UPI Study › Courses › Psychology of Personality › Free lessons › Lesson 6.3 Free with a free account
Biological Determinants and Animal Behavior Applications
Psychology of Personality · Chapter 6: Biological and Evolutionary FoundationsSection 6.3 · lesson 37 of 8310 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Psychology of Personality.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Psychology of Personality
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Environmental Factors, Illness, and Toxic Influences on Personality →← Genetic Influence, Temperament, and Twin Study InsightsNext lesson: Environmental Factors, Illness, and Toxic Influences on Personality →
In this lesson
Systems that shape behaviour, and are remodelled by it.
- Name the biological systems linked to personality traits
- Summarise Eysenck's arousal account of extraversion
- Explain what behavioural syndromes in animals show
- State why causal direction is hard to establish here
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,249 words). Read along, or search it.
Biological and Evolutionary Foundations
Biological Determinants
Suppose you find that people high in a trait also differ in some brain system. The obvious reading is that the biology is causing the trait. But experience remodels those same systems, continuously. So the arrow could point either way, and often points both ways at once. That problem sits underneath everything in this section. We will name the biological systems linked to personality traits. Summarize Eysenck's arousal-based account of extraversion. Look at what stable temperament in other species actually shows. And be clear about why causal direction is so hard to establish here.
Get Concrete
Beyond Genes in the Abstract
The previous section dealt in heritability estimates, which are abstract by design. This one deals in machinery. Personality is shaped by concrete biological systems. Brain structures. Neurotransmitters. Hormones. The proposal is that differences in the sensitivity of these systems matter. And that they help explain why people vary in extraversion, impulsivity, and emotional stability. Take one example. Individual differences in reward-related brain circuits. These are associated with how strongly a person seeks novelty and social stimulation. Note the word associated. It will keep appearing, and it is not a synonym for causes.
The Systems
Several Inputs, One Temperament
It is worth holding the main systems in view together. Dopamine, associated with reward and approach behaviour. Serotonin, associated with mood regulation and impulse control. Cortisol, a stress hormone tied to the stress response. Testosterone, associated with dominance. And the amygdala, involved in fear processing. All of them feed into what we observe as temperament. But notice the shape of that. Several inputs, converging. Which is why no one of them can be read off from a person's behaviour.
The Links
What Each System Is Associated With
Take the links one at a time, as the source states them. Dopamine is linked to reward sensitivity and approach behaviour. In trait terms, to novelty seeking and extraversion. Serotonin is linked to mood regulation and impulse control. In trait terms, to emotional stability. Stress hormones such as cortisol are associated with reactivity under threat, and with anxiety. Hormones like testosterone have been associated with dominance and competitiveness. And the amygdala, through fear processing, is linked to behavioural inhibition. Now the warning that belongs with all of this. These systems do not act in isolation. Personality emerges from their balance and interaction. Not from any single chemical. Which is why the popular version, where one chemical explains one trait, is always too simple.
Both Ways
The Inputs Are Not Fixed Inputs
Here is the complication that reorganizes everything else in the section. These biological systems are themselves shaped by experience. Repeated stress can recalibrate cortisol responses. Rewarding or depriving environments can alter dopamine signalling over time. So the biological determinants of personality are not fixed inputs. They are living systems. They influence behaviour, and they are remodeled by it. That is why the causal question here is genuinely hard. If you find a difference in someone's stress response, you have not learned where it came from. It could be a starting condition. It could be a record of what they have lived through. Any claim that biology causes a trait has to survive that ambiguity first.
Eysenck
The Introvert Is Already Stimulated Enough
Several influential trait theories are grounded directly in biology. The best known is Eysenck's account of extraversion. He proposed that extraversion reflects differences in cortical arousal. That is, differences in baseline brain activation. Introverts, on this account, are more easily over-stimulated. And so are inclined to avoid intense input. Extraverts seek out stimulation, in order to reach a comfortable level. The elegant part is what the two groups have in common. Both are regulating toward a comfortable level of arousal. They differ in where that level starts. Not in what they are trying to achieve.
Two Systems
Sensitive to Reward, Sensitive to Punishment
Other models work from two systems rather than one dimension. A behavioural approach system, sensitive to reward and incentive. And a behavioural inhibition system, sensitive to punishment and threat. These are linked to traits such as impulsivity and anxiety. The useful feature is that the two systems are treated as independent. Which means a person can be strongly drawn toward rewards. And strongly alarmed by threats. At the same time, without contradiction. Underneath both Eysenck and these models sits one general principle. Stable traits often correspond to stable differences in how nervous systems respond. To reward, to threat, and to stimulation.
Why It Helps
Testable Predictions, Imperfect Maps
So what are these biologically anchored theories actually good for? Their real value is that they generate testable predictions. Predictions connecting brain function to behaviour. Which means predictions that can come back wrong, and sometimes do. That is worth more than explanatory reach. But state the limit alongside the strength. No theory maps a trait perfectly onto a single brain system. What the evidence supports is a broad correspondence. Not a one-to-one translation between a trait and a piece of biology. Keep the two claims attached to each other. A broad correspondence is a genuine finding. It is also a much weaker claim than the popular retelling makes it sound.
Not Only Us
Animals Have Stable Individual Differences Too
Personality-like consistency turns out not to be unique to humans. Researchers have documented stable individual differences in other species. These are often called animal temperament, or behavioural syndromes. And they have been found in species ranging from insects to primates. Animals reliably differ in boldness, aggression, sociability, and exploration. Now the property that makes this interesting. These differences predict behaviour across situations. Much as human traits do. That cross-situational consistency is exactly what makes something trait-like. Rather than just a reaction to whatever is happening at the time.
What It Buys
Experiments You Cannot Run on People
Comparative study is valuable for two quite different reasons. The first is methodological. It allows controlled breeding and experimentation that is impossible in humans. Which helps isolate genetic and neural contributions. The second is theoretical. It reveals evolutionary continuity. Suggesting the biological machinery underlying temperament is ancient, and widely shared. You can see the everyday version of this without a laboratory. Dog breeders and trainers routinely observe stable temperament differences. Some dogs are consistently bold and exploratory. Others are cautious and reserved, across many situations. And the traffic runs both ways. Animal findings inform theories of human personality, and are informed by them.
The Ledger
Strengths and the Limits That Come With Them
Set the strengths and the limits side by side, because they belong together. The approach grounds personality in measurable physiological systems. It connects psychology to neuroscience and genetics. It produces falsifiable hypotheses. And animal and twin research add converging evidence. Now the limits, which must be respected rather than mentioned in passing. Correlations between biology and behaviour are often modest. The direction of causation can be unclear, since experience itself shapes the brain. And reducing personality entirely to biology risks neglecting culture, learning, and meaning. So the most defensible position is a layered one. Treat biological systems as one essential layer of a larger, interactive account. Essential, and one layer. Not the whole account.
Consolidate
Tendencies, Not Destinies
Recognizing the biological substrate does explain real things. Why some traits emerge early, and remain stable. Why certain dispositions run in families. And why temperament can be observed before culture and learning have had much chance to operate. It also clarifies why purely environmental accounts of personality are incomplete on their own. But the same evidence cautions against fatalism, and this is the part to carry away. Because the systems involved are responsive to experience. Biological predisposition sets tendencies rather than destinies. So when a trait is tied to a brain or hormone system, remember two qualifiers. The link is usually probabilistic. And it is bidirectional. Biology shapes behaviour, and experience reshapes biology. Neuroscience and genetics describe the starting conditions, and the ongoing constraints. Within which experience, choice and culture continue to shape the person.
About Psychology of Personality at UPI Study
Psychology of Personality (Psychology 300) is a self-paced online course of 83 video lessons in 13 chapters, from Freud, Adler and Jung to biological, behavioral, cognitive, existential and humanistic theories, traits, personality disorders and culture. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Psychology of Personality with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Psychology of Personality carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Biological Determinants and Animal Behavior Applications
Which brain chemicals and hormones are linked to personality?
What is Eysenck's arousal theory of extraversion?
What are the behavioral approach system and behavioral inhibition system?
Do animals have personalities?
About the Psychology of Personality course
How many college credits is Psychology of Personality?
How much does Psychology of Personality cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Psychology of Personality take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Psychology of Personality.
83 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →