Comparative Analysis of Freud and Erikson's Psychoanalytic Approaches

UPI Study › Courses › Psychology of Personality › Free lessons › Lesson 3.4 Free with a free account

Comparative Analysis of Freud and Erikson's Psychoanalytic Approaches

Psychology of Personality · Chapter 3: Psychoanalytic Theories of PersonalitySection 3.4 · lesson 21 of 838 min · free with a free account

← Freud's Reality Principle, Contributions, and LimitationsNext lesson: Erikson's Psychosocial Development: Stages and Growth →

Earn 3 college credits for Psychology of PersonalityRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Psychology 300 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Psychology of Personality · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

Erikson kept the architecture and replaced almost everything inside it.

  • Identify the assumptions Freud and Erikson share
  • Explain how Erikson's view of the ego differs
  • Contrast the scope, content and tone of the two theories
  • Judge which theory a given case is better suited to

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,073 words). Read along, or search it.

Psychoanalytic Theories of Personality

Freud and Erikson Compared

A revision can look like agreement until you check what it actually changed. Erik Erikson is usually taught as a follower of Freud. He trained inside the psychoanalytic tradition, and he never left it. But he kept the architecture and replaced almost everything inside it. This section separates the two carefully. First what they share, which is more than most students expect. Then where they diverge, which is sharper than most summaries admit. By the end you should be able to say which theory fits which case, and why.

Shared Ground

Why Erikson Counts as Psychoanalytic At All

Begin with what Erikson kept, because that is what makes him psychoanalytic. He accepted that unconscious forces genuinely shape behaviour. He accepted the formative power of early experience. He kept development proceeding through ordered stages marked by conflict. He retained the id, ego and superego structure. And he agreed that unresolved early conflicts can constrain later functioning. He also kept the epigenetic logic. Each phase builds on the ones that came before it, in a fixed order. Erikson did not loosen that requirement at all. He extended it across a great deal more of a life.

Ego Psychology

The Ego Gets Promoted

The first real divergence is about the ego, and it is easy to underrate. In Freud's picture the ego is embattled. It survives by negotiation, pressed between the id and the superego. Reality sets the outer limits, and the ego just manages. Erikson treats the ego very differently. As an active, competent organiser of experience. Capable of growth and mastery throughout life, not just survival. That emphasis is what gets called ego psychology. And it is not a small edit. If the ego can grow, development is not merely the working-off of childhood damage. It can add capacities that were never there in the first place.

The Divergence

Two Theories on Two Axes

Put the two theories on two axes and the contrast becomes legible. The horizontal axis is time span. How long does development run? The vertical axis is the engine. What actually drives it? Freud sits low and left. Development driven by bodily, libidinal focus, and finishing at puberty. Erikson sits high and right. Development driven by social and cultural relationships, running to the end of life. Neither position is a compromise of the other. They are genuinely different bets about where personality gets made.

Side by Side

Six Dimensions of Difference

Six dimensions carry most of the difference. Driving force. Freud says sexual and aggressive instincts. Erikson says social relationships and identity. Stage type. Psychosexual for Freud, psychosocial for Erikson. Time span. Birth to puberty, against birth to death. Number of stages. Five, against eight. Tone. Deterministic and pessimistic, against developmental and optimistic. And the role of the ego. A mediator under pressure, against an active organiser of growth. Learn this table as pairs, not as a list. Each row is a decision one theorist made and the other reversed.

Scope

Development That Does Not Stop at Puberty

Take scope first, because it is the most consequential difference. Freud's stages end at puberty, with the genital stage. Erikson described eight stages stretching all the way to old age. Why extend it? Because he observed meaningful psychological change well beyond childhood. A theory that closes at puberty has nothing to say about most of a human life. Now notice a subtler consequence for anyone using these frameworks. Freud's model cannot be wrong about midlife. It makes no claims about midlife at all. Erikson's model can be wrong about it. And having claims that could fail is a point in a theory's favour, not against it.

Content

From Bodily Zones to Social Relationships

Next, content. What is the conflict actually about? Freud centred libido and the body. Each stage is defined by an erogenous zone and its characteristic conflict. Erikson centred social relationships, identity, and culture. Psychosexual development is driven by shifting zones of libidinal focus. Psychosocial development is driven by social relationships and culture. Both keep the epigenetic principle, so the sequence still builds. The relocation is really the whole revision. Erikson kept the shape of the sequence and changed where the conflict lives. Not in the body's demands. In what the surrounding social world asks of a person at each age.

Tone

Determinism Against Growth

Then there is tone, which sounds like a matter of temperament but is not. Erikson was markedly more optimistic, and the optimism is structural. Each of his stages presents a crisis that can be resolved favourably. Favourable resolution yields a strength. Hope. Will. Wisdom. Personality, for Erikson, is never finished. That is a long way from Freud. Determinism is the view that early events fix later outcomes. Freud's emphasis on the first six years leaves little room for later repair. Erikson builds that room in deliberately. Which is why the same clinical facts can produce two very different prognoses.

Worked Example

A Life Reviewed at Sixty

Here is a case that separates them cleanly. A sixty-year-old is reflecting on the meaning of her life. She is not in crisis. Not in therapy. Not repeating a childhood pattern. Freud's model has very little to say about her. Its stages closed at puberty. There is no machinery for a developmental task arriving in late adulthood. Erikson frames her situation precisely. This is the integrity-versus-despair crisis of late adulthood. A genuine stage, with its own task and its own virtue. That is the practical reach of a lifespan view. It gives you a question to ask that no other stage model in this chapter can reach.

Handle Carefully

A Broader Theory Is Not Automatically a Better-Evidenced One

One caution before you file Erikson as the upgrade. His revisions made the framework wider, warmer, and more usable. It is worth being precise about what they did not do. Extending the timeline does not by itself supply evidence. Erikson stayed inside a tradition this chapter goes on to criticise. Criticise for limited testability, and for heavy reliance on interpretation. Those concerns apply to the tradition, not only to Freud. So compare the two on their own terms first. Scope, engine, tone, and the role of the ego. And keep the question of evidence as a separate axis entirely. Section three point seven takes that question up directly.

Consolidate

Same Skeleton, Different Body

Consolidate the comparison into one sentence. Erikson kept Freud's stage-based, unconscious, ego-aware framework. And then transformed what was inside it. A psychosexual, childhood-bound, pessimistic theory became something else. A psychosocial, lifespan, growth-oriented one. Five stages became eight. Puberty became death. Bodily zones became social relationships, identity, and culture. An embattled ego became an active organiser. And irreversible early determination became continual reworking. If you can state what stayed and what moved, you have the tool you need. You can place any later psychodynamic theorist on exactly the same map.

About Psychology of Personality at UPI Study

Psychology of Personality (Psychology 300) is a self-paced online course of 83 video lessons in 13 chapters, from Freud, Adler and Jung to biological, behavioral, cognitive, existential and humanistic theories, traits, personality disorders and culture. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →

Compare: Abnormal Psychology vs Psychology of Personality

Why take it here

Why students take Psychology of Personality with UPI Study

What makes each person who they arePsychology of Personality compares the major explanations of why people differ: psychoanalytic and neo-analytic theories, biology and evolution, learning, cognition, existential and humanistic views, and trait models, plus how personality is measured and studied. It is a common course in psychology degrees.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Psychology of Personality carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Comparative Analysis of Freud and Erikson's Psychoanalytic Approaches

What is the difference between Freud's and Erikson's stages of development?
Freud's five psychosexual stages are driven by sexual and aggressive instincts focused on bodily zones, with the last, the genital stage, reached at puberty, while Erikson's eight psychosocial stages are driven by social relationships, identity, and culture and span the whole life. Freud's view is deterministic and pessimistic, with early childhood largely fixing outcomes, while Erikson's is optimistic because each stage's crisis can be resolved favorably. Freud's ego is a pressured mediator; Erikson's is an active organizer of growth.
What did Erikson keep from Freud's psychoanalytic theory?
Erikson kept much of Freud's framework. He accepted that unconscious forces shape behavior, that early experience is formative, and that development moves through ordered stages marked by conflict. He retained the id, ego, and superego structure and agreed that unresolved early conflicts can constrain later functioning. His main changes were to relocate the conflicts from the body to the social world, extend development across the lifespan, and give the ego a more active role.
What is ego psychology?
Ego psychology is the psychoanalytic emphasis on the ego as an active, competent organizer of experience, capable of growth and mastery throughout life, rather than a mediator merely surviving between the id and superego. Erik Erikson's work is a leading example. If the ego can grow, development is more than working off childhood damage, because it can add new capacities. This view underlies Erikson's belief that each life stage can yield a strength, such as hope, will, or wisdom.
Why does Freud's theory say little about adult development compared with Erikson's?
Freud's theory says little about adult development because his final psychosexual stage, the genital stage, begins at puberty, and he described no new developmental tasks after it. Erikson's eight stages run to old age. A sixty-year-old reflecting on the meaning of her life, for example, is facing what Erikson called integrity versus despair, whose favorable resolution yields wisdom. Making claims about adult life also gives Erikson's theory predictions that could fail, though it shares psychoanalysis's limited testability overall.

About the Psychology of Personality course

How many college credits is Psychology of Personality?
Psychology of Personality (Psychology 300) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Psychology of Personality cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 83 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Psychology of Personality take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 83 lessons total about 8 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Psychology of Personality.

83 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Psychology of Personality →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Psychology of Personality
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →