UPI Study › Courses › Psychology of Personality › Free lessons › Lesson 2.9 Free with a free account
Affective Communication and Charisma in Personality Evaluation
Psychology of Personality · Chapter 2: Methods and Ethics in Personality ResearchSection 2.9 · lesson 14 of 838 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Psychology of Personality.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Psychology of Personality
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Selecting and Applying Personality Assessment Techniques →← Ethical Frameworks Governing Personality Testing and AssessmentNext lesson: Selecting and Applying Personality Assessment Techniques →
In this lesson
Charisma is a measurable style, and it tells you nothing about whether the message is true.
- Define affective communication and its channels
- State what the Affective Communication Test measures
- Break charisma into observable behaviours
- Separate expressive skill from message validity
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,039 words). Read along, or search it.
Methods and Ethics in Personality Research
Affective Communication and Charisma in Personality Evaluation
Some people are more convincing than their arguments are. That gap is what this section is about, and how an evaluator is supposed to handle it. We will define affective communication, and the channels emotion travels through. Look at expressiveness as a stable individual difference that can be measured. Break charisma into observable components rather than treating it as a mystery. And end on the discipline that keeps delivery from quietly becoming evidence.
The Construct
Emotion Travels Through Several Channels
Affective communication refers to the expression and transmission of emotion. Through both nonverbal and verbal channels. Facial expression. Tone. Gesture. And timing. That last channel is the one people leave out, so it is worth pausing on. When a pause falls, and how long it is allowed to last. Carries emotional information as reliably as an expression does. None of these channels is optional in a live interaction. Even a flat delivery is transmitting something, and an audience reads it. There is no neutral setting on any of these channels.
A Stable Difference
Expressiveness as a Disposition
Individuals differ markedly in how expressive they are. And the Affective Communication Test was developed to measure that disposition. It captures how readily, and how vividly, a person conveys feeling to others. Two verbs there, and they are doing different work. Readily is about threshold. How easily emotion shows at all. Vividly is about intensity, once it does show. A person can be quick to express, and understated about it. Treating this as a stable individual difference is what makes it a personality variable. Rather than a description of how somebody happened to be that afternoon. The claim is that expressiveness travels with the person, across occasions.
Why It Matters
Expressive Style Predicts Social Influence
Expressive ability matters because it shapes social influence. Highly expressive people can transmit enthusiasm and emotion. In ways that move audiences. Less expressive individuals may communicate competence, yet stir less feeling. Notice what that sentence does not say. It does not say they communicated less competence. The content can be identical. What differs is how much of it registers affectively with the people receiving it. So measuring expressiveness links a person's emotional style to observable effects on others. Which is what makes it worth measuring at all. A trait with no visible consequence would be a curiosity, not a variable. Here the consequence lands on other people, which is unusual and useful.
Charisma
A Word That Usually Explains Nothing
Charisma is usually treated as something that resists explanation. It is often understood as a blend of expressiveness, self-assurance, and the capacity to inspire others. Within personality evaluation, it is treated not as magic. But as a describable cluster of behaviours. Emotional expressiveness. Fluent communication. And responsiveness to an audience. Each of those can be observed, and to a degree, measured. That reframing is the whole contribution of the section. Saying that someone is charismatic explains nothing at all. Naming which behaviours produced the impression explains a great deal. And unlike magic, a list of behaviours can be checked by a second observer.
Decomposed
Five Components and Their Cues
Broken into components, charisma has five parts, each with an observable cue. Expressiveness. Vivid emotional display. The cue is facial and vocal animation. Self-assurance. Confident bearing. Steady posture, and a steady voice. Fluency. Smooth communication. Articulate delivery. Responsiveness. Reading the audience. Visible adjustment to feedback in the room. And warmth. Conveyed positivity. An approachable manner. That third column is what makes evaluation possible at all. Each component is anchored to something a rater can actually see or hear. Rather than something they have to infer from an overall impression.
The Warning
Persuasive Independent of Substance
Now the caution, which is the reason any of this belongs in a methods chapter. Expressive charm can be persuasive independent of substance. The two vary separately. A vividly delivered argument and a sound argument are different properties. And an audience registers the first one more immediately. Be careful how you hear that. It is not a claim that charismatic people are untrustworthy. It is a claim that delivery carries no information about accuracy, in either direction. A dull speaker is not more likely to be right. Which means the impression charisma creates is unearned as evidence. Even in the cases where the speaker happens to be correct.
The Discipline
Score the Style, Judge the Content Separately
So the discipline is straightforward to state. Assessors distinguish the ability to convey emotion. From the validity of the message being conveyed. Two judgements, made separately, and recorded separately. Collapsing them is exactly how surface appeal enters a decision unnoticed. Treating charisma as a measurable expressive style. Rather than as an indicator of truth or competence. Keeps evaluation grounded, and resistant to being swayed by surface appeal.
In The Room
Why Separation Is Hard in Practice
In practice that separation is harder than it sounds, and it is worth knowing why. Expressive delivery does not feel like influence while it is working. It feels like the argument being unusually clear. That is the whole problem. The effect disguises itself as comprehension. So the separation has to be procedural, rather than merely intentional. Rate the substance against criteria fixed before the presentation begins. An evaluator who simply plans to stay objective, without a structure, usually does not.
Case
The Candidate Who Presented Beautifully
Here is the discipline applied in an ordinary hiring panel. The panel is impressed by a candidate's animated, charismatic presentation. That impression is real. It is also entirely unanalysed. A trained evaluator notes the strong expressiveness. Then separately assesses the substance of the answers. Both observations are kept in the record. Neither is allowed to stand in for the other. Which is what avoids a decision being made on delivery alone. And notice that expressiveness is not deleted from the assessment. For some roles it is genuinely job-relevant. It is simply scored as what it is, rather than as evidence of something else.
Consolidate
Two Things Worth Measuring, Kept Apart
Two things are worth measuring here, and the work is in keeping them apart. Measure expressiveness, because emotional style predicts social influence. That is a real, observable effect on other people. And it belongs in an evaluation, where it is relevant to the role. Evaluate charisma by breaking it into observable behaviours. And by distinguishing expressive skill from the accuracy of the underlying message. Charisma is a measurable expressive style. It is not a sign of truth, and it is not a sign of competence. Keep those two judgements apart, and charisma stops being a hazard in an evaluation. Collapse them, and it quietly decides the outcome.
About Psychology of Personality at UPI Study
Psychology of Personality (Psychology 300) is a self-paced online course of 83 video lessons in 13 chapters, from Freud, Adler and Jung to biological, behavioral, cognitive, existential and humanistic theories, traits, personality disorders and culture. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Psychology of Personality with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Psychology of Personality carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Affective Communication and Charisma in Personality Evaluation
What is affective communication in psychology?
What does the Affective Communication Test measure?
What are the components of charisma in personality psychology?
Why should evaluators separate charisma from the content of a message?
About the Psychology of Personality course
How many college credits is Psychology of Personality?
How much does Psychology of Personality cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Psychology of Personality take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Psychology of Personality.
83 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →