, something narrower. A consistent set of responses, learned in similar situations. Notice that the stability itself is not being denied. Its location is what is in dispute.
The Vocabulary
Four Terms That Do the Work
Four terms carry the argument in this section. Learning history is the accumulated experience that shapes a person's behavior. A repertoire is the set of behaviors an individual has actually learned. A contingency is the relationship between a behavior and its consequences. And a reinforcement contingency is the specific rule linking a behavior to its reinforcement. Contingency is the load-bearing term here. It names the rule that the environment is currently running. Change the rule, on this account, and you change the behavior the rule was maintaining. That is the practical hinge of the entire section.
The Prediction
Behavior Should Vary More Than Traits Predict
This emphasis leads to a testable prediction, and it is a bold one. Behaviorists expect behavior to vary across contexts. More than trait theories predict. Take an ordinary observation. Someone is outgoing among friends and reserved at work. The trait account has to treat that as noise around a true underlying level. The behavioral account treats it as the expected result. Different settings carry different reinforcement contingencies. So the person is not being inconsistent, and not hiding a truer self. This is a genuine empirical disagreement, not a difference of emphasis. The two accounts predict different amounts of cross-situational consistency.
Side by Side
Two Accounts of the Same Person
Set the two accounts against each other, point by point. On the source of differences, the trait view says inner stable traits. The behavioral view says learning history. On consistency, the trait view expects it to be high across situations. The behavioral view expects it to vary by context. On capacity for change, the trait view is limited. The behavioral view is high and ongoing. On what to study, the trait view looks at hidden dispositions. The behavioral view looks at observable behavior. And on method of change, the trait tradition works through insight. The behavioral tradition works by altering contingencies. That last row is where the disagreement stops being academic.
The Consequence
Why This View Is Optimistic
A major appeal of the behavioral approach is its optimism about change. And the argument for it is short. If behavior is learned, then it was installed by a history of experience. It was not built in at the factory. Then it can be unlearned, and relearned. The same processes that installed it can weaken it, and install something else. So by altering the contingencies of reinforcement, people acquire new patterns of behavior. More adaptive ones, meaning behavior that helps a person function effectively. That premise underlies behavior therapy. It also underlies a great many self-improvement programmes that never mention Skinner.
The Methods
Four Ways to Change a Repertoire
The techniques that follow are unglamorous and specific. Reinforce the desired behavior, so that it becomes more frequent. Withdraw reinforcement from unwanted behavior. Model new responses, so a behavior can be acquired by observation. And shape complex skills gradually, through successive approximations. Now notice what is absent from that list. None of these requires insight into oneself. The trait tradition changes people by helping them understand who they are. The behavioral tradition changes them by changing what the environment rewards. Those are not two routes to the same destination. They are different theories of what needs fixing.
The Discipline
Progress You Can Actually Check
There is a methodological benefit that follows from all this. These methods target observable behavior and measurable outcomes. So progress can be tracked objectively, and the intervention adjusted as needed. Measurability is not a stylistic preference here. It is what lets an intervention be corrected while it is still running. A method whose progress cannot be checked cannot be adjusted mid-course. But this cuts the other way too, and that is worth saying. If the target behavior does not move, the intervention has visibly failed. There is nowhere for it to hide.
In Practice
The Fear of Public Speaking
Consider someone who fears public speaking. The behavioral route is gradual exposure, with reinforcement for each small success. The steps are deliberately small enough that each one can actually succeed. Each success is reinforced, and only then is the next step set slightly higher. Confidence and fluency get built, rather than discovered. And this shows how behavioral methods produce measurable, personality-relevant change. Notice one thing the procedure never does. It never asks where the fear originally came from. For this tradition, that question is not required in order to fix the problem.
The Honest Limit
Optimism Is a Prediction, Not a Guarantee
It would be misleading to leave the optimism unqualified. The claim is that behavior can be changed. Not that it changes easily. A long learning history has installed a repertoire over years. And altering the contingencies means altering an environment that is still running. Often an environment that is still reinforcing the old pattern every day. The behavioral account also stays deliberately silent on some things. Why the person feels as they do. What the behavior means to them. Those are not oversights. They are consequences of the founding rule about evidence. The next section takes that objection seriously. And asks what this tradition can and cannot answer.
Consolidate
Three Claims, One Consequence
Three claims, and one consequence that follows from all of them. First, differences come from learning history. Unique patterns of stimuli, reinforcement, and models produce distinctive repertoires. Second, behavior varies by situation. Different settings carry different contingencies, so consistency is lower than trait theory expects. Third, behavior that was learned can be relearned. Through altered contingencies, modeling, and shaping. And the consequence is that this tradition grounds behavior therapy. Treatment that applies learning principles follows from the account of personality itself. Rather than being bolted on to it afterwards.
About Psychology of Personality at UPI Study
Psychology of Personality (Psychology 300) is a self-paced online course of 83 video lessons in 13 chapters, from Freud, Adler and Jung to biological, behavioral, cognitive, existential and humanistic theories, traits, personality disorders and culture. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Psychology of Personality with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Psychology of Personality carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Behavioral Perspectives on Personality Differences and Change
Why do people develop different personalities according to behaviorism?
Why does behavior change across situations according to behaviorists?
Can personality change according to behavioral theory?
How would a behaviorist treat a fear of public speaking?
About the Psychology of Personality course
How many college credits is Psychology of Personality?
How much does Psychology of Personality cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Psychology of Personality take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Psychology of Personality.
83 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →