APA Code of Ethics: Standards and Applications in Personality Research

UPI Study › Courses › Psychology of Personality › Free lessons › Lesson 2.12 Free with a free account

APA Code of Ethics: Standards and Applications in Personality Research

Psychology of Personality · Chapter 2: Methods and Ethics in Personality ResearchSection 2.12 · lesson 17 of 838 min · free with a free account

← Personality Research Design: Validity, Reliability, and Practical OutcomesNext lesson: Freud's Psychoanalytic Theory: Instincts, Motivation, and Psychosexual Development →

Earn 3 college credits for Psychology of PersonalityRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Psychology 300 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Psychology of Personality · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

Values that stay aspirational change nothing; the code attaches rules to them.

  • Explain how principles and standards work together
  • State the conditions under which deception is permissible
  • Build consent, security and debriefing into a design
  • Reason through conflicting ethical obligations

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,020 words). Read along, or search it.

Methods and Ethics in Personality Research

The APA Code of Ethics in Personality Research

Everyone in research agrees that participants should not be harmed. Agreement at that level of generality changes almost nothing. This section is about how a profession turns shared values into rules that bind. We will look at the structure of the APA code, which has two layers. At the specific provisions governing personality research. At the conditions under which deception is permissible, which are narrow. And at what a researcher does when two obligations genuinely conflict.

The Structure

Two Layers, Doing Two Different Jobs

The APA Code of Ethics combines two different kinds of content. Broad aspirational principles, and enforceable standards. The principles articulate the values that should guide psychologists. They set direction, and they do not by themselves bind anybody. The specific standards translate those values into binding rules of conduct. Specific enough that they can be complied with, or breached. Both layers are necessary, and it is worth seeing why. A principle nobody can be held to is a preference. And a standard with no principle behind it is arbitrary. Values need enforceable rules to take effect at all.

The Principles

Five Commitments the Standards Serve

The principles themselves are five in number. Beneficence and nonmaleficence. Benefit others, and avoid harming them. Fidelity and responsibility. Trustworthiness, and professional accountability. Integrity. Honesty and accuracy in professional conduct. Justice. Fair and equitable treatment of all people. And respect for people's rights and dignity. These are stated at a level general enough to cover cases nobody anticipated. That generality is deliberate, and it is a feature rather than vagueness. It is also exactly why concrete standards are needed underneath them.

For This Field

What the Code Governs in Personality Research

For personality research specifically, the code addresses five areas. Consent. Deception. Confidentiality. Data handling. And the responsible reporting of results. Personality research touches all five as a matter of routine. It collects sensitive self-descriptions from people. It often needs participants not to know the hypothesis being tested. And it produces findings about groups of people who can sometimes be identified. So none of these provisions is a distant concern for this field.

Deception

Three Conditions, All Required

Deception is permitted, and the conditions are narrow. First, any deception must be justified. There has to be a reason the study cannot be done without it. Second, it must be debriefed. Participants are informed of the study's true nature afterwards. Third, it must be free of foreseeable harm. The deception must not carry a harm that could have been anticipated in advance. And running underneath all three is one further requirement. Participants' welfare takes precedence. That clause settles the conflict before it arises. Where welfare and the design collide, it is the design that gives way. Not the participant.

The Practice

Ethics as a Process, Not a Checkpoint

Picture the ethical work as a loop rather than a gate. Issues are anticipated during design, before anything is built. Consent procedures and secure storage are planned. The study goes for independent review. Safeguards operate while it is running. And participants are debriefed, with results reported honestly. Which feeds back into how the next study is designed. The important claim in that picture is that there is no single moment where ethics is finished.

In Advance

Anticipate, Rather Than React

Applying the code means anticipating ethical issues during design. Rather than reacting to them after harm has occurred. So researchers plan informed consent procedures in advance. They arrange secure data storage. They write debriefing protocols before anyone is recruited. And they submit studies for independent ethical review. Reacting afterwards is not simply a slower version of the same thing. By the time an issue is visible in the data, the participant has already had the experience. Some obligations can only be met before the study runs. And where studies involve sensitive personality content, extra safeguards apply. To protect participants who are vulnerable in ways the ordinary procedure does not cover.

Applied

Each Principle, Made Operational

Each principle becomes operational through a specific research application. Beneficence, meaning benefit and avoid harm, becomes minimising participant burden. Integrity, meaning honesty in practice, becomes accurate reporting. Justice, meaning fairness in access, becomes equitable participation. Respect, for rights and dignity, becomes informed consent. And responsibility, meaning accountability, becomes independent review. That third column is what makes the first column enforceable. Minimise participant burden is something a review board can examine. Be beneficent is not. The translation from value to obligation is where the code does its actual work.

Conflicts

When Two Obligations Point Different Ways

Real-world application also requires judgement, where standards meet ambiguity. The clearest example is a conflict between two genuine obligations. Confidentiality, against a duty to prevent serious harm. Both are real. Both are in the code. And they point in different directions. The code guides such decisions rather than resolving them mechanically. It directs psychologists to weigh the principles against each other. And to consult colleagues, or review boards. That consultation requirement is doing something specific. It makes the reasoning visible to somebody other than the person who benefits from the conclusion. So ethical practice is an ongoing, reasoned process, rather than a one-time checklist. A checklist cannot contain a case it did not foresee. And the hard cases are always the unforeseen ones.

Case

A Study That Needed Participants Not to Know

Take a study that genuinely needs participants not to know what is being tested. It requires brief deception, to avoid biasing responses. Told the hypothesis, participants would answer to it, rather than honestly. Following the code, the researchers do four things. They justify the deception, documenting why the study cannot run without it. They obtain review-board approval, so an independent body agrees the justification holds. They ensure no lasting harm, designing the deception so nothing foreseeable follows from it. And they fully debrief participants afterwards. All four steps are required, and that is the point of the example. Doing three of them well does not make the fourth one optional.

Consolidate

Ethics Built In, Not Assessed Afterwards

The reason the code has this two-layer shape is now, I hope, clear. It links aspirational principles to enforceable standards. So that ethics is built into research design. Rather than assessed after the fact, when harm may already have occurred. In practice that means planning consent, security and debriefing in advance. And submitting the study for independent ethical review. And for the cases the standards do not settle, it means something harder. Treating them as reasoning to be done, and recorded. Rather than as rules to be looked up.

About Psychology of Personality at UPI Study

Psychology of Personality (Psychology 300) is a self-paced online course of 83 video lessons in 13 chapters, from Freud, Adler and Jung to biological, behavioral, cognitive, existential and humanistic theories, traits, personality disorders and culture. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →

Compare: Abnormal Psychology vs Psychology of Personality

Why take it here

Why students take Psychology of Personality with UPI Study

What makes each person who they arePsychology of Personality compares the major explanations of why people differ: psychoanalytic and neo-analytic theories, biology and evolution, learning, cognition, existential and humanistic views, and trait models, plus how personality is measured and studied. It is a common course in psychology degrees.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Psychology of Personality carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About APA Code of Ethics: Standards and Applications in Personality Research

What are the five general principles of the APA Ethics Code?
The five general principles are beneficence and nonmaleficence, fidelity and responsibility, integrity, justice, and respect for people's rights and dignity. They call on psychologists to benefit others and avoid harm, be trustworthy and accountable, be honest and accurate, treat people fairly, and respect individuals' rights. These principles are aspirational values rather than binding rules; the code's enforceable ethical standards translate them into specific rules of conduct.
When is deception allowed in psychology research under the APA Ethics Code?
Deception is allowed only under narrow conditions: it must be justified by the study's significant prospective value when no effective nondeceptive alternative is feasible, it may not be used in research reasonably expected to cause physical pain or severe emotional distress, and participants must be debriefed about the study's true nature afterward. A study that would be biased if participants knew the hypothesis may use brief deception, but only with documented justification, review-board approval, no lasting harm, and full debriefing.
How do psychologists resolve conflicts between ethical obligations?
The APA code guides rather than mechanically settles conflicts between obligations, such as confidentiality versus a duty to prevent serious harm. Psychologists are directed to weigh the competing principles and consult colleagues or review boards, which makes the reasoning visible to someone other than the person who benefits from the conclusion. Ethical practice is therefore an ongoing, reasoned process rather than a one-time checklist, because a checklist cannot cover cases nobody foresaw.
How is the APA Ethics Code applied when designing a personality study?
The code is applied by anticipating ethical issues during design rather than reacting after harm occurs. Researchers plan informed consent procedures, arrange secure data storage, write debriefing protocols before anyone is recruited, and submit the study for independent ethical review. Consent, deception, confidentiality, data handling, and honest reporting are routine concerns because personality studies collect sensitive self-descriptions, and extra safeguards apply when participants are vulnerable.

About the Psychology of Personality course

How many college credits is Psychology of Personality?
Psychology of Personality (Psychology 300) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Psychology of Personality cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 83 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Psychology of Personality take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 83 lessons total about 8 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Psychology of Personality.

83 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Psychology of Personality →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Psychology of Personality
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →