UPI Study › Courses › Psychology of Personality › Free lessons › Lesson 12.3 Free with a free account
Critiques of Humanistic Psychology: Limitations and Counterarguments
Psychology of Personality · Chapter 12: Humanistic Psychology: Applications and CritiquesSection 12.3 · lesson 74 of 83video coming soon
← The Five-Factor Model of Dispositional Traits: Overview and RelevanceNext lesson: Humanistic Psychology in Contemporary Therapeutic Practice →
In this lesson
Four serious charges, and the defence that actually answers one of them.
- State the main empirical critique
- Explain the charge of excessive optimism
- Describe the cultural narrowness objection
- Weigh the counterarguments defenders offer
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (844 words). Read along, or search it.
Humanistic Psychology: Applications and Critiques
Critiques of Humanistic Psychology and the Counterarguments
Humanistic psychology faces four serious criticisms. Its defenders have an answer to each of them. But the answers are not equally strong, and that is the interesting part. Three of them argue about what psychology should value. One of them produces evidence. This section works through both sides. And asks which parts of the defence actually hold.
The Main Charge
Limited Empirical Rigour
The approach has been praised for restoring attention to the whole person. It also faces serious critiques. The most common one is methodological. Concepts such as self-actualization are difficult to define precisely. So is the fully functioning person. And both are difficult to measure objectively. Which makes systematic testing challenging. The technical name for the missing step is operationalization. That means defining a concept in measurable terms. Until that is done, there is nothing for evidence to bear on.
Second Charge
Overly Optimistic About Human Nature
The second charge is about the approach's view of human nature. Critics say it is overly optimistic. And they name three things it pays too little attention to. Destructive behaviour. Situational pressures. And unconscious processes. This is not a complaint about tone, or about being too cheerful. Each of those three is a well-studied source of human behaviour. A model that underweights them will systematically mispredict. And it will mispredict precisely in the situations where they dominate.
Third Charge
Cultural Values Presented as Universal Truths
The third charge concerns culture. The approach places strong emphasis on individual growth, and self-direction. Critics describe that as reflecting particular cultural values. Rather than universal truths about personality. The force of the objection is about status, not about content. It does not claim self-direction is unimportant. It claims a culturally located ideal has been presented as a finding about human nature. Those are very different things to assert.
The Trade-Off
Where the Approach Actually Sits
It helps to see the trade-off spatially. Humanistic theory scores high on attention to meaning, and to the whole person. And it scores lower on empirical testability. The Five-Factor Model, covered in the previous section, trades the opposite way. Strong on measurement. Much narrower in what it attempts to describe. Neither position is simply better than the other. But knowing where a theory sits tells you what to ask of it.
Defence One
Hard to Measure Is Not the Same as Unimportant
Defenders of humanistic psychology offer several responses. The first concerns what measurement difficulty actually establishes. They argue that the difficulty of measuring subjective experience does not make it unimportant. And that strictly objective methods can miss something. Precisely what matters most about being human. On this account, the approach deliberately values depth and meaning. Over narrow quantification. So the trade was made knowingly. It was not an oversight.
Assess It
How Far That Defence Goes
Take that first counterargument seriously. And take it precisely. What it establishes is real. Importance and measurability are different properties. A hard-to-measure thing can still matter enormously. But notice what it leaves entirely open. Whether the specific claims are true. Saying that a topic matters is not evidence about any particular assertion regarding it. Which is why the second defence carries more weight. It does not argue about what evidence is for. It produces some.
Defence Two
The Concrete Contributions
Supporters point to two concrete contributions. The first is client-centered therapy. There is substantial evidence behind its core conditions. Empathy. And unconditional positive regard. The second is positive psychology. The humanistic movement helped inspire it. And positive psychology studies well-being with rigorous methods. The conclusion drawn from those two is carefully worded. On this view, humanistic ideas have been refined and partly validated. Rather than refuted.
The Test Case
Empathy and Genuineness
The strongest single piece of evidence is worth isolating. There is strong research support for therapist empathy. And for genuineness, in client-centered therapy. That is cited for a specific reason. It shows that the concepts are not all untestable. Despite the measurement challenges, some humanistic ideas can be tested and validated. And those particular ones were. But be clear about what that does and does not settle. The core conditions have survived testing. Self-actualization has not been through the same process. The defence is strongest exactly where the concepts got specific.
Consolidate
Critique and Response, Side by Side
Set the critiques and responses side by side. Concepts are hard to measure. The response is that subjective experience still matters. The approach is overly optimistic. The response is that it highlights neglected human strengths. It ignores the unconscious. The response is that it focuses on conscious meaning and choice. It is culturally narrow. The response is that it is adaptable to diverse contexts. And it has a weak empirical base. The response is that core therapy conditions are supported. Read that third row as a reframe rather than a rebuttal. It concedes the scope limit, and defends it as a deliberate choice. Which is a different kind of answer from the last row.
The Verdict
What the Two Questions Come To
Two questions to close on. Why is humanistic psychology criticised as hard to test? Because its central concepts resist precise definition, and precise measurement. And how do defenders respond? By arguing that meaning and experience matter, even when hard to quantify. And that key therapeutic conditions are empirically supported. Those two answers are not equal in strength, and it is worth saying so. The first is a claim about what psychology should value. The second is evidence.
About Psychology of Personality at UPI Study
Psychology of Personality (Psychology 300) is a self-paced online course of 83 video lessons in 13 chapters, from Freud, Adler and Jung to biological, behavioral, cognitive, existential and humanistic theories, traits, personality disorders and culture. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Psychology of Personality with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Psychology of Personality carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Critiques of Humanistic Psychology: Limitations and Counterarguments
What are the main criticisms of humanistic psychology?
What is operationalization, and why is it a problem for humanistic psychology?
How do supporters defend humanistic psychology against claims it is unscientific?
Is there research evidence supporting humanistic psychology?
About the Psychology of Personality course
How many college credits is Psychology of Personality?
How much does Psychology of Personality cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Psychology of Personality take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Psychology of Personality.
83 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →