UPI Study › Courses › Psychology of Personality › Free lessons › Lesson 6.6 Free with a free account
Integrating Biological and Environmental Perspectives on Personality
Psychology of Personality · Chapter 6: Biological and Evolutionary FoundationsSection 6.6 · lesson 40 of 8310 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Psychology of Personality.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Psychology of Personality
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Evolutionary Psychology and Adaptive Behavioral Patterns →← Sexual Identity, Person-Environment Interaction, and Personality FormationNext lesson: Evolutionary Psychology and Adaptive Behavioral Patterns →
In this lesson
Not a compromise between two positions, but the accurate description.
- Explain why the nature-nurture framing was abandoned
- Distinguish additive, interactive, correlational and epigenetic mechanisms
- Define interactionism and person-environment fit
- Name the three misconceptions an integrative view rules out
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,331 words). Read along, or search it.
Biological and Evolutionary Foundations
Integrating Nature and Nurture
How much of your personality is genetic, and how much is upbringing? That question feels precise. It sounds like it should have a number for an answer. It does not, and this section explains why not. We will look at why personality science abandoned the nature versus nurture framing. Distinguish four mechanisms by which genes and environment combine. Define interactionism, and the idea of person-environment fit. And name three specific misconceptions that an integrative view rules out. The third of those three is the one that sounds the most scientific, and it is wrong.
Question Retired
Which Matters More Has No Answer
The long-standing nature-nurture debate once framed genes and environment as rivals. Two competing explanations for personality, with one of them destined to win. Contemporary science has decisively moved beyond that opposition. The question is no longer whether nature or nurture matters more. It is how the two work together. Both are necessary. Neither is sufficient. And their contributions cannot be cleanly separated in any individual. That last clause is the one worth slowing down on. It is not saying the split is difficult to measure with current methods. It is saying that within one life, there is no split there to measure. Those are very different claims, and only the second one is being made.
Entangled
Three Ways the Separation Fails
The reason for that comes down to entanglement at every level. There are three specific ways the separation fails. First, genes influence the environments people experience. So what looks like an environmental effect may have been genetically selected. Second, environments influence whether genes are expressed at all. So what looks like a genetic effect may depend on a setting. Third, the same outcome can arise through different combinations of the two. Two people can end up equally anxious by entirely different routes. Which is why an integrative framework is not merely a compromise. It is not a polite middle position between two camps. It is the most accurate description available of how personality develops.
Four Mechanisms
How the Two Actually Combine
Several mechanisms describe how nature and nurture combine. There are four. Additive effects occur when genetic and environmental contributions simply sum together. Both contribute, and they contribute independently. Gene-environment interaction occurs when the effect of an environment depends on genotype. Same setting. Different effects on different people. Gene-environment correlation occurs when genotypes and environments systematically co-occur. Which we met in the last section. Nature shaping nurture. And epigenetic mechanisms, where experience regulates gene expression. The environment effectively switching genes on or off. Now notice which of those four behaves the way intuition expects. Only the first. Additive effects simply sum, so percentages make sense. The other three break exactly the arithmetic that makes a percentage feel meaningful.
The Links
Four Routes Into One Development
It is worth seeing the four mechanisms as routes into a single process. Additive effects, contributing independently. Gene-environment interaction, where sensitivity to a setting varies. Gene-environment correlation, where the setting itself is not randomly assigned. And epigenetic regulation, where experience tunes what genes do. All four feed into the same outcome. Personality development. And they feed in simultaneously, not one at a time. Which is why isolating any one of them in a real person is so difficult.
Interaction
The Same Environment Is Not the Same Environment
Take gene-environment interaction in more depth, because it is the most counter-intuitive. It occurs when the effect of an environment depends on genotype. So that the same experience affects different people differently. Research on stress sensitivity shows the pattern clearly. The same stressful environment predicts greater difficulty for individuals with certain genotypes. And little effect for others. So the environment alone does not tell the whole story. Its impact depends on the genes it meets. Two related models are worth naming here. Diathesis-stress is a model in which predisposition plus stress produces outcomes. Differential susceptibility is subtler, and more interesting. It refers to greater sensitivity to both good and bad environments. The same highly susceptible individuals are affected more by supportive settings, and by adverse ones. Which means sensitivity is not the same thing as vulnerability.
Epigenetics
Experience Turning Genes Up and Down
Epigenetics adds one further layer to all of this. It shows that experience can regulate gene expression. Without changing the underlying DNA sequence. Environmental factors such as stress, or nutrition, can switch genes on or off. Sometimes with lasting effects. This is why a phrase like the genes you were born with does less work than people assume. The sequence is indeed stable across your life. What the body does with that sequence is not. Together these mechanisms reveal a dynamic system. One in which biological and environmental influences continually shape one another, across the lifespan.
All At Once
The Mechanisms Are Not Alternatives
Now the point that makes this genuinely integrative rather than just a longer list. These mechanisms are not mutually exclusive. They typically operate together, within the same person. Consider how that stacks up. A genotype may raise sensitivity to a particular environment. That is interaction. It may also make that environment more likely to be encountered in the first place. That is correlation. And its expression may be tuned by that very experience. That is epigenetics. All three, at once, in one person. Recognizing this layered operation is what separates an integrative account. From a simple addition of separate genetic and environmental effects. It also explains why the tidy percentage never arrives.
The Principle
Partners, Not Competitors
Interactionism is the principle that ties the section together. Behaviour arises from the continuous interplay of person and situation. And of genes and environment. It treats stable dispositions and contextual influences as partners, rather than competitors. Under this view, predicting behaviour requires both terms. You need to know the person's tendencies. And the situation's demands. Because each shapes the meaning and impact of the other. Interactionism also accommodates change, which rival views struggle with. Because outcomes depend on the match between person and environment. Altering either side can shift the result.
In Ordinary Life
The Disposition Did Not Change
This principle is visible across everyday life, once you look for it. A student who seems unmotivated in one classroom. May thrive under a different teacher, or a different method. An employee who struggles in one role may excel in another. And here is what to notice about those cases. In each one, the disposition has not changed at all. Its meeting with a new environment simply yields a different result. Same person, different outcome, and no transformation required. Which is why interactionism encourages careful attention to context. Before concluding that a difficulty lies solely within the person. It also explains why interventions that change someone's environment. Can be as effective as those aimed at the person directly.
The Model
A Starting Point, a Shaping Force, an Engine
An integrative model brings all these strands together, in three parts. Genetic predispositions and early temperament are the starting point. Environments and experiences are the ongoing shaping forces. And the interaction and correlation between them is the engine of development. Personality, on this account, is neither fixed by biology. Nor written freely by the environment. It emerges from their lifelong collaboration. The practical value of that is a specific one. Because outcomes depend on the match between person and context. The same individual may flourish in one setting and struggle in another. So supporting development means seeking good person-environment fit. Rather than trying to change the person in isolation. That principle applies in education, in clinical practice, and in the workplace.
Consolidate
Three Claims This Rules Out
Finally, three misconceptions that an integrative understanding rules out. The first is genetic determinism. The belief that genes fix personality irreversibly. But high heritability describes variation in a population. Not an unchangeable destiny for any individual. And gene expression itself responds to experience. The second is environmental determinism. The assumption that upbringing alone writes personality on a blank slate. That ignores robust evidence for biological contributions, and for temperament. The third is the one that sounds the most scientific of all. That nature and nurture contribute fixed, separable percentages within a given person. Heritability statistics apply to populations, not to individuals. And the two influences are so entangled, through interaction, correlation and epigenetic regulation. That no clean split is possible within one life. Keeping those three cautions in mind is what protects you from most popular claims about personality.
About Psychology of Personality at UPI Study
Psychology of Personality (Psychology 300) is a self-paced online course of 83 video lessons in 13 chapters, from Freud, Adler and Jung to biological, behavioral, cognitive, existential and humanistic theories, traits, personality disorders and culture. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Psychology of Personality with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Psychology of Personality carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Integrating Biological and Environmental Perspectives on Personality
Why is nature versus nurture considered the wrong question?
What is gene-environment interaction?
What is epigenetics, and how does it relate to personality?
What is interactionism in personality psychology?
About the Psychology of Personality course
How many college credits is Psychology of Personality?
How much does Psychology of Personality cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Psychology of Personality take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Psychology of Personality.
83 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →