UPI Study › Courses › Psychology of Personality › Free lessons › Lesson 9.5 Free with a free account
Neisser's Contributions and the Cognitive Revolution in Psychology
Psychology of Personality · Chapter 9: Cognitive Theories of PersonalitySection 9.5 · lesson 57 of 838 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Psychology of Personality.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Psychology of Personality
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Human Personality and Computer Information Processing: A Comparative View →← Bandura's Social-Cognitive Theory and Vicarious LearningNext lesson: Human Personality and Computer Information Processing: A Comparative View →
In this lesson
How the mind got readmitted to psychology, and the warning the field's founder issued about it.
- Say why Neisser is called the father of cognitive psychology
- Define cognition as he defined it
- Explain ecological validity and why he demanded it
- Name the forces that drove the cognitive revolution
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,051 words). Read along, or search it.
Cognitive Theories of Personality
Neisser and the Cognitive Revolution
For about half a century, psychology's official position was that the mind was off limits. Not unimportant. Just not admissible as evidence. This section is about how that changed. It centres on Ulric Neisser, who named the field that replaced behaviorism. And then, remarkably, became one of its sharpest critics. His warning is the most useful thing in this section. A field can win an argument and still study its subject in the wrong place. Neisser thought cognitive psychology was in danger of doing exactly that.
The Pressure
Behaviorism Ran Out of Room
The strict behaviorist rule held for decades. So what eventually broke it? Not a philosophical argument, and not a change of taste. A set of problems the framework could not solve. Behaviorism had real limitations in explaining language. It struggled with complex thought. And a growing body of work on perception, attention and memory had nowhere to sit. A rule about evidence can survive a great deal of criticism. What it cannot survive is a topic it is unable to address. The mid-century shift was driven by what the framework could not reach. More than by what its critics happened to dislike about it.
The Founder
Neisser Names a Field
Ulric Neisser is often called the father of cognitive psychology. His nineteen sixty-seven book, Cognitive Psychology, is the reason. It gave the emerging field its name, and its agenda. Both halves of that sentence are doing work. A name lets scattered work be recognised as one enterprise rather than several. An agenda tells that enterprise what counts as a problem worth solving. Before the book, there was research on perception, on attention, on memory. After it, there was a field, with a shared object of study. That is a real contribution, even though it produced no new experimental finding.
The Definition
What Cognition Was Defined As
Neisser's definition of cognition is worth quoting closely. All the processes by which sensory input is transformed, reduced, elaborated, stored, recovered, and used. Read that list of verbs again, and notice what it rules out. Transformed. Reduced. Elaborated. Stored. Recovered. Used. Not one of those describes passive reception. The mind in this definition operates on what arrives. It does not simply register it. The definition is also deliberately broad. It gathers perception, attention and memory under one coherent framework. Rather than leaving them as separate specialisms that rarely spoke to each other.
The Achievement
Making Internal Process Respectable Again
The achievement here is easy to state and easy to underrate. Neisser helped establish the study of internal mental processes as a legitimate science. And, crucially, as a rigorous one. That word rigorous is carrying the whole argument. The behaviorist objection was never that the mind is uninteresting. It was that studying it could not be rigorous. So that is the objection this work had to answer. And it was answered by method, rather than by assertion. Which is why the revolution took decades, instead of a single manifesto.
The Turn
Neisser Criticises His Own Field
Here is the turn that makes Neisser worth studying rather than merely citing. He later became a constructive critic of the field he had named. In Cognition and Reality, he argued that laboratory studies risked becoming artificial. And he called for ecological validity. That means the study of cognition as it operates in real, everyday environments. Ecological validity is the extent to which findings apply to real-world settings. His insistence on it remains influential. And it tempers purely mechanical models of the mind. Note who is making this criticism. Not an opponent of cognitive psychology, but the person who defined it.
In Practice
Recall in the Lab and Recall at Work
The concern is concrete, and one example makes it obvious. A memory researcher finds that recall in a quiet lab differs sharply from recall in a busy workplace. The laboratory result is not wrong. It is a real, accurate finding about how memory behaves in a quiet room. The question is whether it holds where memory is actually used. Neisser's call for ecological validity is exactly this concern. And there is an uncomfortable irony in it. The control that makes a laboratory study clean is also what narrows it. Stripping out noise, interruption and stakes removes precisely the conditions. The conditions under which the process normally runs.
The Forces
Three Things Converged
The cognitive revolution was not one event. Several forces converged. First, the limitations of behaviorism in explaining language and complex thought. Second, the rise of the digital computer, as a model of information processing. And third, developments in linguistics and information theory. Together these reopened the mind as a proper object of scientific study. The middle one matters most for what comes next in this chapter. A metaphor arrived that made internal process describable. You could talk about encoding and storage and retrieval without embarrassment. Section nine point six examines that metaphor, and where it breaks down.
The Contrast
Two Views of the Same Organism
Set the two approaches side by side, dimension by dimension. On focus, behaviorism studies observable behavior only. The cognitive approach studies internal processes. On the model of mind, behaviorism treats it as a black box. The cognitive approach treats it as an active information processor. On the key mechanism, behaviorism says reinforcement. The cognitive approach says representation and processing. On the view of the person, behaviorism sees someone shaped by their environment. The cognitive approach sees an interpreter and an agent. And Neisser appears in both columns. He critiqued behaviorism's limits, and he named and defined what replaced it.
For Personality
What the Revolution Made Sayable
For personality theory specifically, the revolution was transformative. And it is worth being precise about how. It legitimized a set of constructs that earlier behaviorism had excluded. Beliefs. Expectancies. Schemas. Self-efficacy. Every construct in this chapter needed the revolution to have happened first. Kelly's constructs, Rotter's locus of control, Bandura's self-efficacy. None of them is admissible under Watson's rule. The revolution also provided a vocabulary. A vocabulary for describing how internal processes generate stable individual differences. Which is precisely what a cognitive theory of personality has to be able to do.
Consolidate
Named, Legitimised, Then Warned
Three steps, in order. Neisser named and organized the field. The nineteen sixty-seven book defined cognition, and gathered perception, attention and memory together. The revolution reopened internal process as legitimate science. Driven by behaviorism's limits, the computer, and work in linguistics and information theory. And then Neisser demanded ecological validity. Study the mind where it actually operates. Not only where it is convenient to observe it. The practical instruction has not changed since. When you model the mind, check that the findings hold in real-world settings.
About Psychology of Personality at UPI Study
Psychology of Personality (Psychology 300) is a self-paced online course of 83 video lessons in 13 chapters, from Freud, Adler and Jung to biological, behavioral, cognitive, existential and humanistic theories, traits, personality disorders and culture. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Psychology of Personality with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Psychology of Personality carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Neisser's Contributions and the Cognitive Revolution in Psychology
Why is Ulric Neisser called the father of cognitive psychology?
How did Ulric Neisser define cognition?
What is ecological validity?
What caused the cognitive revolution in psychology?
About the Psychology of Personality course
How many college credits is Psychology of Personality?
How much does Psychology of Personality cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Psychology of Personality take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Psychology of Personality.
83 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →