Ethical Frameworks Governing Personality Testing and Assessment

UPI Study › Courses › Psychology of Personality › Free lessons › Lesson 2.8 Free with a free account

Ethical Frameworks Governing Personality Testing and Assessment

Psychology of Personality · Chapter 2: Methods and Ethics in Personality ResearchSection 2.8 · lesson 13 of 838 min · free with a free account

← Genetics, Environment, and Type A/B Personality InteractionsNext lesson: Affective Communication and Charisma in Personality Evaluation →

Earn 3 college credits for Psychology of PersonalityRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Psychology 300 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Psychology of Personality · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

Sometimes the ethical answer is that this test should not be used at all.

  • List the core principles underlying ethical testing
  • Explain why a misnormed instrument is an ethical problem
  • State the examiner's obligations in administration and reporting
  • Recognise when declining to test is the right decision

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,036 words). Read along, or search it.

Methods and Ethics in Personality Research

Ethical Frameworks Governing Personality Testing and Assessment

Most discussions of testing ethics end with a list of things you should do. This one includes something you sometimes have to refuse to do. Because the ethical answer, occasionally, is that this test should not be used at all. We will cover the principles underneath professional testing standards. The concrete obligations each principle produces. Why an instrument used on the wrong population is an ethical problem, not just a technical one. And how results should be communicated when the person receiving them wants more certainty than exists.

The Principles

Four Commitments Underneath Every Rule

Ethical frameworks for personality testing rest on a small set of core principles. Beneficence, and the avoidance of harm. Respect for autonomy. The person's right to make informed choices about being assessed. Fairness, which in testing means the instrument must be valid for the population it is used on. And integrity. Honesty about what the assessment can and cannot establish. These are not sentiments to be nodded at. Each translates into a concrete obligation. One that can be checked, documented, and pointed at when it is missing.

The Obligations

What the Principles Require in Practice

Picture the obligations arranged around the practice they govern. Informed consent. Confidentiality. Validity for the intended use. Competent interpretation. And test security. None of them substitutes for another, which is worth stating. Impeccable consent procedures do not repair an invalid instrument. And a well-validated test used without consent is still an ethical failure. They have to hold together, or the assessment is not defensible.

Specifics

Each Obligation Names Something Checkable

Take the obligations one at a time, because each names something checkable. Obtaining informed consent. Agreement to participate after full disclosure. Protecting the confidentiality of assessment information. Ensuring instruments are valid for their intended use. And interpreting results competently, within the limits of the evidence. That final one is where competent practitioners most often drift. Consent and confidentiality are visible procedures, with paperwork attached. Interpreting within the limits of the evidence is a judgement made alone. With nobody watching, and no form that records whether you did it.

The Stakes

A Test Score Becomes a Decision About a Life

The reason all of this is enforced so firmly is the consequence of getting it wrong. Test results can influence decisions about employment. Education. Treatment. So the stakes of ethical failure are high, and they fall on the person assessed. A poorly validated test can produce unfair outcomes. So can a sound test misapplied to a population for which it was never normed. And here is what makes that particularly serious. The person assessed has no way to detect the problem. The report looks exactly like a sound one, and carries exactly the same authority. So ethical practice ties the use of any instrument to documented evidence. Evidence of its appropriateness for this specific person, and this specific purpose. Not evidence that the test is respectable in general, which is a much weaker claim.

Failure Modes

Each Principle With the Way It Breaks

Each principle has a characteristic way of breaking. Beneficence. The obligation is to avoid harm. The failure is using a harmful procedure. Autonomy. Informed consent. The failure is testing without it. Fairness. Valid for the population. The failure is a misnormed instrument. Confidentiality. Protect records. The failure is leaking results. Competence. Use the tools properly. The failure is untrained interpretation. Read down that list of failures and notice something uncomfortable. Only two of the five are the kind of thing anyone would recognise as misconduct. The rest look like ordinary professional work, done slightly wrong. Which is precisely why they need to be written down as standards.

Standards

Selection, Administration, Scoring, Reporting

Professional standards specify how tests should be selected, administered, scored and reported. Three requirements carry most of the weight. Examiners must be competent in the instruments they use. Test security must be maintained, in order to protect validity. A test whose contents circulate freely stops measuring what it measured. And individuals must receive feedback in understandable terms. Standards also cover the unglamorous end of the process. The proper storage, and eventual disposal, of sensitive records. Which is worth taking seriously, because that is where a confidentiality failure is most likely to actually happen. Not through a dramatic breach. Through a filing cabinet, or an old drive.

Reporting

Do Not Sound More Certain Than You Are

Responsibility extends to how results are communicated. Practitioners must convey findings without overstating certainty. They must acknowledge measurement error. And they must guard against misuse by third parties. That third obligation is easy to miss, so state it plainly. Responsibility does not end when the report is handed over. A result passed to someone who will over-read it has been mis-communicated. Even if every individual sentence in the report was technically accurate. Uncertainty is the part most easily lost in transmission. Because the recipient wants an answer, and the caveat is the first thing that gets dropped.

The Refusal

Declining Is a Professional Act

Which brings us to the hardest obligation in this section. When a test's limitations make it unsuitable for a decision. Ethical responsibility includes declining to use it. Rather than offering a precise-sounding answer the evidence cannot support. A number produced under pressure does not stop being wrong. Merely because somebody urgently needed a number. This obligation is hard because refusing has a visible cost, and complying does not. Refusing produces an unhappy client today. A misapplied test produces an unfair decision later. To someone who will never find out why it went against them.

Case

The Screening Test That Was Never Validated for Hiring

Here is that refusal in a concrete case. An organisation wants to screen applicants with a personality test. One that was never validated for hiring. The test itself may be perfectly sound, for some other purpose entirely. The consulting psychologist declines. And recommends a job-relevant, properly validated assessment instead. Rather than risking unfair, indefensible decisions about applicants. Sit with that word indefensible for a moment. A decision made this way cannot be justified after the fact. Because the evidence that would justify it was never gathered in the first place.

Consolidate

Validity Is Where the Ethics Actually Live

The principle to carry out of this section is short. Ethical testing ties every use of an instrument to documented evidence. Evidence that it is valid for this person, and this purpose. And where such evidence is lacking, the ethical choice may be not to test. Anchor the ethics to validity, because misapplied tests cause real harm in real decisions. And uphold the standards through unglamorous means. Examiner competence. Test security. Informed consent. And honest, uncertainty-aware reporting of what was found.

About Psychology of Personality at UPI Study

Psychology of Personality (Psychology 300) is a self-paced online course of 83 video lessons in 13 chapters, from Freud, Adler and Jung to biological, behavioral, cognitive, existential and humanistic theories, traits, personality disorders and culture. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →

Compare: Abnormal Psychology vs Psychology of Personality

Why take it here

Why students take Psychology of Personality with UPI Study

What makes each person who they arePsychology of Personality compares the major explanations of why people differ: psychoanalytic and neo-analytic theories, biology and evolution, learning, cognition, existential and humanistic views, and trait models, plus how personality is measured and studied. It is a common course in psychology degrees.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Psychology of Personality carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Ethical Frameworks Governing Personality Testing and Assessment

What are the core ethical principles of personality testing?
The core principles are beneficence and avoiding harm, respect for autonomy, fairness, and integrity. Autonomy means people can make informed choices about being assessed, fairness means the test must be valid for the population it is used on, and integrity means honesty about what an assessment can and cannot establish. Each principle becomes a checkable obligation, such as informed consent, confidentiality, validity for the intended use, competent interpretation, and test security.
Why is it unethical to use a personality test on a population it was not normed for?
Using a test on a population it was never normed for can produce unfair outcomes, even if the test is sound for its original purpose. Results can shape decisions about employment, education, and treatment, and a misapplied report looks just as authoritative as a sound one, so the person assessed cannot detect the problem. Ethical practice therefore requires documented evidence that an instrument is appropriate for this specific person and purpose, not just respectable in general.
Why is test security important in psychological assessment?
Test security protects validity: if a test's contents circulate freely, it stops measuring what it was designed to measure. Professional standards require examiners to keep materials secure, to be competent in the instruments they use, and to give people feedback in understandable terms. The same standards cover the proper storage and eventual disposal of sensitive records, since confidentiality failures often happen through an unsecured filing cabinet or an old drive rather than a dramatic breach.
When should a psychologist refuse to use a personality test?
A psychologist should decline to use a test when its limitations make it unsuitable for the decision at hand. If an employer wants to screen job applicants with a personality test never validated for hiring, for example, the ethical choice is to refuse and recommend a job-relevant, properly validated assessment instead. Offering a precise-sounding answer the evidence cannot support risks unfair, indefensible decisions about people who may never learn why they were rejected.

About the Psychology of Personality course

How many college credits is Psychology of Personality?
Psychology of Personality (Psychology 300) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Psychology of Personality cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 83 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Psychology of Personality take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 83 lessons total about 8 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Psychology of Personality.

83 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Psychology of Personality →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Psychology of Personality
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →