UPI Study › Courses › Psychology of Personality › Free lessons › Lesson 10.2 Free with a free account
Existential vs. Humanistic Psychotherapy: Definitions and Distinctions
Psychology of Personality · Chapter 10: Existential Theories of PersonalitySection 10.2 · lesson 61 of 83video coming soon
← Introduction to Existentialist Psychology and Rollo May's TheoriesNext lesson: Core Themes of Existentialism: Freedom, Meaning, and Authenticity →
In this lesson
Two approaches that share almost everything, and differ on one thing that matters.
- Explain why both are called the third force
- Define humanistic and existential psychotherapy
- Contrast their views of anxiety and suffering
- Judge which stance a given client situation needs
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,059 words). Read along, or search it.
Existential Theories of Personality
Existential vs. Humanistic Psychotherapy
Two therapists can hold nearly identical values and still do very different work in the room. Both reject reductionism. Both treat the person as a whole. Both take the client's inner experience seriously. And then one of them nurtures, while the other challenges. This section is about where that split comes from. Humanistic and existential psychotherapy share almost everything. The place they part company is anxiety, and what it is for.
Common Ground
Why They Are Grouped Together
Both approaches are sometimes grouped together as the third force in psychology. Distinct from psychoanalysis, and distinct from behaviourism. The list of things they hold in common is long. Both reject reductionism, and treat the person as a whole. Both take subjective experience seriously. Both value the therapeutic relationship. Both emphasise the client's capacity for growth. And both aim to help people live fuller, more self-directed lives. Because of that overlap, they share much vocabulary and many techniques. Each views the client as an active agent, rather than a passive object of treatment. And each prizes empathy, genuineness, and respect. Which is why the distinctions turn out to be matters of emphasis, rather than outright opposition.
Porous Boundary
The History Explains the Blur
There is a historical reason the boundary is blurry. Several major figures moved between the two camps. They drew on both traditions in their clinical work. That intermingling is why many practitioners today describe themselves differently. They say they work in an existential-humanistic tradition, blending the strengths of each. So sharpen the distinction to learn it. But hold it loosely afterwards. Very few clinicians actually work at either pure extreme.
Definition One
Humanistic Psychotherapy
Take humanistic psychotherapy first, associated especially with Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow. It emphasises the innate human tendency toward growth and self-actualisation. Its core assumption is conditional, and worth stating precisely. Given the right conditions, people will naturally move toward their potential. Those conditions are warmth, empathy, and unconditional positive regard. So the therapist's role is to provide a supportive, non-judgmental environment. One in which that growth can unfold on its own. This approach tends to be optimistic about human nature. Problems are read as obstacles to an essentially positive developmental trajectory. Suffering is understood largely as blocked or distorted self-development. Which supportive conditions can help release. So change is not something to be forced. It unfolds once the blocking conditions are removed. That trust in the client's inherent direction is the defining feature of the humanistic stance.
Definition Two
Existential Psychotherapy
Existential psychotherapy shares those values, but shifts the emphasis sharply. It places far greater weight on confronting the difficult givens of existence. Freedom. Responsibility. Isolation. Meaninglessness. And death. And here is the crucial difference in assumption. It does not assume an automatic drive toward growth. It stresses that meaning and authenticity must be actively created. Through courageous choice, made in the face of those realities. Which changes what anxiety means in the therapy. Anxiety is viewed not merely as an obstacle. But as an inevitable, and even valuable, part of the human condition.
The Aim
Not Simply to Feel Better
So the existential therapist works to help the client face these concerns, rather than evade them. And the target of the work shifts accordingly. The aim is not simply to feel better. It is to live more honestly and more responsibly. Accepting the anxiety that comes with genuine freedom. That gives existential therapy a more philosophical tone. And sometimes a more challenging one, than purely supportive approaches. Because it asks clients to take ownership of their own existence.
The Divide
Nurture Versus Challenge
The central distinction lies in the stance toward human nature and suffering. Humanistic therapy assumes an inherent positive potential. One that unfolds under supportive conditions. Existential therapy emphasises confronting anxiety, choice, and limitation, in order to create meaning. Put it in a single line. Where the humanistic therapist nurtures, the existential therapist often challenges. Inviting the client to face hard truths. And those differences show up in what the sessions actually cover. Existential work may dwell on mortality, freedom, and responsibility. In ways that supportive humanistic therapy might deliberately soften.
Side By Side
Five Dimensions of Difference
Five dimensions make the contrast concrete. On human nature, humanistic sees us as innately growth-oriented. Existential sees us as free, responsible, and finite. On the source of suffering, humanistic points to blocked self-development. Existential points to avoided existential realities. On anxiety, humanistic treats it as an obstacle to reduce. Existential treats it as inevitable, and potentially meaningful. On therapist stance, one is nurturing and supportive. The other is challenging and honest. And on central aim, one actualises potential, while the other creates meaning and lives authentically. If you remember one row, remember the anxiety row. It is where the two approaches genuinely disagree about what the work is for.
In Practice
How Clinicians Actually Sequence Them
In contemporary practice the two are frequently integrated within a single course of therapy. And the sequence usually runs in one direction. A clinician might begin with humanistic warmth. Empathy, acceptance, no judgment. That establishes trust, so the client feels safe enough to look at difficult material. Then the clinician judges readiness, rather than assuming it. And introduces existential questions. Freedom, responsibility, mortality. From which meaning is created, rather than released or discovered. Notice the order. Safety comes before confrontation, not the other way round.
Same Crisis
Two Rooms, Two Invitations
Make it concrete with one client, facing one major life crisis. In humanistic therapy, they might be supported to reconnect with their inner strengths. And with their sense of self-worth. In existential therapy, the same client might be invited to do something harder. To confront the freedom and responsibility the crisis has revealed. And to ask what meaning they will choose to create from it. Neither of those is the correct answer in the abstract. The approaches are best seen as complementary points on a shared spectrum, rather than as rivals.
Consolidate
Matching Approach to Moment
Which leaves a practical question. Which one, and when? Knowing the distinction helps match approach to client and to situation. Consider the two failure modes, because they run in opposite directions. Existential challenge offered too early lands as pressure. When a client lacks safety, humanistic warmth may need to come first. The confrontation has nowhere to land without it. But warmth held too long stops being useful. When support alone is not enough, existential questions may be what moves the work. Questions about freedom, and about meaning. Flexible blending lets the therapist match depth and challenge to the client's needs at each stage. Which is why the distinction matters, even to clinicians who refuse to pick a side.
About Psychology of Personality at UPI Study
Psychology of Personality (Psychology 300) is a self-paced online course of 83 video lessons in 13 chapters, from Freud, Adler and Jung to biological, behavioral, cognitive, existential and humanistic theories, traits, personality disorders and culture. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Psychology of Personality with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Psychology of Personality carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Existential vs. Humanistic Psychotherapy: Definitions and Distinctions
What is the difference between humanistic and existential therapy?
What do humanistic and existential psychotherapy have in common?
What are the givens of existence in existential therapy?
Can humanistic and existential therapy be combined?
About the Psychology of Personality course
How many college credits is Psychology of Personality?
How much does Psychology of Personality cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Psychology of Personality take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Psychology of Personality.
83 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →