Genetics, Environment, and Type A/B Personality Interactions

UPI Study › Courses › Psychology of Personality › Free lessons › Lesson 2.7 Free with a free account

Genetics, Environment, and Type A/B Personality Interactions

Psychology of Personality · Chapter 2: Methods and Ethics in Personality ResearchSection 2.7 · lesson 12 of 838 min · free with a free account

← Nomothetic and Idiographic Analyses of Personality TraitsNext lesson: Ethical Frameworks Governing Personality Testing and Assessment →

Earn 3 college credits for Psychology of PersonalityRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Psychology 300 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Psychology of Personality · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

Heritable does not mean fixed, and the two causes do not simply add up.

  • Explain what twin and adoption studies estimate
  • Distinguish gene-environment interaction from correlation
  • Explain why heritability is not fixedness
  • Identify which part of Type A carries the health risk

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,055 words). Read along, or search it.

Methods and Ethics in Personality Research

Genetics, Environment, and Type A and Type B Patterns

Heritability estimates get misread more often than almost any statistic in psychology. People hear a genetic percentage and conclude that a trait is fixed. That inference does not follow, and this section explains exactly why. We will look at what twin and adoption studies actually estimate. At two different ways genes and environments combine, which are often confused. And at the Type A and Type B framework, including how research narrowed it. That last part is a good example of a popular idea outliving the evidence for it.

The Estimate

What Twin and Adoption Studies Show

Personality emerges from the interplay of genetic predispositions and environmental experiences. Twin and adoption studies are how researchers estimate the balance. They estimate that a substantial portion of variation in major traits is heritable. But the same studies carry the other half of the finding. Environment, including unique individual experiences, accounts for much of the remaining variation. Both numbers come out of the same analysis. You do not get to quote one and ignore the other. The method itself is worth understanding. It compares similarity among twins and adoptees. Groups who differ in how many genes they share, and how much environment they share. The comparison between those groups is what isolates each contribution.

A Common Error

Heritable Is Not the Same as Fixed

Now the error this material invites, and it is worth naming precisely. Heritability is a statement about variation in a population. It is the proportion of trait variation attributable to genes across a group. It is not a statement about how changeable any one person's trait is. Those two claims get conflated constantly. And the conflation always runs the same direction. From a population statistic, to a verdict about an individual. Heritability is never the whole story in any case. The studies producing the genetic estimate also show environment carrying much of the rest. A high heritability figure is not a closed door. It is one term in a longer expression.

The Exchange

A Loop, Not a Split

Picture the relationship as a loop, rather than as a division of shares. A genetic predisposition exists. It expresses itself under certain conditions, and not under others. The person, carrying that disposition, partly selects the environments they enter. And those environments shape how the disposition is expressed. Which then feeds back into the next round of selection. Notice that nowhere in this loop, do the causes sit still long enough to be added up. That is the real objection to the nature-versus-nurture framing.

Two Mechanisms

Interaction and Correlation Are Different Claims

Two mechanisms are at work in that loop, and they are different claims. The first is gene-environment interaction. A genetic predisposition may express itself only under certain conditions. Change the conditions, and the genetic effect itself changes. The second is gene-environment correlation. People partly shape and select the environments that then influence them. The disposition helps choose its own input, which is a stranger idea than it sounds. A sociable child seeks out situations that further reward sociability. So genes and environment interact, rather than simply adding together. Which is why the familiar question is badly formed. How much is nature, how much is nurture, assumes two separable contributions to be stacked. Personality is better understood as a developing product of continuous exchange between disposition and context.

Two Styles

Type A and Type B

The second half of this section concerns a different kind of framework. The Type A and Type B distinction describes contrasting behavioural styles. Type A individuals tend to be competitive, and time-urgent. And easily provoked to impatience, or hostility. Type B individuals are more relaxed, patient, and even-tempered. Note what kind of construct this is. These are behavioural styles. Patterns of how a person moves through ordinary demands. Not dimensions that fell out of a factor analysis, like the Big Five.

Feature By Feature

Where the Two Patterns Diverge

Compare the two patterns feature by feature. Pace. Time-urgent, against relaxed. Competitiveness. High, against lower. Hostility. Often elevated, against low. Stress response. Reactive, against even-tempered. And the health note. Hostility is a risk factor, against lower related risk. Keep your eye on that hostility row in particular. The next part of this section is about why that single row carries most of the finding.

Origins

The Framework Came From a Health Question

The framework did not begin as a theory of personality. The Type A and Type B distinction was developed partly through interest in health. Specifically, links between behaviour pattern and physical health. And most of all, cardiovascular outcomes. That origin explains the shape of the framework. It was not built to describe personality comprehensively. It was built around one specific outcome. Which is why it looks coarse when set next to a five-dimension trait model. Two categories, where the trait tradition would use five continua.

The Refinement

It Was Not the Ambition

Then research refined the original picture, and the refinement is the important part. The hostility component of the Type A pattern. Rather than ambition or busyness alone. Appears most strongly associated with health risk. That distinction matters practically, and it is usually lost in popular retellings. Being busy and driven is not the finding. The finding sits on the irritable, antagonistic part of the pattern. This is what it looks like when a framework survives contact with evidence. The original grouping was too broad. Testing narrowed it to the component actually doing the work. And the popular version of the idea never quite caught up with that correction.

Case

Two Siblings, One Disposition

Put the genetics and the behaviour pattern together in one family. Two siblings share a competitive disposition. The same starting material, as far as the disposition goes. One channels it into athletics. The other, in a high-pressure job, develops the hostile, time-urgent Type A pattern. Which is the pattern linked to elevated cardiovascular risk. Same predisposition. Different context. Different outcome. Including, in this case, a different physical outcome. That is gene-environment interaction, stated at the scale of one family. The disposition did not determine the expression. It determined what the environment had to work with.

Consolidate

Why the Interaction Framing Earns Its Keep

Why insist on the interaction framing, rather than a simpler story? Because predispositions express themselves through experience. And because people help select the very environments that shape them. Traits rarely reflect genes or environment alone. So an account that reports one number and stops has answered a question nobody should have asked. And the Type A material shows why this reaches beyond psychology. Broad behavioural styles arise from both temperament and learned habits. And they can carry consequences extending well into physical well-being. A personality pattern is not only a description of someone. Sometimes it is a risk factor.

About Psychology of Personality at UPI Study

Psychology of Personality (Psychology 300) is a self-paced online course of 83 video lessons in 13 chapters, from Freud, Adler and Jung to biological, behavioral, cognitive, existential and humanistic theories, traits, personality disorders and culture. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →

Compare: Abnormal Psychology vs Psychology of Personality

Why take it here

Why students take Psychology of Personality with UPI Study

What makes each person who they arePsychology of Personality compares the major explanations of why people differ: psychoanalytic and neo-analytic theories, biology and evolution, learning, cognition, existential and humanistic views, and trait models, plus how personality is measured and studied. It is a common course in psychology degrees.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Psychology of Personality carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Genetics, Environment, and Type A/B Personality Interactions

What does heritability mean in personality research?
Heritability is the proportion of variation in a trait across a population that is attributable to genetic differences. It is estimated from twin and adoption studies, which compare people who share different amounts of genes and environment. Heritability describes a group, not how changeable one person's trait is, so a high figure does not mean a trait is fixed. The same studies show that environment, including each person's unique experiences, accounts for much of the remaining variation.
What is the difference between gene-environment interaction and gene-environment correlation?
Gene-environment interaction means the effect of a genetic predisposition depends on the environment, so it may be expressed only under certain conditions. Gene-environment correlation means people partly select and shape the environments that then influence them; a sociable child, for example, seeks out situations that further reward sociability. Together these mechanisms show that genes and environment do not simply add up, which is why asking how much of personality is nature versus nurture is poorly formed.
What are Type A and Type B personalities?
Type A and Type B are contrasting behavioral styles. Type A individuals tend to be competitive, time-urgent, and easily provoked to impatience or hostility, while Type B individuals are more relaxed, patient, and even-tempered. Cardiologists Meyer Friedman and Ray Rosenman introduced the distinction in the 1950s while studying behavior and heart disease. Unlike the Big Five, it uses two broad categories built around one health outcome rather than dimensions derived from factor analysis.
Is Type A personality linked to heart disease?
Research suggests the link centers on hostility rather than on the whole Type A pattern. Later studies refined the original idea, finding that the hostile, antagonistic component, rather than ambition or busyness alone, appears most strongly associated with cardiovascular risk. Being busy and driven is not the main concern; chronic irritability and antagonism are. Popular accounts of Type A personality often miss this refinement, which shows how testing can narrow an overly broad idea.

About the Psychology of Personality course

How many college credits is Psychology of Personality?
Psychology of Personality (Psychology 300) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Psychology of Personality cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 83 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Psychology of Personality take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 83 lessons total about 8 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Psychology of Personality.

83 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Psychology of Personality →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Psychology of Personality
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →