Designing Personality Research: Basic, Applied, and Ethical Considerations

UPI Study › Courses › Psychology of Personality › Free lessons › Lesson 2.1 Free with a free account

Designing Personality Research: Basic, Applied, and Ethical Considerations

Psychology of Personality · Chapter 2: Methods and Ethics in Personality ResearchSection 2.1 · lesson 6 of 839 min · free with a free account

← Comparative Analysis of Major Personality TheoriesNext lesson: Bias, Practical Application, and Research Integrity in Personality Studies →

Earn 3 college credits for Psychology of PersonalityRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Psychology 300 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Psychology of Personality · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

The design you choose fixes the ceiling on what your data can ever prove.

  • Match a research question to a design that can answer it
  • Explain why correlation cannot carry a causal claim
  • Distinguish basic from applied research aims
  • Build ethical safeguards in from the start, not the end

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,165 words). Read along, or search it.

Methods and Ethics in Personality Research

Designing Personality Research

Most weak studies are not ruined during analysis. They were ruined before the first response came in. The design was chosen badly, and no statistical work afterwards can repair that. This section is about choosing a structure that can actually answer your question. We will compare five designs, and name what each one gives up. We will look at why a correlation cannot carry a causal claim, however strong it is. We will separate basic research from applied research, and see how they feed each other. And we will treat the ethical safeguards as design decisions, because that is what they are.

The Constraint

Analysis Cannot Rescue a Design

Designing personality research begins with matching a question to a structure capable of answering it. That sounds obvious. It is also routinely got wrong. Researchers select among experimental, correlational, longitudinal, cross-sectional and case-study designs. Each has distinct strengths, and distinct limitations. The key principle is this. The validity of any conclusion is constrained by the design chosen. Causal claims require designs that rule out alternative explanations. Not merely strong correlations, however strong they happen to be. Which is why the design decision is not a formality at the start of a project. It sets a ceiling. And no amount of later statistical work can lift it.

Five Designs

Each Buys Something and Gives Something Up

Take the five designs in turn, with what each buys and what it costs. Experimental designs manipulate a variable. The limitation is artificial settings. Correlational designs measure associations. The limitation is that no causal claim follows. Longitudinal designs track change over time. They are costly, and they lose participants to attrition. Cross-sectional designs compare groups at once. They are vulnerable to cohort confounds. That is, differences between age groups that come from their era, not their age. And case studies give a deep single-subject view, with low generalisability. Read the limitation column as the price of the feature beside it. There is no row here where that column is empty.

The Core Pair

Manipulate, or Merely Observe

The central pair is experimental versus correlational, so take those more slowly. Experimental designs manipulate a variable to establish cause and effect. The manipulation is what licenses the causal language. Nothing else does. The price is that the setting is often artificial, which limits how far the finding travels. Correlational designs measure naturally occurring associations between traits and outcomes. Without manipulation. So they are realistic, and they cannot settle direction. Now here is a constraint specific to this field. Much personality research is necessarily correlational. You cannot randomly assign a person to be conscientious. That is a genuine limit on what the field can claim, and it is worth stating out loud.

The Trap

Conscientiousness Predicts Success. And Then What?

Consider a real finding. Conscientiousness predicts academic success. It is tempting to move straight to advice. Become more conscientious and you will do better. But that correlational finding cannot, by itself, demonstrate that conscientiousness causes the success. Because unmeasured variables may drive both. Something not in the dataset at all could produce the trait score, and the outcome, independently. And here is what makes this dangerous rather than merely technical. The correlation looks exactly the same either way. There is no signal in the number telling you which situation you are in. So the fix has to happen before data collection, not after. Sound design anticipates rival explanations. And builds in controls, comparison groups, and measurement strategies that reduce ambiguity in advance.

The Sequence

Four Decisions Before a Single Response

In practice, that means four decisions before a single response is collected. First, state the question. What exactly is being claimed? Second, name the threats. Which rival explanations could produce this result? Third, choose the structure that controls those particular threats. Fourth, build in the controls. Comparison groups, and measurement strategies. Only then does data collection begin. The order is the whole point. Each step is answering the one before it. Skip the second step, and the third becomes a matter of habit rather than reasoning.

Two Modes

Basic and Applied Are Not Opposed

Studies also differ in what they are for, and it pays to know which kind you are reading. Basic research aims to expand theoretical understanding of personality. Clarifying how traits are organised, for example. Applied research uses that knowledge to address practical problems. In clinical, organisational, or educational settings. The two are interdependent, and the dependency runs both ways. Applied work draws on theory, which is the obvious direction. And field problems frequently reshape theoretical models, which is the direction people forget. Recognising which mode a study occupies clarifies how its findings should be interpreted. And how far they should be generalised. A finding built for one purpose travels badly into the other.

Not An Afterthought

Four Safeguards Designed In From Inception

Ethical considerations are foundational, rather than procedural afterthoughts. Four safeguards must be designed into a study from its inception. Informed consent. Voluntary agreement to participate, after disclosure of the risks. Protection from harm. Confidentiality of participants' identifying information. And the right to withdraw, at any point. The phrase from its inception is doing real work in that sentence. Retrofitted consent is not consent. And anonymising a dataset afterwards does not undo a disclosure that already happened. These are structural properties of a study, like the design itself.

Sensitive Ground

Personality Research Asks Costly Questions

There is a reason this matters particularly in personality research. The field probes areas that are not neutral to be asked about. Anxiety. Aggression. Self-concept. A questionnaire item can be an intrusion, even when nothing goes wrong. So researchers weigh the scientific value of a study against any burden it places on participants. That judgement is explicit and comparative, not a box to be ticked. And it is made before proceeding, through independent ethical review. Independent is the operative word there. Ethical review is where someone outside the project asks whether the burden was honestly estimated. Which is very difficult to do from inside your own study, however careful you are.

Case

Does the Resilience Workshop Actually Work?

Put the whole thing together with an ordinary applied question. A workplace consultant wants to know whether a resilience workshop reduces burnout. The tempting design is simple. Run the workshop, measure burnout before and after. And that design cannot separate the workshop from the people who signed up for it. Employees who volunteer for resilience training may differ in motivation from those who do not. Motivation alone could produce the improvement. So the consultant uses a randomised controlled design instead. Assigning employees either to the training, or to a waitlist group. Now observed differences can be attributed to the intervention. Rather than to pre-existing motivation, which randomisation has spread across both groups.

Consolidate

Decide What You Could Prove Before You Try

The rule to take from this section is short. Match the design to the question, because the design fixes the ceiling on the claim. State the hypothesis. Identify the threats to validity. Select the structure that controls those threats. Then collect a single response. And notice how this kind of study fails, when it fails. Not loudly. A badly designed study still produces clean numbers. A readable table, a plausible discussion section, and a claim the data never licensed. The same discipline governs the ethics. Consent and causal inference are both structural properties of a design. Neither one can be added at the end.

About Psychology of Personality at UPI Study

Psychology of Personality (Psychology 300) is a self-paced online course of 83 video lessons in 13 chapters, from Freud, Adler and Jung to biological, behavioral, cognitive, existential and humanistic theories, traits, personality disorders and culture. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →

Compare: Abnormal Psychology vs Psychology of Personality

Why take it here

Why students take Psychology of Personality with UPI Study

What makes each person who they arePsychology of Personality compares the major explanations of why people differ: psychoanalytic and neo-analytic theories, biology and evolution, learning, cognition, existential and humanistic views, and trait models, plus how personality is measured and studied. It is a common course in psychology degrees.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Psychology of Personality carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Designing Personality Research: Basic, Applied, and Ethical Considerations

What research designs are used in personality psychology?
The main designs are experimental, correlational, longitudinal, cross-sectional, and case study, and each trades a strength for a limitation. Experiments manipulate a variable but often use artificial settings. Correlational studies measure natural associations but cannot show cause. Longitudinal studies track change over time but are costly and lose participants to attrition. Cross-sectional studies compare groups at one time but face cohort confounds. Case studies give deep detail about one person but generalize poorly.
Why can't correlational personality research prove causation?
Correlational research cannot prove causation because it measures naturally occurring associations without manipulating anything, so unmeasured variables may drive both the trait and the outcome. For example, conscientiousness predicts academic success, but that finding alone does not show conscientiousness causes it. Much personality research has to be correlational, because people cannot be randomly assigned to a trait. Good designs therefore anticipate rival explanations in advance with controls, comparison groups, and careful measurement.
What is the difference between basic and applied research in personality psychology?
Basic research aims to expand theoretical understanding, such as clarifying how traits are organized, while applied research uses that knowledge to solve practical problems in clinical, organizational, or educational settings. The two depend on each other: applied work draws on theory, and problems found in the field often reshape theoretical models. Knowing which kind a study is helps readers judge how its findings should be interpreted and how far they can be generalized.
Why use random assignment in a study of a personality intervention?
Random assignment spreads pre-existing differences, such as motivation, across groups, so differences in outcomes can be attributed to the intervention. If only volunteers attend a resilience workshop, a later drop in burnout might reflect their higher motivation rather than the training. Randomly assigning employees either to the workshop or to a waitlist control group rules out that rival explanation, which simply measuring participants before and after the workshop cannot do.

About the Psychology of Personality course

How many college credits is Psychology of Personality?
Psychology of Personality (Psychology 300) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Psychology of Personality cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 83 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Psychology of Personality take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 83 lessons total about 8 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Psychology of Personality.

83 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Psychology of Personality →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Psychology of Personality
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →