UPI Study › Courses › Psychology of Personality › Free lessons › Lesson 12.5 Free with a free account
Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Humanistic Theory and Application
Psychology of Personality · Chapter 12: Humanistic Psychology: Applications and CritiquesSection 12.5 · lesson 76 of 83video coming soon
← Humanistic Psychology in Contemporary Therapeutic PracticeNext lesson: Trait Perspective: Definitions, Foundations, and Gordon Allport's Theory →
In this lesson
Which parts travel, which parts need rebuilding, and how to tell them apart.
- Explain the individualist assumptions built into the theory
- Contrast individualist and collectivist views of the self
- Identify problems that arise in cross-cultural application
- Describe how self-actualization can be redefined
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (859 words). Read along, or search it.
Humanistic Psychology: Applications and Critiques
Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Humanistic Theory and Application
A client comes from a family where obligation to elders is not negotiable. The therapy manual asks them to prioritise their personal needs. And to disclose openly. Nothing has been done wrong technically. The technique still misfires. This section is about why that happens. Which humanistic ideas are culturally located. And which ones genuinely travel.
The Origin
A Theory Built in One Kind of Society
Humanistic psychology developed largely within Western, individualistic societies. And its central ideals reflect that origin. Consider four of them. Self-actualization. Autonomy. Personal growth. And self-disclosure. Each of those carries two assumptions underneath it. First, that the individual self is the primary unit of meaning. And second, that fulfilling one's unique potential is a paramount goal. Neither assumption is announced. Both are built in.
The Contrast
Where Identity Is Defined Relationally
In many collectivist cultures, the picture is different. Identity is defined more through relationships, through family, and through community. And harmony, or duty, may take priority over individual self-expression. Which raises the question this section exists to ask. Are humanistic ideals universal? Or do they privilege a particular cultural worldview? Some of it is parochial. Some of it plainly is not. That is not a rhetorical question with an obvious answer. Different parts of the theory come out of it very differently.
Five Dimensions
Where the Emphases Diverge
Five dimensions show where the emphases diverge. On the self, one emphasis is independent and unique. The other is interdependent and relational. On goals, one is personal self-actualization. The other is group harmony, and duty. On disclosure, one values open self-expression. The other values modesty, and restraint. On autonomy, one holds it as highly valued. The other balances it with obligation. And on fulfilment, one looks to individual potential. The other to collective well-being. Both columns describe flourishing. They disagree about its shape. Read the right-hand column carefully. It is not a deficit version of the left-hand one. It is a different account of what a good life actually is.
In the Room
Where Technique Starts to Misfire
Applying humanistic therapy across cultures therefore requires sensitivity. And the failures are specific, rather than vague. A strong emphasis on self-disclosure may feel inappropriate. So may an emphasis on prioritising personal needs. To clients from cultures that value modesty, or interdependence. Or deference to elders. Notice exactly what goes wrong in that situation. The technique is delivered precisely as trained. And it still lands as a demand the client has good reason to refuse.
The Requirement
Adapt the Frame, Not Just the Manner
So practitioners must adapt techniques. So that growth is understood in terms that fit the client's own cultural framework. That is more than being polite about difference. It means the content of the goal changes. What counts as growth, for this client, in their own terms. Otherwise the therapist is offering respect and a foreign goal at once. Two terms are useful here. Cultural responsiveness means adapting practice to a client's culture. Cultural relativism means judging values within their cultural context.
What Travels
The Relational Core Transfers Well
At the same time, a great deal of the approach travels perfectly well. Many humanistic values translate across cultures. Respect for the person. Empathy. And genuine acceptance. These can strengthen the therapeutic relationship anywhere. Which sharpens the criticism, rather than dissolving it. The claim is not that the whole approach is culturally parochial. It is that its ideals of the self are. While its relational conditions are not.
The Split
Two Layers, Two Verdicts
That gives two layers, with two different verdicts. The portable layer is empathy, respect, and genuine acceptance. These describe how one person meets another. They do not specify what a good life contains. The layer needing rebuilding is self-actualization, autonomy, and self-disclosure. These do specify what a good life contains. And they specify it in the terms of one cultural worldview. That gives a useful diagnostic to carry around. A concept travels when it describes how to relate. It needs adaptation when it prescribes what to want.
Redefinition
Self-Actualization in Relational Terms
So a culturally responsive humanistic practice keeps the relational strengths. While redefining concepts like self-actualization. To include collective and relational forms of fulfilment. And the concept survives that rewrite. A therapist working with a client from a collectivist background might frame growth differently. Not as asserting independence from family. But as finding a fulfilling role within it. The family is the setting for the growth, rather than the obstacle to it. That is still self-actualization in the general sense. Realising potential. What has changed is the shape a realised life is assumed to take.
Terms
The Vocabulary of This Debate
A short vocabulary for this debate. Individualism is a cultural emphasis on the independent self. Collectivism is a cultural emphasis on group and relationships. Interdependence means identity defined through relationships. Universalism is the claim that values apply across all cultures. And a worldview is a culture's shared framework of meaning. Universalism is the term to watch. It names the claim the cross-cultural critique is contesting.
Consolidate
Why It Does Not Transfer, and What to Do
Two questions to close the chapter. Why might humanistic ideals not transfer directly across cultures? Because they assume an individualist view of the self. One that differs from collectivist values. And how can practice adapt? By redefining growth in relational terms. While preserving empathy, and respect. The honest summary is neither a dismissal nor a defence. Humanistic ideals reflect a worldview. Some of what was built on them is worth keeping everywhere. Knowing which is which is the practitioner's job.
About Psychology of Personality at UPI Study
Psychology of Personality (Psychology 300) is a self-paced online course of 83 video lessons in 13 chapters, from Freud, Adler and Jung to biological, behavioral, cognitive, existential and humanistic theories, traits, personality disorders and culture. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Psychology of Personality with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Psychology of Personality carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Humanistic Theory and Application
Are the ideals of humanistic psychology universal across cultures?
Why might self-disclosure in therapy not suit clients from collectivist cultures?
Which parts of humanistic therapy work across cultures?
How can self-actualization be adapted for collectivist clients?
About the Psychology of Personality course
How many college credits is Psychology of Personality?
How much does Psychology of Personality cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Psychology of Personality take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Psychology of Personality.
83 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →