Nomothetic and Idiographic Analyses of Personality Traits

UPI Study › Courses › Psychology of Personality › Free lessons › Lesson 2.6 Free with a free account

Nomothetic and Idiographic Analyses of Personality Traits

Psychology of Personality · Chapter 2: Methods and Ethics in Personality ResearchSection 2.6 · lesson 11 of 838 min · free with a free account

← Projective Tests: Thematic Apperception Test and Related MethodsNext lesson: Genetics, Environment, and Type A/B Personality Interactions →

Earn 3 college credits for Psychology of PersonalityRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Psychology 300 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Psychology of Personality · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

Where a person stands, and what standing there means for them.

  • State the goal and data of the nomothetic approach
  • State the goal and data of the idiographic approach
  • Explain what averaging across people conceals
  • Combine the two in a single assessment

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,038 words). Read along, or search it.

Methods and Ethics in Personality Research

Nomothetic and Idiographic Analyses of Personality Traits

A client scores in the top ten per cent for neuroticism. What have you learned? You have learned where she stands. You have not learned what she is worried about. Those are two different questions, and personality research has two traditions for them. This section covers the nomothetic approach, which pursues general laws across people. And the idiographic approach, which studies one individual in depth. We will look at what averaging across people conceals. And how a practitioner combines the two without confusing them.

General Laws

Comparing Everyone on the Same Ruler

The nomothetic approach seeks general laws of personality that apply across people. It identifies common dimensions, such as the Big Five. Dimensions on which everyone can be placed and compared. It relies on group data. Statistical analysis. And standardised measures. Its goal is to discover regularities that hold broadly. Regularities that enable prediction and comparison across large populations. And that is something no single case can ever provide. One person cannot tell you what is typical, because there is nothing to be typical of. The comparison group is not a detail of the method. It is the method.

What It Buys

Normative Comparison

This approach underlies most quantitative personality research. By locating individuals on shared dimensions, it supports normative comparison. Which lets a researcher say how a person stands relative to others. That sentence is only possible because everyone was placed on the same scale. Remove the shared dimension and the comparison has nothing to mean. So its strength is generalisability. A finding established this way is a claim about people. Not a claim about the one person who happened to be studied. Which is why the sample matters so much, and why unrepresentative samples do so much damage.

What It Costs

The Average Person Does Not Exist

Now the cost, which is more interesting than it first sounds. Averaging across people can obscure the distinctive organisation of any single individual's personality. Consider two people with identical scores on all five dimensions. They can still be organised quite differently. Because a score records the level of a trait. It does not record how the parts fit together in that particular person. And notice that the information is not corrupted here. It is discarded by design. Aggregation removes what is particular to each person. That removal is exactly how it manages to produce a general law. So this limitation is not a flaw to be fixed within the method. It is the price the method charges for what it delivers.

One Person

The Idiographic Question

The idiographic approach focuses on the individual in depth. It seeks to understand the unique pattern and meaning of one person's traits. Rather than placing them on universal scales. It is tempting to hear that as a softer, less rigorous version of the same enterprise. It is not. It is a different question altogether. Not, how does this person compare with others. But, how is this person organised, and what do these characteristics mean in this life? Those two questions can have very different answers for the same person.

Its Materials

Cases, Narratives, Personal Documents

The idiographic approach draws on different materials, and that follows from its question. Case studies. In-depth analysis of a single individual. Narratives. How the person accounts for their own life. And personal documents. A diary, for example. These capture how characteristics combine in a particular life. Including qualities that may not map neatly onto common dimensions. That last clause deserves weight. An instrument can only return what it was built to ask about. Anything outside its item pool is invisible to it. Invisible to the instrument is not the same as absent from the person.

Compared

Different Goals, Different Failure Modes

Set the two approaches side by side across five features. Goal. General laws, versus individual understanding. Data. Large samples, versus a single case. Methods. Statistics and scales, versus narrative and case study. Strength. Generalisable, versus rich and contextual. And limitation. Misses uniqueness, versus hard to generalise. Look carefully at those last two entries. They are mirror images of one another. Each approach is weak exactly where the other is strong. Which is the structural reason for combining them, rather than choosing.

Not Rivals

They Are Not Answering the Same Question

The two approaches are complementary rather than rival, and the reason is precise. The first asks how people compare on shared dimensions. The second asks how one person is uniquely organised. So a debate about which one is correct is a category error. Neither can answer the other's question. So neither can defeat the other. Nomothetic methods establish the general framework. Idiographic methods illuminate how that framework is expressed in a unique person. Keep both, because generalisation and individual meaning are genuinely distinct goals. And applied work usually needs both of them within the same hour.

In Practice

Locate, Then Interpret

In practice, integration has a shape. Locate, then interpret. First, locate the person on common dimensions. Standardised scores establish where they stand relative to others. Second, interpret those scores in context. Individualised analysis asks what this standing means in this life. And then move between the two, because understanding rarely stays in one mode. The common professional failure is skipping the second step. A score gets delivered as though it were a conclusion. But a score is a location. And a location is not yet an explanation of anything.

Case

High Neuroticism, and Then What?

Here is the integration in a single case. A counsellor first uses Big Five scores, which is the nomothetic step. And sees that a client is high in neuroticism. Then she explores the client's personal history. Looking for the specific worries that give that score its meaning. That is the idiographic step, and it is where the work actually happens. The number told her where to look. It did not tell her what she would find there. Two clients with the same elevated score can need entirely different conversations. The score does not distinguish between them. The history does.

Consolidate

A Location and a Meaning

So the combination is straightforward to state. Locate a person on common dimensions. Then interpret those scores through detailed, individualised analysis. Consider what each half is missing without the other. Nomothetic without idiographic gives you a precise position, and no understanding of it. Idiographic without nomothetic gives you understanding you cannot check against anyone else. The habit worth building is small, and it prevents most of the confusion. Notice which of the two questions you are currently answering. Most muddled assessments come from answering one question, and reporting the other.

About Psychology of Personality at UPI Study

Psychology of Personality (Psychology 300) is a self-paced online course of 83 video lessons in 13 chapters, from Freud, Adler and Jung to biological, behavioral, cognitive, existential and humanistic theories, traits, personality disorders and culture. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →

Compare: Abnormal Psychology vs Psychology of Personality

Why take it here

Why students take Psychology of Personality with UPI Study

What makes each person who they arePsychology of Personality compares the major explanations of why people differ: psychoanalytic and neo-analytic theories, biology and evolution, learning, cognition, existential and humanistic views, and trait models, plus how personality is measured and studied. It is a common course in psychology degrees.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Psychology of Personality carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Nomothetic and Idiographic Analyses of Personality Traits

What is the nomothetic approach to personality?
The nomothetic approach seeks general laws of personality that apply across people. It places everyone on common dimensions, such as the Big Five, using group data, statistical analysis, and standardized measures, which allows prediction and comparison across large populations. Its strength is generalizability, since it can say how a person stands relative to others. Its cost is that averaging across people discards how traits are uniquely organized within any one individual.
What is the idiographic approach in personality psychology?
The idiographic approach studies one individual in depth to understand the unique pattern and meaning of that person's traits. Rather than asking how someone compares with others, it asks how this person is organized and what their characteristics mean in their life. It relies on case studies, personal narratives, and documents such as diaries, which can capture qualities that do not fit neatly onto standard dimensions. Its main limitation is that findings are hard to generalize.
Can two people with the same Big Five scores have different personalities?
Yes. Two people with identical scores on all five dimensions can be organized quite differently, because a score records the level of a trait, not how a person's traits fit together in their life. Averaging across people removes what is particular to each individual by design; that is how general laws are produced. Idiographic methods, such as case studies and personal narratives, recover that individual organization and the meaning a trait has for that person.
How do psychologists combine nomothetic and idiographic methods?
They first locate a person on common dimensions with standardized scores, then interpret those scores through individualized analysis of that person's life. For example, a counselor may see from Big Five scores that a client is high in neuroticism, then explore the client's history to find the specific worries behind the score. A score is a location, not an explanation, and two clients with the same elevated score may need entirely different conversations.

About the Psychology of Personality course

How many college credits is Psychology of Personality?
Psychology of Personality (Psychology 300) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Psychology of Personality cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 83 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Psychology of Personality take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 83 lessons total about 8 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Psychology of Personality.

83 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Psychology of Personality →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Psychology of Personality
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →