UPI Study › Courses › Psychology of Personality › Free lessons › Lesson 4.1 Free with a free account
The Psychodynamic Approach: Definitions, Scope, and Key Principles
Psychology of Personality · Chapter 4: Adlerian and Jungian TheoriesSection 4.1 · lesson 26 of 838 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Psychology of Personality.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Psychology of Personality
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Alfred Adler's Theory of Personality: Development and Birth Order →← Applications of Psychoanalytic Concepts in Contemporary PsychologyNext lesson: Alfred Adler's Theory of Personality: Development and Birth Order →
In this lesson
A family of theories held together by a method, not by agreement about content.
- Define the psychodynamic approach in precise terms
- State and explain its five core principles
- Explain why the approach relies on indirect evidence
- Locate Adler and Jung within the shared framework
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,022 words). Read along, or search it.
Adlerian and Jungian Theories
The Psychodynamic Approach
Adler and Jung are usually taught as Freud's rebellious students. That framing hides what actually matters about them. They disagreed with Freud about content, and kept his method. This section sets out that shared method. It is called the psychodynamic approach. And it is a family of theories, not a single theory. Get the shared commitments straight now. Everything Adler and Jung do later is a variation on them.
The Family
What Actually Unites These Theories
Start with the definition, and take it slowly. The psychodynamic approach locates the engine of personality in dynamic forces. Forces that are psychological, and often unconscious. Behaviour is treated as the visible outcome of interacting internal pressures. Wishes, fears, memories, and defences all compete for expression. So what you observe in a person is the settlement. Not the negotiation that produced it. The approach originated with Freud. It was then extended by Alfred Adler and by Carl Jung. Who disagreed with him, and with each other, about very nearly everything except the method.
Movement
Not a Catalogue of Traits
It helps to contrast this with the alternative you already know. A trait view asks what a person is like. It describes personality as a stable set of characteristics. Characteristics that can be measured, and compared across people. The psychodynamic view asks a different question. What is this person negotiating? It emphasises movement, conflict, and continual negotiation. Between what a person wants, and what their standards or reality permit. That difference is not decorative. It changes what counts as an explanation. A trait account explains by classifying. A psychodynamic account explains by naming the conflict.
The Method Problem
How to Study What Cannot Be Reported
Now the problem that shapes everything about how this approach works. Much of mental life is claimed to operate outside conscious awareness. Early experiences lay down templates. Templates that shape later relationships, motivation, and self-understanding. But those templates are not directly observable. That is a real constraint, not a rhetorical one. The theory's central objects cannot be asked about directly. So everything has to be reached sideways, through indirect evidence. Dreams, read as expressions of what is unavailable in waking life. Slips of the tongue, treated as carrying significance. Recurring relational patterns, which repeat despite what people say they intend. And the dynamics that surface inside therapy itself.
Five Commitments
The Shared Grammar
Five commitments hold the family together. Psychic determinism, the idea that mental events have causes. The importance of unconscious processes. The formative weight of early experience. The role of internal conflict. And the role of defence in shaping the personality a person presents. Later theorists diverged sharply on specifics. They retained all five of these anyway. Which is why they still count as one approach.
The Principles
What Each Commitment Claims
Take each principle with its illustration. Psychic determinism says mental events are caused, not random. A slip of the tongue reveals a hidden wish. The unconscious mind principle says much activity lies below awareness. There are motives the person genuinely cannot report. Early experience says childhood shapes later patterns. Relational templates come from caregivers. Internal conflict says competing forces seek expression. Desire runs against internalised rules. And defence says the mind protects itself from distress. Repression of a painful memory is the standard example.
Determinism
The Principle Doing the Most Work
One of those five does more work than the others. Psychic determinism is the principle that mental events have identifiable causes. It sounds modest. It is not. It rules out it just happened as an explanation. A forgotten name has a cause. So does an odd choice of word. So does an irritation you cannot account for. Which means none of them can be dismissed as noise. Everything becomes evidence. That is exactly where the power of the approach comes from. And it is also the risk sitting inside it. A commitment that everything is meaningful makes it hard to say when an interpretation is wrong. Hold the principle, and hold that cost along with it.
The Scope
From the Consulting Room Outward
The reach of the approach extends well past clinical work. It began in the consulting room. It now informs research on motivation. Research on attachment. And research on development. Notice which of those carry the strongest evidence. Attachment and development are where psychodynamic questions were converted. Converted into measurable procedures with standards outside the tradition. That conversion is what gives the approach its modern research standing.
Worked Example
The Employee Who Stumbles Before Every Promotion
Here is the approach doing what it does best. A capable employee repeatedly undermines themselves just before promotions. The timing is the striking part. Not occasional failure. Failure that arrives on a schedule. The surface reading is bad luck, or poor timing. An unfortunate run of circumstances. The psychodynamic question is different. What unconscious conflict is being enacted through the self-sabotage? One candidate answer is a fear of surpassing a parent. A motive the person would not report, because they do not have access to it. The move here is reframing irrational behaviour as meaningful. When a pattern repeats despite stated intentions, look for the motive it may be serving.
Handle Carefully
A Powerful Question With a Weak Stopping Rule
Now take that example seriously in both directions. The question is genuinely useful. And the answer was not established by anything. The value lies in what the framework makes you notice. Repeating patterns that survive a person's own intentions are real and observable. They are also easy to miss without a framework that expects them. The weakness is that indirect evidence rarely refutes anything. Dreams, slips, and relational patterns can support several interpretations at once. Fear of surpassing a parent is one story. Fear of visibility is another. So is exhaustion. Nothing in the method itself tells you which one to discard. So use the approach to generate candidate explanations. And require something else to choose among them.
Consolidate
One Grammar, Two Very Different Theories
Consolidate before the chapter splits in two directions. The approach is unified by method, not by content. It explains surface behaviour through underlying, often unconscious forces. Forces shaped by early experience and internal conflict. Agreement stops there. Adler emphasised social striving, and the drive to overcome felt inadequacy. Jung expanded the unconscious into a collective, symbolic domain. Those are very different theories. But both kept psychic determinism, the unconscious, early experience, conflict, and defence. Learn the shared grammar first and the rest of this chapter gets much easier. The contrasts only make sense against what both theorists assumed.
About Psychology of Personality at UPI Study
Psychology of Personality (Psychology 300) is a self-paced online course of 83 video lessons in 13 chapters, from Freud, Adler and Jung to biological, behavioral, cognitive, existential and humanistic theories, traits, personality disorders and culture. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Psychology of Personality with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Psychology of Personality carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About The Psychodynamic Approach: Definitions, Scope, and Key Principles
What is the psychodynamic approach to personality?
What core principles do all psychodynamic theories share?
How does the psychodynamic view of personality differ from the trait approach?
How would a psychodynamic psychologist explain self-sabotage?
About the Psychology of Personality course
How many college credits is Psychology of Personality?
How much does Psychology of Personality cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Psychology of Personality take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Psychology of Personality.
83 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →