Evolutionary Psychology and Adaptive Behavioral Patterns

UPI Study › Courses › Psychology of Personality › Free lessons › Lesson 6.7 Free with a free account

Evolutionary Psychology and Adaptive Behavioral Patterns

Psychology of Personality · Chapter 6: Biological and Evolutionary FoundationsSection 6.7 · lesson 41 of 8310 min · free with a free account

← Integrating Biological and Environmental Perspectives on PersonalityNext lesson: Psychodynamic Psychology: Core Definitions and Key Principles →

Earn 3 college credits for Psychology of PersonalityRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Psychology 300 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Psychology of Personality · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

Powerful used rigorously, speculation used loosely.

  • State the central premise of evolutionary psychology
  • Explain evolutionary mismatch with an example
  • Describe how variation persists as alternative strategies
  • Identify the just-so story charge and the naturalistic fallacy

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,292 words). Read along, or search it.

Biological and Evolutionary Foundations

Evolutionary Psychology

An evolutionary explanation for a human behaviour is one of the most satisfying things in psychology. It is also one of the easiest things to fake. The same lens produces genuinely well-supported findings, and complete inventions. And they can be hard to tell apart from the outside. So this section is about both halves. We will state the central premise of evolutionary psychology. Explain evolutionary mismatch, with an example. See how personality variation is reframed as alternative strategies. And name the two errors the field is most criticized for.

The Premise

Not a General-Purpose Blank Slate

Evolutionary psychology applies the principles of natural and sexual selection to the human mind. The proposal is that our psychological mechanisms evolved for a reason. That they solved recurrent adaptive problems faced by our ancestors. And that leads to a strong architectural claim. On this view, the mind is not a general-purpose blank slate. It is a collection of specialized systems. Shaped to handle particular challenges. Finding mates. Caring for kin. Cooperating. Avoiding danger. Notice how much weight that claim carries. It is not just saying evolution shaped us, which almost nobody disputes. It is saying the mind is organized into specific, purpose-built systems.

Mismatch

Built for Conditions That No Longer Exist

A key idea in the field is the match, or the mismatch, with modern environments. Because these mechanisms were shaped over a long ancestral past. They may be well suited to conditions that no longer exist. And poorly suited to features of contemporary life. The standard example is dietary. The widespread human preference for sweet and fatty foods. It made obvious sense in ancestral environments where calories were scarce. In modern settings of abundance, that same preference can contribute to overeating. Now look at the logical shape of that, because it generalizes. Adaptive is always adaptive relative to a set of conditions. Change the conditions, and the very same tendency becomes a liability. Without the tendency itself changing at all.

The Candidates

Behaviours Proposed as Evolved Patterns

Evolutionary psychology has generated hypotheses about many recurring human behaviours. Mate selection, proposed to improve reproductive success, showing up as preferences in partners. Kin altruism, proposed to aid shared genes, showing up as helping relatives. Reciprocity, proposed to stabilize cooperation, showing up as returning favours. Threat detection, proposed to help avoid danger, showing up as fast fear responses. And status seeking, proposed to secure access to resources and mates. Read the middle column of that list carefully. The source says proposed, and it means it. These are interpretations of behaviour as outputs of evolved mechanisms. Personality differences are then understood partly as variation. In how strongly, or in what circumstances, these mechanisms are engaged.

Two Altruisms

Helping, Explained Two Different Ways

Two of those deserve a closer look, because they explain the same behaviour differently. Kin altruism means helping relatives who share one's genes. Reciprocal altruism means helping non-relatives who may help in return. Both are proposed to explain patterns of cooperation and generosity. Separately, threat-detection systems are invoked to explain rapid fear responses to certain stimuli. And in each case, notice what kind of claim is being made. The claim is that the behaviour reflects a design feature shaped by selection. Not merely a product of individual learning. That is a much stronger claim than saying the behaviour is common. It is also considerably harder to establish.

Careful Distinction

The Mechanism Is Not the Behaviour

Evolutionary psychologists are careful about one distinction, and it is worth understanding properly. The distinction between the evolved mechanism, and its behavioural output. The mechanism is the underlying, inherited system. The behaviour it produces depends on the input it receives from the current environment. So the same mate-preference system. Can yield quite different choices in different ecological and cultural settings. This distinction does real work for the theory. It lets the theory accommodate behavioural flexibility. While still claiming a universal, evolved architecture underneath. But notice what that flexibility costs. If very different behaviours can all be outputs of the same mechanism. Then observing behaviour constrains the claim less than it first appears to. Hold on to that, because it connects directly to the main criticism ahead.

Why Variation

Traits as Alternative Strategies

Now to a genuinely useful contribution. Why do stable personality differences exist at all? Why has selection not produced one optimal human type? Evolutionary thinking offers an answer. Different strategies are favoured under different conditions. So the variation itself is maintained by selection, rather than being eroded by it. That reframes traits as alternative adaptive strategies. Rather than as deviations from a single ideal. Risk-taking, cooperation and dominance can each pay off. In particular social and ecological niches. And this complements behavioural genetics rather neatly. It suggests why heritable variation in personality persists. Rather than being eliminated by selection over time.

Rare Pays

When Being Unusual Is the Advantage

There is a second mechanism proposed for maintaining variation. Frequency-dependent selection. This is where a strategy's success depends on how common it is. Rare strategies may thrive precisely because they are rare. That idea is worth holding on to, because of what it explains. It accounts for persistent variation without appealing to any fixed optimum. A strategy that spreads can undermine its own advantage as it becomes common. Which keeps the mix from collapsing into a single type. Stable diversity, produced by the selection process itself.

Strengths

What the Approach Genuinely Delivers

So let us be fair about the strengths, before turning to the criticism. Evolutionary psychology provides a unifying functional framework. It generates novel, and sometimes well-supported, predictions. And it connects human behaviour to the broader biological world. That last point is not decorative. It is a real constraint on theorizing. And importantly, many of its hypotheses have empirical backing. Hypotheses about mating, cooperation and threat response. These have received cross-cultural and experimental support. That support is exactly what separates the defensible claims from the rest. The field is not uniformly speculative, and treating it as such would be lazy.

The Charge

Just-So Stories

The approach also faces serious criticism, and the main charge has a name. Just-so stories. The claim is that some evolutionary explanations are plausible-sounding accounts. Accounts that are difficult to test, or to falsify. And here is the precise problem with a just-so story. It is not that it is obviously wrong. It is that it would have sounded equally convincing. If the finding had come out the opposite way. An explanation that fits any possible result is not doing explanatory work. Which is why the demand is for converging evidence. Cross-cultural data. Experimental tests. Comparison with other species. Plausibility is not evidence, however satisfying it feels to hear.

Second Error

Natural Does Not Mean Good

The second criticism is not about method. It is about reasoning. Critics warn against assuming that what is natural is therefore good. Or that it is inevitable. That logical error is known as the naturalistic fallacy. It travels very easily from research into public argument. A claim that a tendency was once adaptive. Says nothing whatsoever about whether it should be acted on now. Or tolerated. Or excused. Those are separate questions, and evolution does not answer them. So the balanced conclusion is this. Used rigorously, with attention to testability and converging evidence, evolutionary psychology is a valuable lens. Used loosely, it risks unfounded speculation.

Consolidate

The Ultimate Why, Beside the Proximate How

Finally, how this fits with everything else in the chapter. Evolutionary psychology is most powerful when integrated with the other approaches. Rather than treated as a rival to them. It supplies the ultimate why. The functional reasons traits exist. Genetics, neuroscience and developmental science supply the proximate how. The mechanisms that produce behaviour in real time. Those two kinds of explanation are complementary, not competing. A trait can have a functional history and a physiological mechanism, and it needs both. So here is the full picture the chapter has been building. Evolved mechanisms shaped by ancestral selection. Expressed through genes and brain systems. Calibrated by environment and experience. And varied across individuals, as alternative strategies. That synthesis, rather than any single perspective, explains why people are both deeply similar and enduringly different.

About Psychology of Personality at UPI Study

Psychology of Personality (Psychology 300) is a self-paced online course of 83 video lessons in 13 chapters, from Freud, Adler and Jung to biological, behavioral, cognitive, existential and humanistic theories, traits, personality disorders and culture. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →

Compare: Abnormal Psychology vs Psychology of Personality

Why take it here

Why students take Psychology of Personality with UPI Study

What makes each person who they arePsychology of Personality compares the major explanations of why people differ: psychoanalytic and neo-analytic theories, biology and evolution, learning, cognition, existential and humanistic views, and trait models, plus how personality is measured and studied. It is a common course in psychology degrees.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Psychology of Personality carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Evolutionary Psychology and Adaptive Behavioral Patterns

What is evolutionary mismatch?
Evolutionary mismatch occurs when psychological mechanisms shaped in the ancestral past fit poorly with modern conditions. The standard example is the human preference for sweet and fatty foods, which made sense when calories were scarce but can contribute to overeating amid modern abundance. A tendency is adaptive only relative to a set of conditions, so when conditions change, the same tendency can become a liability.
Why do personality differences persist if evolution favors the best traits?
Evolutionary thinking suggests there is no single best personality, because different strategies pay off under different conditions. Risk-taking, cooperation, and dominance can each succeed in particular social or ecological niches, so selection maintains variation. Frequency-dependent selection adds another mechanism: a strategy can succeed because it is rare and lose its advantage as it spreads. This helps explain why heritable personality variation persists.
What is a just-so story in evolutionary psychology?
A just-so story is a plausible-sounding evolutionary explanation that is difficult to test or falsify. The problem is not that it is obviously wrong but that an equally convincing story could be told if the finding had come out the opposite way. Critics therefore demand converging evidence, such as cross-cultural data, experimental tests, and comparisons with other species, because plausibility alone is not evidence.
What is the naturalistic fallacy?
The naturalistic fallacy is the error of assuming that what is natural is therefore good; critics of evolutionary psychology also warn against the related error of assuming an evolved tendency is inevitable. Showing that a tendency was once adaptive says nothing about whether it should be acted on, tolerated, or excused today. Those are separate moral questions that evolution does not answer, and confusing them lets research claims slide into weak public arguments.

About the Psychology of Personality course

How many college credits is Psychology of Personality?
Psychology of Personality (Psychology 300) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Psychology of Personality cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 83 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Psychology of Personality take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 83 lessons total about 8 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Psychology of Personality.

83 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Psychology of Personality →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Psychology of Personality
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →